Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

An offshore wind project for New York may be abandoned over Trump administration delays

SUMMARY:

  • may cancel due to Trump’s construction freeze
  • Interior Secretary paused project citing rushed Biden-era approval
  • Equinor losing $50M weekly; over $2.5B already invested
  • NY, other states sue to block Trump’s anti-wind executive order

 

The Norwegian energy company Equinor said Friday it will be forced to terminate an project for New York within days unless President Donald Trump ‘s administration relents on its order that stopped construction.

Work on Empire Wind has been paused since April 16, when Interior Secretary Doug Burgum directed the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management to halt construction. Burgum said it needs further review because it appeared the Biden administration rushed the approval. Equinor went through a seven-year permitting process before starting to build Empire Wind last year, and the project is roughly a third complete.

Trump has been hostile to , particularly offshore wind, and has signed a spate of executive orders aimed at boosting oil, gas and coal. His first day in office, Trump signed an executive order temporarily halting offshore wind lease sales in federal waters and pausing the issuance of approvals, permits and loans for all wind projects.

Empire Wind is fully permitted and the developer has already invested more than $2.5 billion so far in the project, said Molly Morris, president of Equinor Renewables Americas, in an interview Friday.

She said this is an “urgent, unsustainable situation” because each day of uncertainty is extremely expensive: Equinor spends up to $50 million per week on the project and has 11 vessels on standby. The developer has done a significant amount of onshore work already, where the cable from the wind farm will connect to the local grid.

“If no material progress is made toward a resolution within days, Equinor will be forced to terminate the project,” she said. “This is about honoring contracts and financial investments made in the U.S. It could set a dangerous precedent by stopping a project in mid-execution.”

The did not immediately respond to emails seeking comment.

Equinor has over $60 billion in investments across the U.S., including substantial oil, gas and renewable projects. RWE, a German energy company, has stopped its offshore wind work in the United States, citing the political environment. French energy giant TotalEnergies paused the development of its offshore wind project in New York after Trump won reelection.

Equinor is considering legal options, but rather than getting tied up in the courts, Morris said the best way forward is a quicker political resolution. The summer construction window for major offshore work began this month, and missing it would set the project back a year, she said.

Morris and Equinor CEO Anders Opedal met with Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, on Wednesday. She said it was helpful, but they’ve asked to meet with Burgum and haven’t gotten a meeting.

Equinor is building Empire Wind to start providing power in 2026 for more than 500,000 New York homes. Equinor finalized the federal lease for Empire Wind in March 2017, early in Trump’s first term. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management approved the construction and operations plan in February 2024 and construction began that year.

New York is leading a coalition of state attorneys general challenging the wind energy executive order in court. They say in the lawsuit filed Monday that Trump doesn’t have the authority to unilaterally shut down the permitting process, and he’s jeopardizing development of a power source critical to the states’ economic vitality, energy mix, public health and climate goals.

The White House says Democratic attorneys general are trying to stop the president’s popular energy agenda instead of working with him to restore America’s energy dominance.

Virginia unemployment claims rise amid federal layoffs


SUMMARY:

  • Over 121,000 federal employees have faced or have been targeted for layoffs
  • Virginia’s initial claims rose 8.1% in one week.
  • Expert expects to see reduction in the state’s administrative services
  • Weldon Cooper Center predicts rising unemployment in Virginia through 2025

A recent spike in claims can likely be traced to sweeping under the second Trump administration.

For the week ending May 3, the number of individuals filing initial claims for unemployment was 2,720, according to a Thursday news release from the Virginia Department of Workforce Development and Advancement, which is also known as Virginia Works. That’s an 8.1% increase in claims over the previous week and an 8.9% increase over a comparable week in 2024.

“We are starting to see some job losses,” Terry Clower, professor of public policy at George Mason University’s Schar School of Policy and Government, said. “It’s not a huge number yet, but it’s starting to add up.”

Since President Donald Trump returned to the White House in January, more than 100,000 federal employees have been fired or put on leave as part of a measure to cut federal spending. A CNN tracker puts the number of federal workers laid off or targeted for layoffs at 121,361 as of April 28. More than 321,500 federal workers live in Virginia, according to data from the 2023 Census Bureau’s American Community Survey.

The Trump administration has also cut federal contracts to curb federal spending, which is anticipated to result in layoffs among some government contractors. (For instance, in April, Goldschmitt and Associates, a Sterling-based business management firm, announced plans to lay off 217 employees, citing a reduction in a federal contract as the reason for the cut jobs.)

Along with federal spending cuts, the economy is also responding to Trump’s trade war and its accompanying , which has grown economic uncertainty,  resulted in $11 trillion in stock market losses in the short term and is expected to result in greater and supply chain problems.

The increase in unemployment claims, Clower said, is a result of a “compounded storm of tariffs hitting parts of Virginia that deal a lot with trade and the supplies that we get in for , and then, of course … dealing with the uncertainty of federal and federal contracts at the moment.”

Like Clower, João Ferreira, a regional economist at the University of Virginia’s Weldon Cooper Center for Economic and Policy Studies, was not surprised by the state’s increase in unemployment claims.

In April, the Weldon Cooper Center for Public Service released an for Virginia, predicting unemployment in Virginia will continue to grow over the course of the year to a level not seen since 2021. “We expect this to be a trend as the federal activity in Virginia is reduced,” Ferreira said.

However, Virginia Labor Secretary Bryan Slater cautioned in a statement Monday that the news might not be as grim as it seems:  “To date, we have only seen approximately 1,700 federal employees and federal contractors file for unemployment, far below any projections that have been made over the past 90 days.”

Slater also noted that Virginia has more than 225,000 open jobs and directed job seekers to the website VirginiaHasJobs.com.

“Virginia’s unemployment rate is 3.2% — a full point lower than the national average and considerably lower than most of our competitors and surrounding states,” Slater said in his statement. “Our initial claims are lower than they were three and four weeks ago and in line with the 10-year average and well below the 30-year average of 5,235. Our continuing claims are well below the 10- and 30-year averages of 20,239 and 33,844.”

About 83% of claimants making initial unemployment claims self-reported their occupations. More than 500 worked in professional, scientific and technical services. Other top fields reported by claimants were administrative and support and waste management (275); retail trade (217); health care and social assistance (208); and manufacturing (145).

Ferreira expects to see a reduction in the state’s administrative services jobs as well as a slowdown in growth of professional, scientific and technical services jobs in 2025.

Also in Virginia, continuing unemployment claims for the week ending May 3 were 1.5% higher than the previous week and 15.1% higher than a comparable week in 2024, according to Virginia Works. Those numbers indicate that “those folks that have lost a job are finding it harder to find one now,” Clower said.

Of the 17,896 continuing claims, nearly 92% of claimants self reported their professions. The top industries were professional, scientific and technical services (3,748); administrative and support and waste management (2,225); health care and social assistance (1,579); retail trade (1,392); and manufacturing (1,161).

But Virginia also has seen major layoff announcements outside of the federal government and government contracting in recent weeks. Earlier this month, Georgia-Pacific told 554 employees they would lose their jobs at its Emporia plywood mill, which the company is closing in response to a 30-year low in existing home sales.

U.S. Sen. Mark Warner, Virginia’s Democratic senior senator, touched on the economy during a Thursday media call.

“I’ve never seen a more self-made economic crisis,” said Warner, “and it is created because of the whim of one individual: Donald Trump.”

Editor’s note: This story was updated May 12 to include Virginia Labor Secretary Bryan Slater’s statement.

Norfolk casino developer pledges $1M to NSU

The company behind the $750 million casino pledged $1 million to Norfolk State University to support its business school’s tourism and management program.

, which is developing the still-unnamed with the , will be the title sponsor of ‘s Boyd Gaming Department of Tourism & Hospitality Management, the company announced Friday.

“We are pleased to enter into this partnership with one of the leading gaming corporations in the United States,” NSU President Javaune Adams-Gaston said in a statement. “Our Department of Tourism & Hospitality is the perfect place to prepare the next generation of gaming professionals.”

Construction began in February on the long-awaited casino, which is expected to create 850 . The resort casino was approved by Norfolk voters in fall 2020, but construction was delayed due to conflicts over design plans between Norfolk City Council and the developers. An earlier partnership between the and Tennessee investor Jon Yarbrough ended last year, and Boyd Gaming entered the picture. At that time, Boyd and the tribe scrapped the casino’s previously announced branding as the HeadWaters Resort & Casino.

In September 2024, Norfolk City Council approved the development agreement between the city, the tribe and Boyd, and since then, the project has moved forward. A temporary casino is expected to be completed late this year, with the permanent casino resort is expected to open in late 2027.

The permanent casino will have 1,500 slot machines, 50 table games, a 200-room hotel, eight food and beverage outlets, a 45,000-square-foot outdoor amenity deck and live entertainment.

Earlier this week, the two casino partners granted Old Dominion University and Tidewater Community College $50,000 each to help develop education and training programs to support the casino’s workforce needs. In October 2024, the casino partners gave $100,000 to NSU.

Boyd Gaming and the Pamunkey Tribe “look forward to working closely with our friends and partners at NSU in the years ahead as we build a best-in-class team and create exciting career opportunities for Norfolk State graduates at our resort,” Ron Bailey, vice president and general manager of the Norfolk casino, said in a statement.

Boyd Gaming operates 28 gaming properties in 10 states, manages a tribal casino in California and owns and operates Boyd Interactive, an online casino gaming business. The company also is a 5% equity owner of FanDuel Group, a sports betting operator.

Virginia has three operating in Danville, Bristol and Portsmouth, and construction on the $1.4 billion Live! Casino & Hotel Virginia in Petersburg began in March.

As US and China begin trade talks in Geneva, Trump’s tariff hammer looks less mighty than he claims

SUMMARY:

  • Trump raises on Chinese imports to 145%, prompting retaliation
  • China remains defiant, citing U.S. dependence on its
  • Trade talks in Geneva begin with little hope for immediate resolution
  • Both U.S. and Chinese economies face pressure amid prolonged standoff

WASHINGTON (AP) — The way President Donald Trump sees it, beating China in a trade war should be easy.

After all, his logic goes, the Chinese sell Americans three times as much stuff as Americans sell them. Therefore, they have more to lose. Inflict enough pain – like the combined 145% taxes he slapped on Chinese imports last month – and they’ll beg for mercy.

Trump’s treasury secretary, has confidently compared Beijing to a card player stuck with a losing hand. “They’re playing with a pair of twos,” he said.

Somebody forgot to tell China. So far, the Chinese have refused to fold under the pressure of Trump’s massive tariffs. Instead, they have retaliated with triple-digit tariffs of their own.

“All bullies are just paper tigers,” the Chinese Foreign Ministry declared in a video last week. “Kneeling only invites more bullying.”

The stakes are high between the world’s two biggest economies whose trade topped $660 billion last year. Bessent and Trump’s top trade negotiator, Jamieson Greer, are heading to Geneva this weekend for initial trade talks with top Chinese officials. Trump suggested Friday that the U.S. could lower its tariffs on China, saying in a Truth Social post that “80% Tariff seems right! Up to Scott.″

While businesses and investors welcome any easing of tensions, the prospects for a quick and significant breakthrough appear dim.

“These are talks about talks, and China may be coming to assess what’s on the table — or even just to buy time,” said Craig Singleton, senior China fellow at the Washington-based think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies. “There’s no shared roadmap or clear pathway to de-escalation.”

But if the two countries eventually agree to scale back the massive taxes – tariffs – they’ve slapped on each other’s goods, it would relieve world financial markets and companies on both sides of the Pacific Ocean that depend on U.S.-China trade.

“The companies involved in this trade on both sides just cannot afford waiting anymore,” said economist John Gong of the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing. In a worst-case scenario, China could walk away from the negotiations if it feels the U.S. side isn’t treating China as an equal or isn’t willing to take the first step to deescalate, Gong said.

“I think if (Bessent) doesn’t go into this negotiation with this kind of mindset, this could be very difficult,” he said.

For now, the two countries can’t even agree on who requested the talks. “The meeting is being held at the request of the U.S. side,” Chinese Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian said Wednesday. Trump disagreed. “They ought to go back and study their files,” he said.

Trump’s faith in tariffs meet economic reality
What seems clear is that Trump’s favorite economic weapon – , or tariffs – has not proved as mighty as he’d hoped.

“For Trump, what’s happened here is that the rhetoric of his campaign has finally had to face economic reality,” said Jeff Moon, a trade official in the Obama administration who now runs the China Moon Strategies consultancy. “The idea that he was going to bring China to its knees in terms of tariffs was never going to work.”

Trump views tariffs an all-purpose economic tool that can raise money for the U.S. Treasury, protect American industries, lure factories to the United States and pressure other countries to bend to his will, even on issues such as immigration and drug trafficking.

He used tariffs in his first term and has been even more aggressive and unpredictable about imposing them in his second. He’s slapped a 10% tariff on almost every country in the world, blowing up the rules that had governed for decades.

But it’s his trade war with China that has really put markets and businesses on edge. It started in February when he announced a 10% levy on Chinese imports. By April, Trump ratcheted up the taxes on China to a staggering 145%. Beijing upped its tariff on American products to 125%.

Trump’s escalation sent financial markets tumbling and left U.S. retailers warning that they might run out of goods as U.S.-China trade implodes. U.S. consumers, worried about the prospect of empty shelves and higher prices, are losing confidence in the economy.

“This was not very well planned,” said Zongyuan Zoe Liu, senior fellow in China studies at the Council on Foreign Relations. “I don’t think he intended to have the tariffs escalate into this chaos.”

China was ready for a rematch

When Trump hit Chinese imports with tariffs during his first term, he charged that Beijing used unfair tactics, including cybertheft, to give its technology firms an edge.

The two countries reached a truce – the so-called Phase One agreement — in January 2020; China agreed to buy more U.S. products, and Trump held off on even higher tariffs. But they didn’t resolve the big issues dividing them, including China’s subsidies of homegrown tech firms.

China was ready for a rematch when Trump returned to the White House. It had worked to reduce its dependence on America’s massive market, cutting the U.S. share of its exports to 15% last year from more than 19% in 2018, according to Dexter Roberts of the Atlantic Council.

Beijing is confident that the Chinese people are more willing than Americans to endure the fallout from a trade war, including falling exports and shuttered factories. “For China, it’s painful, but it’s also imperative to withstand it, and it’s prepared to cope with it,” said Sun Yun, director of the China program at the Stimson Center.

Dependency works both ways

In addition to miscalculating Chinese resolve, the Trump administration may have underestimated how much America relies on China.

For decades, Americans have come to depend on Chinese factories. They produce 97% of America’s imported baby carriages, 96% of its artificial flowers and umbrellas, 95% of its fireworks, 93% of its children’s coloring books and 90% of its combs.

“Without us, what do they have to sell?” Chinese toymaker Cheng Zhengren told Beijing News. “Their shelves would be empty.”

The showerhead company Afina last month reported on an experiment suggesting that American consumers have little willingness to pay more for American-made products. Afina makes a filtered showerhead in China and Vietnam that retails for $129. Making the same product in America would lift the price to $239. When customers on the company’s website were given a choice between them, 584 chose the cheap Asian one; not one opted for the costlier U.S.-made version.

And it’s not just consumers who depend on China. America’s own factories do, too. The National Association of Manufacturers calculates that 47% of U.S. imports from China in 2023 were “manufacturing inputs” – industrial supplies, auto parts and capital equipment that American manufacturers used to make other their own products domestically. So Trump’s tariffs risk raising costs and reducing supplies that U.S. factories rely on, making them less competitive.

Louise Loo, China economist at Oxford Economics, a consulting firm, said that China’s ability to reduce its dependence on the U.S. market in recent years means “they’re probably likely to be able to find substitutes for buyers, much easier than the U.S. side will be able to find suppliers.”

Still, China won’t emerge from a trade war unscathed either. Citing the impact of the trade war, the International Monetary Fund last month downgraded the outlook for the Chinese economy this year and next.

“China needs the United States of America,” White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said at Friday’s news briefing. “They need our markets. They need our consumer base. And Secretary Bessent knows that he’s going to Switzerland this weekend with the full support and confidence and trust of the president here at home.”

Indeed Moon, who also served as a diplomat in China, noted that the tariffs cut both ways: “Both of them are highly dependent on bilateral trade. They have put themselves in a corner.”

Jens Eskelun, president of the EU Chamber of Commerce in China, expressed relief that U.S. and Chinese officials were meeting.

“So good,” he said, pointing to the Vatican conclave that just picked a new pope as inspiration. “Lock them in a room and then hopefully white smoke will come out.”

Two dolls instead of 30? Toys become the latest symbol of Trump’s trade war

In Brief:
  • Trump downplays doll tariff impact, sparking backlash
  • Nearly 80% of U.S. toys are made in China
  • Industry warns of holiday shortages and rising prices
  • Toy makers urge quick resolution to U.S.-

NEW YORK (AP) — President Donald Trump’s crusade has taken aim at a number of foreign goods, from European wines and car parts from Mexico to films made abroad. Lately, the president’s wandering ire has found another rhetorical poster child: toy dolls.

Trump asserted that children will be fine having two dolls — perhaps three or five — instead of 30 if U.S. increase consumer prices. The response on social media included memes of him portrayed as the Grinch and photos of a young Barron Trump’s child-sized Mercedes convertible.

“COMPLETELY out of touch,” The Loyal Subjects CEO Jonathan Cathey, whose collectible toy company in Los Angeles produces Strawberry Shortcake and dolls, wrote on Linkedin. “If that ain’t a ‘Let them eat cake’ moment shot through the echoes of history? Love how toys and dolls have become THE martyr metaphor for this nonsensical trade war incoherence.”

The president’s comments also touched a nerve with parents, both ones who took offense at the casual way he hypothesized that perhaps “two dolls will cost a couple bucks more” and those who acknowledged their own kids have more toys than they need.

Either way, the U.S. has a lot riding on a possible deescalation of the tariff standoff between the Trump administration and the government in Beijing. Nearly 80% of the toys sold in the U.S. come from China.

The Toy Association, a trade group, has lobbied for an immediate reprieve from the 145% tariff rate the president put on Chinese-made products. Some toy companies warn the likelihood of holiday shortages increases each week the tariff remains in effect.

Here’s a snapshot of the doll debate and how tariffs are impacting toys:

How much is the US doll market worth?

From Barbie, Bratz and Cabbage Patch Kids to Adora baby dolls, American Girl and Our Generation, dolls are a big business in the U.S. as well as beloved playthings.

The doll category, which includes accessories like clothes, generated U.S. sales of $2.7 billion last year compared to $2.9 billion in 2023 and $3.4 billion in 2019, according to market research firm Circana.

Consumers splurged on toys during the height of the COVID pandemic to keep children and themselves occupied, but sales flattened as seized the economy.

Younger girls becoming more interested in buying makeup and skincare also has cooled the demand for dolls, Marshal Cohen, Circana’s chief retail advisor, said.

What are toy companies doing to navigate tariffs?
The nation’s largest toy maker, , said this week it would have to raise prices for some products sold in the U.S. to offset higher costs related to tariffs.

The company, whose brands include Barbie and American Girl, said the increases were necessary even though it’s speeding up the expansion of its base outside of China.

Smaller toy companies are expected to have a harder time than Mattel and Hasbro, which makes the eating, drinking and diaper-wetting Baby Alive. Cathey said he paused The Loyal Subjects’ shipments from China in April because he couldn’t pay the stratospheric tariff they would have incurred.

“Nobody insulates themselves with that much cash,” he said.

With about four months’ worth of inventory on hand, Cathey said his ability to secure holiday stock depends on a break in the U.S.-China trade standoff happening in the next two weeks since it would take time for cargo operations to resume.

Cepia, a Missouri company that was behind the 2009 holiday season hit Zhu Zhu Pets, launched a line of 11-inch fashion dolls called Decora Girlz last year. CEO James Russell Hornsby said he was working to relocate some production but the move won’t happen in time to replace the orders he planned to get from China.

Hornsby described himself as a Trump supporter and said he understands the administration’s desire to reduce trade imbalances.

“Let’s just get the deals done and stop all this because (Trump’s) disrupting Christmas,” he said.

What goes into making a doll?

Although American Girl launched in 1986 with a line based on fictional historical characters, the dolls never were domestic products. They were made in Germany before production eventually moved to China.

Toy experts say that in addition to lower costs, Chinese factories have developed techniques and expertise that are not easily replicated.

“We don’t have any capacity in the U.S. to make rooted doll hair. And then you’ve got things like the faces. Some of them are hand-painted, others are done with a Tampo (printing) machine,” James Zahn, editor-in-chief of industry publication The Toy Book, said of doll-making.

Hornsby said rooting the synthetic hair onto the heads of Decora Girlz dolls is carried out by skilled workers at factories in Guangzhou and Dongguan, China.

“It’s not just sticking into a machine and it automatically does it,” he said. ”You have to know what you’re doing in order to make that doll look like it’s got a full set of hair when literally maybe only 60% of the head is filled with hair.”

Are toys from China safe?

White House Deputy Chief of Staff Stephen Miller said last week that he assumes consumers would prefer to pay more for American-made products. Dolls made in China might have lead paint in them, he said.

Teresa Murray, consumer watchdog director at the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, said the picture is more complicated.

Products for children ages 12 and under require third-party testing and certification from labs approved by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission, the agency tasked with enforcing lead levels in toys, Murray said.

The rules apply to all products sold in the U.S. Toys by major brands such as Fisher-Price, Mattel, Hasbro and Lego, which have long outsourced manufacturing to China, are usually in compliance, she said.

But the rise of online shopping, including e-commerce platforms that ship directly to U.S. consumers from overseas, has posed a challenge, according to Murray. When valued at less than $800, such parcels entered the U.S. duty-free and were not subject to the same scrutiny as bulk imports, she said.

The White House eliminated the customs exemption starting May 2 for low-value parcels that originated in mainland China and Hong Kong. U.S Customs and Border Protection expects additional oversight will make it easier to flag problems.

Toy companies and industry experts argue the high tariffs on Chinese imports will tempt price-sensitive shoppers to search for cheap that carry higher safety risks.

Can children have too many dolls?

Plenty of people agree American consumer culture has gotten out of hand, in large part due to prices kept low through the labor of foreign factory workers who earn much less than they would in the U.S.

Katie Walley-Wiegert, 38, a senior marketer in , Virginia, and the parent of a 2-year-old son, agrees there’s too much materialism but thinks parents should have choices when deciding what is best for their children. She found the wealthy Trump’s comments off-putting.

“I think it is a small view of what purchase habits and realities are for people who buy toys for kids,” Walley-Wiegert said.

San Francisco resident Elenor Mak, who founded the Jilly Bing doll company after she couldn’t find an Asian American doll for her daughter, Jillian, now 5, said the president’s remarks upset her because some families struggle to buy even one doll.

The trade war with China “just makes it even more impossible for those families,” Mak said.

Air traffic controllers for Newark airport briefly lose radar access again

In Brief:
  • hits for second time in 2 weeks
  • Nearly 300 delays and dozens of cancellations reported
  • Outdated copper wires and controller shortages blamed
  • plans upgrades with fiber optics and new radar systems

The air traffic controllers directing planes into the Newark, New Jersey, airport lost their radar Friday morning for the second time in two weeks.

The Federal Aviation Administration said the radar at the facility in Philadelphia that directs planes in and out of Newark airport went black for 90 seconds at 3:55 a.m. Friday. That’s similar to what happened on April 28.

That first radar outage led to hundreds of flights being canceled or delayed at the Newark airport in the past two weeks after the FAA slowed down traffic at the airport to ensure safety. Five controllers also went on trauma leave after that outage, worsening the existing shortage. It’s not clear if any additional controllers will go on leave now.

The number of cancellations of Newark departures jumped from the low 40s to 57 after this latest outage to lead the nation, according to FlightAware.com. Newark ranks second in the number of cancelled arrivals with 60, but that number also increased Friday morning. Nearly 300 delays were reported at the airport. Officials said there have been more than 1,700 cancellations and delays at the airport this week.

U.S. Rep. blamed the problems that have plagued Newark on the lack of proper air traffic controller staffing and modern technology. He said at a news conference Friday that there are currently 22 controllers working, and that number should be in the 60s. And many of the lines connecting controllers to the radar are outdated copper wires. He said the April 28 outage was caused by one of those copper wires getting fried.

“Our region is a key economic artery for our country. Yet this region… one of the busiest air spaces in the world, as I mentioned, is running off a tower that’s full of copper wire dating back to the 1980s with outdated and inefficient technology. And the region is short — and this is a big deal. The region is short about 40 air traffic controllers,” Gottheimer said. He said the tower was built back in “the Brady Bunch era” in 1973.

The FAA said earlier this week that it is installing new fiber optic data lines to carry the radar signal between its facilities in Philadelphia and New York. Officials said some of the lines connecting those two facilities are outdated copper wire that will be replaced. But it’s not clear how quickly those repairs can be completed.

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy announced a multi-billion-dollar plan Thursday to replace the nation’s aging system to prevent problems like this from happening and give controllers modern technology. That plan includes installing 4,600 new high-speed connections and replacing 618 radars across the country.

Officials developed the plan to upgrade the system after a deadly midair collision in January between a passenger jet and an Army helicopter killed 67 people in the skies over Washington, D.C. Several other crashes this year also put pressure on officials to act.

But the shortcomings of the air traffic control system have been known for decades. The National Transportation Safety Board has not determined that a problem with the air traffic control system caused that crash near Reagan National Airport.

Average rate on a US 30-year mortgage holds steady at 6.76%, not far from highest levels this year

SUMMARY:

  • rate remains at 6.76%, down from 7.09% a year ago
  • 15-year mortgage rate eases slightly to 5.89%
  • High rates and prices limit activity
  • Fed holds rates steady, expects continued rate volatility

 

The average rate on a 30-year mortgage in the U.S. held steady this week, not far from its highest levels this year, but below where it was a year ago.

The rate stood at 6.76% for the second week in a row, mortgage buyer Freddie Mac said Thursday. A year ago, the rate averaged 7.09%.

Borrowing costs on 15-year fixed-rate mortgages, popular with homeowners their home loans, eased. The average rate dropped to 5.89% from 5.92% last week. It’s down from 6.38% a year ago, Freddie Mac said.

are influenced by several factors, including global demand for U.S. Treasurys, the Federal Reserve’s interest rate policy decisions and bond market investors’ expectations about the economy and .

After climbing to a just above 7% in mid-January, the average rate on a 30-year mortgage has remained above 6.62%, where it was just four weeks ago. It then spiked above 6.8% in the following two weeks and eased last week to 6.76%.

The recent swings in mortgage rates reflect volatility in the 10-year Treasury yield, which lenders use as a guide to pricing home loans.

The yield, which had mostly fallen after climbing to around 4.8% in mid-January, surged last month to 4.5% amid a sell-off in government bonds triggered by investor anxiety over the Trump administration’s trade war.

The 10-year Treasury yield was at 4.33% in midday trading Thursday, up from 4.26% late Wednesday.

Elevated mortgage rates and rising home prices remain affordability hurdles for many would-be homebuyers, key reasons why the spring homebuying season is off to a lackluster start, even as the inventory of homes on the market is up sharply from last year. Sales of previously occupied U.S. homes fell in March, posting the largest monthly drop since November 2022.

The median monthly housing payment was $2,868 in the four weeks ended May 4, an all-time high, according to a new report from Redfin.

Economists expect mortgage rates to remain volatile in coming months, though they generally call for the average rate on a 30-year mortgage to remain above 6.5% this year.

On Wednesday, the Federal Reserve left its main interest alone, as was widely expected, even as it noted an increased risk of higher and inflation. While the Fed doesn’t set rates on home loans, its actions can influence the trajectory of mortgage rates.

“Looking ahead, the Fed’s wait-and-see approach is likely to keep mortgage rates at a high-6% in the near term, unless major policy developments or economic shifts occur, such as notable outcomes from the upcoming U.S.- scheduled for this weekend,” said Jiayi Xu, economist at Realtor.com.

Wall Street drifts as it waits for a highly anticipated US-China meeting on trade

In Brief:
  • Markets steady as investors await U.S.-China trade meeting
  • Trump floats lowering , jolts markets briefly
  • Lyft and Insulet surge after strong earnings
  • Expedia and Sweetgreen dip on weak demand and forecasts

NEW YORK (AP) — U.S. are drifting Friday as heads toward the end of an unusually quiet week.

The was virtually unchanged in midday trading and on track for a dip of 0.4% for the week. This may be the first week in seven where the index at the heart of many 401(k) accounts moves by less than 1.5%, after swinging sharply first on fears about and then on hopes that he’ll relent on some of his tariffs.

The Industrial Average was down 65 points, or 0.2%, as of 11:45 a.m. Eastern time, and the composite was flat.

The big event for the week is likely coming on Saturday, when trading will be closed in financial markets. That’s when high-level U.S. and Chinese officials will be meeting in Switzerland for their first talks since Trump launched an escalating trade war between the world’s two largest economies. The fear among investors and economists is that a recession could hit if the United States doesn’t reach trade deals that lower its tariffs by enough and quickly enough.

Trump on Friday floated the idea of bringing tariffs on Chinese imports down to 80% from their current 145% rate, but he said it’ll be up to Treasury Secretary , who will be in Switzerland. While that would indeed be a reduction, it would still be high, and Trump’s posting on social media caused a brief jolt in financial markets. Futures for U.S. stocks sank immediately.

But markets later calmed as the wait continued for what U.S. and Chinese officials will say after their meeting.

Trump also talked up the potential for more trade deals that could be on the way, following his announcement the day before on an agreement with the United Kingdom.

“Many Trade Deals in the hopper, all good (GREAT!) ones!” he said on his Truth Social network.

In the meantime, the flow of earnings reports for the start of the year from companies is slowing but still moving the market.

Lyft rallied 22.3% after delivering a stronger profit for the latest quarter than analysts expected. The company said it reached the highest weekly ridership levels in its history during the last week of March.

Taiwan Semiconductor , the chip giant known as TSMC, offered an encouraging report after saying its revenue in April leaped 48.1% from a year earlier. That sent its stock that trades in the United States up 1.8%.

Insulet jumped 20.1% for the biggest gain in the S&P 500 after the medical device company reported stronger results for the latest quarter than analysts expected. The company, which sells tubeless insulin pump technology, also raised its forecast for an underlying revenue trend for the full year.

They helped offset a 7.3% drop for Expedia. The travel website, which owns Vrbo and Hotels.com, reported a stronger profit than analysts expected, but it also said demand was weaker than it expected during the quarter. It highlighted softer-than-expected demand in the United States, as well as a nearly 30% decline in bookings from Canada to its southern neighbor.

Other travel-related companies, including Hilton and Airbnb, have reported a similar softening in travel demand to the U.S. in their recent earnings reports.

Sweetgreen wilted by 17.9% after the salad seller reported a slightly larger loss for the latest quarter than analysts expected. The fast-casual restaurant chain also gave a forecast for revenue over the full year that fell just short of analysts’ estimates.

In stock markets abroad, indexes rose modestly in Europe after finishing mixed in Asia.

Stocks added 0.4% in Hong Kong but fell 0.3% in Shanghai after China reported that its exports rose at a faster-than-expected 8.1% annual pace in April. Exports to the United States dropped more than 20%, however, as Trump’s steep tariff increases took effect. China is the world’s biggest exporter.

In the bond market, the yield on the 10-year Treasury edged down to 4.36% from 4.37% late Thursday.

CoStar to purchase Australian property listings platform for $1.9B

Arlington County data firm announced Friday it has signed a deal to acquire , an Australian property listings platform, for 3 billion in Australian dollars, or $1.9 billion in U.S. dollars.

owns a 16.9% stake in Domain, which it purchased in February. Domain is currently valued at approximately $1.7 billion, and under the terms of the contract, CoStar has agreed to pay Domain shareholders AU$4.43 per share, or $2.85 in American money.

The deal is subject to the approval of Domain shareholders — including controlling shareholder Nine Entertainment Co. Holdings, which has 60.1% of ordinary shares — and the approval of Australia’s government and court system. Nine Entertainment, which owns Australian newspapers The Age and Australian Financial Review, has agreed to vote in support of CoStar’s purchase.

“We’re pleased to have reached an agreement with Domain and to see Nine’s support of this transformative transaction,” Andy Florance, CoStar founder and CEO, said in a statement. “As one of the first and most experienced digital real estate companies in the world, CoStar Group brings a proven track record of building high-traffic online marketplaces that deliver real value. With our technology, scale and the innovation we’re known for, we see a tremendous opportunity to enhance the Australian property market.”

Based in Sydney, Domain owns several property brands, including Domain, Allhomes, Commercial Real Estate, Domain Insight and Pricefinder. Domain’s shareholders are set to vote on the proposal in mid-August, and subject to their approval and the Australian government’s approval, the deal is expected to close in the third quarter of 2025, according to CoStar.

Costar’s Homes.com brand retained second place in the nation for residential real estate listings based on monthly unique visitors, Florance said in an earnings call earlier this month.

CoStar has more than 6,800 employees across 72 offices in 13 countries. The company established a global operations center in in 2016 and has since grown that office to over 2,350 employees, becoming one of the area’s larger employers. CoStar announced it will complete a 1 million-square-foot Richmond campus redevelopment project along the James River in May 2026 that will house 3,500 employees. This year, the company moved its headquarters from Washington, D.C., to Arlington.

University of Richmond office hires CIO for endowment, assets

Karen Horn Welch will become of , the investment office that manages the ‘s endowment and assets, on July 1, the university announced this week.

, the office’s current president and CIO, will remain president through the end of 2026, when he will retire.

Joining Spider Management in 2016, Welch worked first as a portfolio director and was promoted to managing director of investments. In 2024, she was named deputy CIO.

Spider Management promotes itself as the first university-owned investment office to provide its services to nonaffiliated endowments and foundations. It manages about $6 billion, a university spokesperson said, including about $3 billion in UR’s endowment. The spokesperson declined to identify the more than two dozen nonprofit organizations that work with Spider Management.

“Karen’s promotion to the CIO role is part of a strategic succession plan that the University of leadership and Spider board have developed over several years,” said Hiter Harris, managing director of  investment bank Harris Williams and chair of the university’s investment committee, said in a news release. “I am confident Karen will continue Spider Management’s history of excellence.”

McLean joined Spider Management in 2021 as president and chief investment officer. He previously served as vice president and chief investment officer of Northwestern University’s endowment for close to two decades.