Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Post GreenCity, Henrico tries again

Kate Andrews //June 29, 2025//

Post GreenCity, Henrico tries again

Henrico is seeking a new developer for the former Best Products headquarters site. Photo courtesy Henrico Sports & Entertainment Authority

Post GreenCity, Henrico tries again

Henrico is seeking a new developer for the former Best Products headquarters site. Photo courtesy Henrico Sports & Entertainment Authority

Post GreenCity, Henrico tries again

Kate Andrews //June 29, 2025//

Summary

  • Henrico opens new call for arena-anchored development plans
  • project collapsed amid lawsuits and unpaid land fees
  • Selected proposal expected by December; land transfer set for Jan. 2026
  • Property zoning allows mix of retail, hotel, residential, and office space
  • Legal dispute continues over $1M repurchase and property title

Following the collapse of the $2.3 billion GreenCity project, released in May a new call for developers to submit plans for an arena-anchored development.

Developers must submit their plans by July 28, and supervisors are expected to approve the chosen plan in December. After that, the 93-acre property would be conveyed to the winning development team in January 2026, with a 17,000-capacity arena expected to open in 2028.

The request for interest came while the developers of the failed GreenCity project are being sued by the Henrico County Authority and , the company that was set to operate the GreenCity arena.

In 2022, the county agreed to sell the property to the developers for $6.2 million, and the sale took place on Feb. 28, 2023.

After paying the county $1 million on time, the developers failed to pay the remaining $5.2 million due Feb. 28, the county’s complaint says, and the developers went into default March 13. At that point, Henrico said it would exercise its repurchase option on April 15, paying back the $1 million to the developers in return for the land.

But in a separate lawsuit, ASM Global claimed the developers owed an ASM subsidiary more than $1.5 million, and a Henrico County Circuit Court judge issued a summons to the EDA in April, seeking to garnish the $1 million repurchase fee. The developers filed a motion to vacate the judgment, and they’ve “refused to convey the property to the EDA … unless ASM agrees that the EDA may pay some or all of the repurchase price to [the developers] rather than to ASM,” Henrico says in its complaint.

, executive director of the Henrico Authority, confirmed May 27 that the county has not yet received the land.

Despite the legal turmoil, “I think there’s a high level of excitement to get this restarted,” Bickmeier says.

The property is zoned as a conditional urban mixed-use district that would allow development of an arena, office and retail space, hotels and residential units, giving prospective developers creative freedom, Bickmeier says.

Construction of residences on the adjoining 110 acres, known as Scott Farm, is set to start later this year, under the development of a Markel|Eagle Partners subsidiary, the county says.

i
YOUR NEWS.
YOUR INBOX.
DAILY.

By subscribing you agree to our Privacy Policy.