Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Virginians bet $7.68B on sports in 2025, up 10.9%

Virginia sports bettors wagered $7.68 billion in 2025, said Friday, based on information from the . That’s up 10.9% from 2024’s $6.93 billion in sports bets.

revenue for 2025 was $787 million, up 27.4% from the year before. For 2025, the state received $118 million in , compared with $91.7 million in 2024.

“In 2025, Virginians wagered enough to circle the commonwealth thousands of times over,” BetVirginia analyst Jim Tomlin said in a statement. “Nearly $7.7 billion in bets shows sports betting here isn’t a side activity anymore; it’s a major lane in the state’s economy.”

The 27.4% rise in revenue tells “a clear story,” Tomlin added. “The market isn’t just getting bigger;, it’s getting more profitable for operators and state coffers.”

The state lottery announced Friday that Virginians bet $710 million in December 2025 alone — including $705 million on mobile and $5.6 million in — and bettors won a total of $627 million last month.

Just for online sports betting, December 2025 wagering was down more than $24 million from December 2024, according to BetVirginia.

Numbers last month were also down from November 2025, when Virginians bet $798 million on apps and at casinos, compared with $710 million in December 2025, an 11% decrease.

“After a November packed with football weekends and rivalry games, December hit the brakes,” Tomlin said. “The dip wasn’t about fading interest; it was about fewer marquee moments on the Virginia sports calendar, especially with the Washington Commanders out of playoff contention.”

Virginia has taxes of 15% on sports betting, based on each permit holder’s adjusted gross revenue (AGR), defined as total wagers minus total winning and other authorized deductions. In December 2025, the AGR was $79.2 million, producing $11.9 million in taxes.

Under state law, 97.5% of the total taxes go to the state’s general fund, and the other 2.5% goes to the state’s Problem Treatment and Support Fund.

RTX subsidiary wins $1B Army contract

The has awarded , a subsidiary of Fortune 500 aerospace and defense contractor , a $1.025 billion modification to support production of the Lower Tier Air and Missile Defense Sensor (LTAMDS).

According to RTX, the sensor is a radar tool designed to defeat advanced and next-generation threats such as hypersonic weapons. It has three antenna arrays that work together to detect and engage multiple threats from any direction at the same time.

The on Thursday announced the contract would support year two production. Work would be performed in Andover, Massachusetts, with an estimated completion date of March 31, 2030. The Army Contracting Command, based in Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, paid $254.57 million of the $1.025 billion total at the time of the award.

The latest contract modification builds upon a $2.09 billion contract Raytheon was awarded by the Army in July 2024 for low-rate initial production of the sensor, as well as a $1.7 billion award in August 2025.

RTX has more than 185,000 employees globally and reported more than $80.73 billion in 2024 sales. The contractor is the second-highest-ranked Virginia-based company on the 2025 Fortune 500. RTX’s Raytheon business unit is also based in .

Trump picks former Fed official Warsh to run Fed

Summary

  • Trump nominated former Fed governor to lead the central bank
  • Warsh is a frequent Fed critic who has called for major policy changes
  • Nomination faces uncertainty in a closely divided Senate
  • Markets rose as investors weighed Warsh’s views on

WASHINGTON, Jan 30 (Reuters) – President Donald Trump on Friday chose former Governor Kevin Warsh to head the U.S. central bank when Jerome Powell’s leadership term ends in May, giving a frequent Fed critic a chance to put his idea of “regime change” into practice at a moment when the White House has pushed for more control over the setting of interest rates.

“I have known Kevin for a long period of time, and have no doubt that he will go down as one of the GREAT Fed Chairmen, maybe the best. On top of everything else, he is ‘central casting, and he will never let you down,” Trump said in announcing his latest move to put his stamp on a Fed he persistently criticizes for not caving to his demands for deep reductions in borrowing costs.

Global stocks edged higher while the dollar rose and the price of gold plunged after Trump announced his pick of Warsh, who markets perceive as someone who would support lower rates but who would stop well short of the more aggressive easing associated with some of the other potential nominees.

Trump announced the nomination, which requires confirmation by the U.S. Senate, in a post on social media. No public events have been listed on the president’s schedule for Friday involving the Fed.

How quickly Warsh’s nomination gets through a closely divided Senate is unclear. One key Republican on the Senate Banking Committee, which will be the first body to review the nomination, already has repeated an earlier vow not to support any nominee to the Fed as long as Trump’s Department of Justice continues with a criminal probe of Powell that became public earlier this month.

“My position has not changed: I will oppose the confirmation of any Federal Reserve nominee, including for the position of Chairman, until the DOJ’s inquiry into Chairman Powell is fully and transparently resolved,” Senator Thom Tillis of North Carolina said in a post on X.

With Republicans holding a 13-11 majority on the committee and all Democrats likely to oppose Warsh’s nomination, Tillis could deadlock the panel if he maintains his current position.

Other Republican senators on the panel, however, said Warsh would be good for Fed independence.

“No one is better suited to steer the Fed and refocus our central bank on its core statutory mandate,” Senator Bill Hagerty said in a social media post.

The Fed has long been seen as a stabilizing force in global financial markets due in no small part to its perceived independence from politics, and Trump’s escalating efforts to test that independence will be a key issue through the approval process.

It has also opened the door to the possibility that Powell, who called the criminal probe a pretext to pressure the Fed into setting monetary policy as the president wishes, may opt to stay on at the Fed as a governor even after his term as central bank chief is up in a bid to safeguard it from political capture.

The nomination caps a months-long process that often resembled a public audition as Warsh, White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett and other top contenders – including sitting Fed Governor Christopher Waller and insider Rick Rieder – appeared regularly on television to tout their credentials and showcase their thoughts about the economy and Fed policy.

Trump in August named White House economic adviser Stephen Miran to fill a vacant governor’s seat on the Fed, where he has become a leading proponent of the aggressive rate cuts that Trump has long sought. Trump has also tried to force out Fed Governor Lisa Cook in a battle now before the Supreme Court that, if successful, would mark the first time a president has ever fired a U.S. central bank policymaker.

WARSH FAVORS BROAD OVERHAUL OF CENTRAL BANK

While Warsh, 55, is no White House insider, he has been a confidant of the president and a guest at the president’s Florida estate, and looks poised to push many of Trump’s priorities as a “shadow” Fed chief until Powell’s tenure in the top job ends in mid-May.

A lawyer and distinguished visiting fellow in at Stanford University’s Hoover Institution, Warsh has said he believes the president is right to press the Fed for steep rate cuts, and has criticized the central bank for underestimating the inflation-busting potential of productivity growth supercharged by artificial intelligence.

He has also called for a broad overhaul of the central bank that would slim its balance sheet and ease bank regulations.

Warsh was nearly named to the job in Trump’s first term before being passed over for Powell, and since then has kept a steady public profile through speeches and essays that have taken Powell and his colleagues to task for their management of the Fed’s balance sheet, interest rates and other actions.

He now will be responsible for an institution he has said should scale back its footprint in the economy and change the way it manages monetary policy.

It is not clear how the pick may affect the trajectory of rates in the short term. The Fed’s three rate cuts in 2025 brought its benchmark interest rate to the 3.50%-3.75% range. Earlier this week, citing stronger growth and a stabilizing , it left rates on hold and signaled a pause ahead; markets for now don’t expect another rate cut until the June 16-17 meeting, when Powell’s successor is expected to be in place.

With a background on Wall Street, including as a partner in the office managing the wealth of investing giant Stanley Druckenmiller, and family ties to major Trump supporter Ron Lauder, Warsh will be under an intense spotlight to prove his independence from the president.

As a Fed governor from 2006 to 2011, Warsh’s familiarity with Wall Street executives and investors made him a chief liaison to the financial community for then-Fed Chair Ben Bernanke during the 2007-2009 financial crisis.

Though he did not dissent against the massive bond purchases Bernanke used to nurse the economy out of what proved a long downturn, he was concerned they would stoke inflation and eventually resigned. Warsh’s inflation concerns proved misplaced, but the large size of the Fed’s balance sheet, and the role it plays in managing interest rates, remain a concern.

He now argues that shrinking the Fed’s big balance sheet would allow it to “redeploy” excess liquidity in financial markets to the real economy by lowering the central bank’s policy rate.

(Reporting by Susan Heavey and Ann Saphir; Additional reporting by Bo Erickson and Andrea Shalal; Editing by Dan Burns, Andrea Ricci, Hugh Lawson and Paul Simao)

Stocks slip as Microsoft drags, oil jumps on Iran attack worry

Summary

  • Global shares fell, snapping a six-session winning streak
  • Microsoft shares plunged 10%, dragging down U.S.
  • surged on concerns over rising
  • Gold hit a record high as investors sought safe-haven assets

NEW YORK, Jan 29 (Reuters) – Global shares dipped on Thursday and were poised to snap a six-session streak of gains, weighed down by a plunge in Microsoft after its quarterly results, while oil prices jumped on U.S.-Iran tensions.

On , the S&P 500 and Nasdaq fell, dragged lower by a drop of 10% in Microsoft shares, its biggest daily percentage drop since March 2020, as investors were unnerved by record spending on artificial intelligence last quarter, which also fueled weakness in other tech stocks.

That overshadowed a 10.4% gain in Meta Platforms after its quarterly results and illustrated how investors are willing to forgive massive AI spending as long as it is accompanied by strong growth.

Fellow “Magnificent Seven” member Tesla lost 3.5% after reporting earnings while Apple is scheduled to post results after the closing bell.

“Microsoft disappointed and there are some genuine concerns that AI investments will eat the software companies’ lunches,” said John Praveen, managing director, Paleo Leon in Princeton, New Jersey.

The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 55.96 points, or 0.11%, to 49,071.56, the S&P 500 fell 9.02 points, or 0.13%, to 6,969.01 and the Nasdaq Composite fell 172.33 points, or 0.72%, to 23,685.12.

Of the 133 companies in the S&P 500 that have reported earnings, 74.4% have topped expectations, according to LSEG data, above the 67% beat rate since 1994 but below the 78% over the past four quarters.

MSCI’s gauge of stocks across the globe slipped 0.87 point, or 0.08%, to 1,050.80, its first decline after six sessions of gains, while the pan-European STOXX 600 index closed down 0.23% as a drop in technology names outweighed gains in mining and energy stocks due to a 16% plummet in SAP as its cloud revenue forecast fell short of expectations.

“So the momentum is completely out of tech and people are looking elsewhere, right now it’s metals in terms of pure momentum, but if you’re focused on valuation, there’s just a ton of opportunities,” said Jay Hatfield, CEO and CIO of Infrastructure Capital Advisors in New York.

The dollar index, which measures the greenback against a basket of currencies, edged up 0.06% to 96.22, its second straight daily advance after a recent bout of weakness, with the euro up 0.08% at $1.1962.

The dollar was supported in part by Wednesday’s decision by the to leave unchanged, with Chair Jerome Powell citing a solid economy and lowered risks to both inflation and employment, indicating the central bank could have a long runway before cutting rates again.

U.S. on Thursday showed weekly initial fell, indicating remained low, although soft hiring kept consumers pessimistic about the .

Oil prices surged, with U.S. crude settled up 3.5% to $65.42 a barrel and Brent jumped to settle at $70.71 per barrel, up 3.38% on the day after climbing more than 5% on concerns about possible U.S. military strikes on Iran.

The geopolitical tensions helped keep upward pressure on gold, which hit a record of $5,594.82 an ounce, its ninth straight record high. Gains faded as investors took profits after the run higher. Spot gold was last off 0.18% to $5,389.19 an ounce, but still on pace for its biggest monthly percentage gain since 1980.

(Reporting by Chuck Mikolajczak, additional reporting by Sinéad Carew in New York, Pranav Kashyap and Twesha Dikshit in Bengaluru, Tom Wilson in London and Wayne Cole in Sydney; Editing byJane Merriman and Andrew Heavens, Kirsten Donovan)

 

Virginia not in recession, experts say, but significant challenges remain

SUMMARY:

  • Virginia’s economy faced significant headwinds in 2025 and is expected to grow only modestly in 2026
  • The state’s rate rose last year but remains below national average
  • Job losses hit federal, hospitality, and professional and business services sectors the hardest

An economic report from ‘s notes that Virginia is not yet in a recession, but that doesn’t mean it’s all sunshine and rainbows for state’s economy.

The report, authored by economists Bob McNab and Vinod Agarwal and released Wednesday, provided an overview of Virginia’s 2025 economic trends and made predictions for what is to come.

“My personal opinion is that we’re not in a recession yet, but we’re looking over the cliff at one,” McNab said.

The report notes that the state’s gross domestic product growth slowed in 2025 and is expected to remain anemic this year due to federal , cuts, higher , changes in immigration policy and general uncertainty. The state’s GDP growth in 2025 was 1.2%, down from 2024’s 2.4%. The report forecasts 1% GDP growth in 2026.

Unemployment rises

The civilian labor force dipped to about 4.527 million by December 2025, down 71,634 from the approximately 4.598 million in December 2024. In 2024, the state’s civilian labor force increased each month of the year, whereas last year it decreased each month.

Citing data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics, the report noted that the state’s was 3.6% in December 2025, lower than the national average of 4.4% for December 2025, but significantly higher than Virginia’s unemployment rate of 2.9% in December 2024. McNab predicts the unemployment rate will continue to climb.

Joseph Mengedoth, a regional economist at the , emphasized that although the state’s unemployment rate is higher than in 2018 and 2019, when the rates were below 3%, they are favorable compared to around 2015 and 2016, when the unemployment rate was around 4%. He compiled an economic snapshot for the Fed’s Fifth District, which includes Virginia, released this week.

“And 4% is sort of where, for a long time, economists have said, that’s sort of the natural rate of unemployment for just people moving in and out of the labor force,” Mengedoth said. “So still, I think Virginia’s unemployment rate situation is not that bad.”

McNab noted that many Virginians who left the labor force in 2025 may have left the state entirely, meaning they are not counted in the state’s unemployment figures.

“If they had remained in the labor force and were treated as unemployed, our unemployment rate would be closer to 4% than 3.6%,” he said. “So those discouraged workers, those people who are detaching themselves from the labor force and exiting entirely, are no longer counted in the calculation of the unemployment rate.”

Data from the Richmond Fed suggests another factor may be at play with the unemployment rate: retirement. Mengedoth said declining labor force participation in Virginia might indicate older workers leaving the workforce rather than being laid off.

“If all these folks were leaving employment and ending up unemployed, we would see that spike even more,” he said. “And we’re not really seeing that.”

Except for January and July, federal civilian payrolls declined each month in 2025, with the largest drop in October, a loss of 11,400 jobs. The October spike showed the departure of tens of thousands of federal workers who had accepted a deferred resignation package earlier in 2025.

There was a loss of 23,900 federal jobs in Virginia last year, followed by 12,700 in the leisure and hospitality industry, 7,900 in professional and business services and 5,900 in manufacturing. McNab said declines in international travel are the likely culprit in the harm to the leisure and hospitality industry.

There were 20,324 unemployment claims for the week of Jan. 17, up from 16,426 for the same week in 2025 and 13,351 for the same week in 2024.

Other economic concerns

The Dragas report said that higher U.S. tariffs lowered employment in manufacturing, increased tariffs on U.S. exports, and reduced real GDP growth. It also cited findings from the Kiel Institute, which estimated that 96% of U.S. tariffs were passed through to American consumers and businesses.

The report said the percentage of the total number of 20-foot equivalent units (TEUs) loaded at the Port of Virginia declined each month in 2025 compared to 2024, except in March and October.

McNab said 2025 was not a good year economically, and that the state experienced “significant headwinds.” He forecasts that there will still be slow growth in 2026, but that the number of jobs will largely stay around the same.

Mengedoth described Virginia’s economy as in a “low hire, low fire” phase, with businesses largely holding staffing steady rather than expanding or downsizing aggressively. He said many employers are allowing headcounts to drift down through attrition while testing productivity gains from artificial intelligence, rather than adding workers.

McNab said growth will primarily depend on higher-income households, which make up more than 50% of consumption in the United States.

“If the stock market continues to increase, if property values continue to increase, economic activity will continue to grow,” McNab said. “However, the danger is given increasing levels of federal debt, given that we’ve seen international investors become increasingly reluctant to buy treasuries or sell treasuries, right because of political uncertainty, that recovery is increasingly sensitive and uncertain.”

US weekly jobless claims fall; trade deficit widens by the most in nearly 34 years

Summary

  • Initial fell to 209,000 in the latest week
  • remain low, with most workforce reductions via attrition
  • Hiring remains sluggish, stoking consumer anxiety
  • Fed says appears to be stabilizing

WASHINGTON, Jan 29 (Reuters) – The number of Americans filing new applications for benefits fell last week from an upwardly revised level in the prior week, suggesting layoffs remained low, but tepid hiring is stoking households’ anxiety about the labor market.

While difficulties adjusting the weekly unemployment claims data for seasonal fluctuations around the year-end holiday season and turn of the year have injected volatility into the numbers, economists said there has been no material change in labor market conditions.

Chair Jerome Powell told reporters on Wednesday that “labor market indicators suggest that conditions may be stabilizing after a period of gradual softening.” The U.S. central bank left its benchmark overnight interest rate in the 3.50%-3.75% range.

“There is no evidence that layoffs are picking up. There are firms that are trying to reduce their headcount, but this is being done almost exclusively through attrition rather than outright ,” said Stephen Stanley, chief U.S. economist at Santander U.S. Capital Markets. “Layoffs on an underlying basis are roughly steady.”

Initial claims for state unemployment benefits dropped 1,000 to a seasonally adjusted 209,000 for the week ended January 24, the Labor Department said on Thursday. The prior week’s level of claims was revised up by 10,000 to 210,000.

Economists polled by Reuters had forecast 205,000 claims for the latest week. The claims data included last Monday’s Martin Luther King Jr. holiday. Claims tend to be noisy around public holidays. More volatility is likely in the weeks ahead after a winter storm brought snow and freezing temperatures to a large part of the country over the weekend.

Economists say companies are reluctant to lay off workers while assessing what they have called an ever-shifting economic landscape, mostly related to on imports.

United Parcel Service and Amazon.com announced job cuts this week, but those layoffs will probably not have a significant impact on claims. High-profile layoffs last year, including from those two companies, did not result in a notable surge in jobless claims.

Stocks on were trading lower. The dollar fell against a basket of currencies. Longer-dated U.S. Treasury yields rose.

CONSUMERS PESSIMISTIC ABOUT LABOR MARKET

The number of people receiving unemployment benefits after an initial week of aid, a proxy for hiring, decreased 38,000 to a seasonally adjusted 1.827 million during the week ended January 17, the claims report showed.

The so-called continuing claims figures also have been impacted by the seasonal adjustment challenges.

Some economists believe continuing claims were being pushed lower by people dropping off unemployment rolls because they had exhausted their eligibility for benefits, limited to 26 weeks in most states. Others viewed the third straight weekly decline as consistent with the low level of layoffs.

Continuing claims covered the period during which the government surveyed households for January’s .

The jobless rate slipped to 4.4% in December from 4.5% in November. Unemployment has been prevalent among young adults, most of whom do not qualify for benefits because they have never worked or have a limited employment history.

The unemployment rate likely remained elevated this month. The Conference Board’s employment measures deteriorated in January. Economists attributed tepid hiring to tariffs and immigration raids that have reduced demand and supply of labor as well as businesses being uncertain of their staffing needs as they invest heavily in artificial intelligence.

“We should still be concerned about the possibility of rising unemployment, though the drop in claims remains a positive leading signal if sustained,” said Abiel Reinhart, an economist at J.P. Morgan.

The Chicago Fed is forecasting the unemployment rate for January will be 4.35%, which would round up to 4.4%.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics’ closely watched employment report for January, scheduled for release next Friday, could be delayed if the government shuts down again over the weekend due to an impasse over funding for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security. Democrats in the U.S. Senate have demanded new restrictions on DHS enforcement efforts following a second fatal shooting by federal agents in Minneapolis recently.

Congress faces a January 30 deadline to fund the government or risk a partial government shutdown. A shutdown would not affect data releases from the Commerce Department’s statistical agencies, which are funded through September 30.

The Bureau of Economic Analysis and Census Bureau reported that the trade deficit widened by 94.6%, the largest increase since March 1992, to $56.8 billion in November amid a surge in capital goods imports that was likely driven by an AI investment boom.

Economists had forecast the trade deficit would rise to $40.5 billion. The deterioration in the trade deficit prompted the Atlanta Fed to slash its fourth-quarter GDP growth estimate to a 4.2% annualized rate from a 5.4% pace. Goldman Sachs lowered its forecast to a 2.0% rate from a 2.4% pace.

Trade contributed to GDP growth in the second and third quarters of 2025. The economy grew at a 4.4% pace in the July-September quarter. The trade report was delayed because of the U.S. government shutdown late last year.

Imports jumped 5.0% to $348.9 billion. Goods imports advanced 6.6% to $272.5 billion, with capital goods soaring $7.4 billion to a record high. They were boosted by strong gains in imports of computers and semiconductors. But imports of computer accessories decreased by $3.0 billion.

Consumer goods imports increased by $9.2 billion, lifted by pharmaceutical preparations. There have been large swings in imports of pharmaceutical preparations, likely related to U.S. tariffs. Imports of industrial supplies fell by $2.4 billion.

Exports tumbled 3.6% to $292.1 billion. Goods exports plunged 5.6% to $185.6 billion, pulled down by a decline of $6.1 billion in shipments of industrial supplies and materials amid decreases in non-monetary gold, other precious metals as well as crude oil, which dropped by $1.4 billion.

Consumer goods exports decreased $3.1 billion as pharmaceutical preparations shipments fell. The goods trade deficit widened 47.3% to $86.9 billion. Imports of services fell, while exports in that category were the highest on record.

“It remains to be seen where imports settle after seeing some pull-forward earlier in the year ahead of tariffs and then some payback since,” said Shannon Grein, an economist at Wells Fargo. “There has been little indication yet of a large onshoring of operations in the wake of tariffs, which suggests import growth will likely recover somewhat this year as businesses rebuild some inventory to meet demand.”

(Reporting by Lucia Mutikani; Editing by Chizu Nomiyama and Paul Simao)

 

Dow to cut 4,500 jobs, forecasts weak revenue amid sluggish demand

Jan 29 (Reuters) – Dow will slash about 4,500 jobs, or 13% of its total workforce, under a sweeping restructuring aimed at boosting profitability by at least $2 billion, while projecting first-quarter revenue below expectations on stubbornly weak demand.

Shares of the company fell 5.8% in morning trading on Thursday.

The will also reduce third-party roles and resources, executives said on a post-earnings call, as the company streamlines all its end-to-end work processes by using automation and AI to lower costs and improve efficiency.

Global chemical producers are reassessing their strategies amid stagnant demand, rising production costs in Europe, changing regulatory requirements and persistent global oversupply.

Dow, which began a strategic review of some European assets in 2024, has also been re-evaluating its ownership of non-core assets across its global portfolio, including power and steam production and pipelines.

CEO Jim Fitterling said the company expects to deliver by the end of the year the remaining more than $500 million in cost savings from its previously announced $1 billion program.

Dow, which operates sites in 29 countries and employs about 34,600 people, expects to incur about $1.1 billion to $1.5 billion in one-time costs tied to the restructuring in 2026 and 2027.

The company did not detail which business units or sites will be affected by the planned job reductions.

DOWNBEAT REVENUE EXPECTATIONS

The company forecast first-quarter net sales of $9.4 billion, below analysts’ average estimate of $10.33 billion, according to data compiled by LSEG.

Dow said modest seasonal demand improvements and benefits from cost controls during the quarter could be offset by planned maintenance and continued downward pressure, especially in the building and construction market.

The Michigan-based company reported a smaller-than-expected adjusted loss of 34 cents per share, compared with analysts’ average estimate of a loss of 46 cents.

(Reporting by Pooja Menon in Bengaluru; Editing by Sriraj Kalluvila)

 

El Salvador signs trade agreement with US

SAN SALVADOR, Jan 29 (Reuters) – has signed a trade agreement with the United States, El Salvador’s ambassador to the U.S. Milena Mayorga said on Thursday, without adding details on the content of the deal.

In a statement last November, the U.S. embassy said it was working on a reciprocal trade deal with the Central American nation under which El Salvador would address “non-tariff” barriers, including simplifying regulation for U.S. imports.

This included accepting U.S. standards for U.S. vehicle safety, motor emissions, medical devices and pharmaceuticals, it said in a statement, adding that El Salvador also committed to easing rules regarding agricultural imports, it said, including less restrictions for U.S. cheese and meats.

The U.S., meanwhile, would remove on some Salvadoran imports such as clothes and goods not produced in sufficient quantities within the U.S., the embassy said in November.

El Salvador already has provisions for free trade with the United States along with much of Central America and the Dominican Republic under the trade pact.

Salvadoran President posted a photo of delegates from both countries holding signed documents, saying this marked “the first in the entire Western Hemisphere.”

The Western Hemisphere has long counted a number of free trade pacts.

Separately on Thursday, Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum held a call with U.S. President Donald Trump, during which she said they had discussed progress on the review of the USMCA free trade pact between the two nations and Canada.

(Reporting by Aida Pelaez-Fernandez and Nelson Renteria; Writing by Sarah Morland;)

 

Developer withdraws Hanover data center campus proposal

Developer withdrew its application for a 10-building data center campus in , supervisors announced Wednesday night.

was recommended for denial by the county Planning Commission on Jan. 15. The project, set to be built on the Hanover-Henrico county line near western Henrico’s Wyndham neighborhood, drew opposition from Hanover, Henrico and Goochland county residents, some of whom spoke at the Planning Commission meeting.

Increased traffic, water use, noise and other environmental impacts were among the concerns.

HHHunt, which has corporate headquarters in Blackburg, Glen Allen and Cary, North Carolina, sought to rezone the 468-acre property from agricultural use to light industrial use to allow the project to move forward.

A November 2025 presentation by the developer said that the project would include 10 buildings as large as 330,000 square feet each, three electrical substations to connect the to the power grid, plus perimeter buffers and landscaping. The project was not set to include a wastewater treatment plant or on-site power generation.

According to HHHunt’s estimates, the county would have received about $6.5 million in annual from 2026 to 2036, the project’s completion date, and after 2036, the average revenue for the county would be about $11.9 million a year.

“I just want to take an opportunity to let everyone know that myself and the planning director were notified this afternoon of the withdrawal of the proposed data center along Ashland Road,” Susan Dibble, Hanover’s South Anna District supervisor, said at Wednesday night’s meeting, when supervisors also issued a statement opposing U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement’s plan for a detainee processing facility in Hanover.

Dibble’s announcement drew loud applause from the audience.

She noted the site was near a golf course and said the proposal was “simply not a good project in the right place.”  She added that the project was not in compliance with the county’s comprehensive plan, and there was no way to get beyond that.

“All along my seven years sitting in this seat, I have told people how much I believe in the process that we have,” Dibble said. “I believe it’s transparent, and I also believe that … this process that we have, which includes community meetings and a lot of public input, makes a good project better, and it weeds out the bad projects, and we have weeded out this one.”

HHHunt did not immediately respond to requests for comment Thursday.

Bill seeks to overhaul VMI governance board 

Summary 

  • Legislation would dissolve VMI’s board of visitors
  • Oversight would shift to ‘s board
  • Bill follows years of political clashes over VMI governance
  • Lawmakers, VMI and VSU offer limited immediate response

(USA Today Network) A Virginia Beach delegate introduced legislation that would dissolve the board of visitors at and transfer governance of the Lexington school to Virginia State University 159 miles away in Petersburg. 

House Bill 1374 would keep VMI as a separate college from VSU. However, it would be “under the supervision, management, and control of the board of visitors of Virginia State University,” the bill states. 

The move is the latest in a series of political struggles involving the current , state Senate Democrats and former Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin. Last year, Democrats blocked two of Youngkin’s appointees to the VMI Board of Visitors, claiming they catered to the generally conservative alumni donors instead of what Democrats maintained were the “true values” of the 186-year-old school, the nation’s oldest state-supported military college. 

Shortly after assuming office, Virginia Gov. Abigail Spanberger, a Democrat, reshuffled the boards at VMI, the University of Virginia and George Mason University, appointing 27 new members. One of the new selections for VMI’s board was former Gov. Ralph Northam, a VMI grad. 

The bill’s sponsor, Democratic Del. , said in a statement released by his office that his legislation is more structural than punitive. 

“This legislation is about governance and the ‘s responsibility to ensure that public institutions are overseen in a manner that reflects stability, accountability, and sound judgment,” he said. “The bill restructures Virginia Military Institute’s governance by placing it under the oversight of the Virginia State University Board of Visitors, while preserving VMI’s mission, military structure, and academic role.” 

Feggans added that the bill “reflects broader, longstanding concerns about whether VMI’s current governance structure meets” Virginia higher education standards. 

“When patterns of governance issues arise, it is appropriate for the General Assembly to review and, if necessary, adjust oversight structures,” Feggans said. 

As for why VSU, a historically Black university that’s a two-and-a-half-hour drive southeast of Lexington, was chosen, Feggans did not disclose the reason. Washington and Lee University, which adjoins VMI’s campus in Lexington, is a private university. 

The legislation was introduced Jan. 20 and is awaiting House committee assignment. 

In a statement, VMI said it was reviewing legislation from the “robust agenda” that lawmakers have for the school this session, including Feggans’ bill.  

“We were not aware of his idea until [Jan. 20], and it is not something VMI proposed,” the statement said. “We look forward to discussions with our elected officials as an opportunity to demonstrate the value of VMI. For more than 186 years, VMI has served the commonwealth, producing citizen-soldiers who now lead in all walks of life. There are currently nearly 1,500 cadets at VMI with the same goal.” 

VSU officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment on the bill. 

Several lawmakers seemed surprised by the legislation and deferred immediate reaction. 

At a Jan. 21 news conference announcing the establishment of a Virginia Historically Black Colleges & Universities Caucus, participants were asked for comment on the bill. 

“The patron of that bill is in this room, and I don’t think that anybody has a comment about it,” Sen. Lashrecse Aird, D-Petersburg, a VSU alumna, responded. Others nodded their heads in agreement with her. 

A spokesperson for Del. Mike Cherry, R-Colonial Heights, in whose district VSU is located, said Cherry would have no comment “at this time.” 

Further requests for comment were sought from Sen. Jennifer Carroll Foy, a Prince William County lawmaker and Petersburg native who was among the first women to graduate from VMI; and Spanberger’s office.