Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

US enters 90-day negotiating period with Mexico as 25% tariffs stay in place

 

SUMMARY: 

  • U.S. and Mexico enter 90-day trade negotiation period 
  • Trump keeps 25% on autos, 50% on metals from Mexico 
  • Sheinbaum says talks averted a tariff hike for 90 days 
  • Trump criticizes as trade gap with Mexico widens 

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States will enter a 90-day negotiating period with Mexico over trade as 25% tariff rates stay in place, President said Thursday.

Trump, posting on his Truth Social platform, said a phone conversation he had with Mexican leader was “very successful in that, more and more, we are getting to know and understand each other.”

The Republican president said that goods from Mexico imported into the U.S. would continue to face a 25% tariff that he has ostensibly linked to fentanyl trafficking. He said that autos would face a 25% tariff, while copper, aluminum and steel would be taxed at 50%.

He said that Mexico would end its “Non Tariff Trade Barriers,” but he didn’t provide specifics.

Trump had threatened tariffs of 30% on goods from Mexico in a July letter, something that Sheinbaum said Mexico gets to stave off for the next three months.

“We avoided the tariff increase announced for tomorrow and we got 90 days to build a long-term agreement through dialogue,” Sheinbaum wrote on X.

Some goods continue to be protected from the tariffs by the 2020 U.S. Mexico Canada Agreement, or USMCA, which Trump negotiated during his first term.

But Trump appeared to have soured on that deal, which is up for renegotiation next year. One of his first significant moves as president was to tariff goods from both Mexico and Canada earlier this year.

Census Bureau figures show that the U.S. ran a $171.5 billion trade imbalance with Mexico last year. That means the U.S. bought more goods from Mexico than it sold to the country.

The imbalance with Mexico has grown in the aftermath of the USMCA as it was only $63.3 billion in 2016, the year before Trump started his first term in office.

Besides addressing fentanyl trafficking, Trump has made it a goal to close the trade gap.

Trump administration cancels plans to develop new offshore wind projects

 

SUMMARY: 

  • rescinds 3.5M acres for wind development 
  • Bureau of Ocean Energy halts lease designations 
  • Wind energy policies reversed in favor of fossil fuels 
  • 17 states and D.C. sue over blocking leases 

 

The Trump administration is canceling plans to use large areas of for new offshore wind development, the latest step to suppress the industry in the United States.

More than 3.5 million acres had been designated wind energy areas, the offshore locations deemed most suitable for wind energy development. The is now rescinding all designated wind energy areas in federal waters, announcing on Wednesday an end to setting aside large areas for “speculative wind development.”

Offshore wind lease sales were anticipated off the coasts of Texas, Louisiana, Maine, New York, California and Oregon, as well as in the central Atlantic. The Biden administration last year had announced a five-year schedule to lease federal offshore tracts for wind energy production.

Trump began reversing the country’s energy policies after taking office in January. A series of executive orders took aim at increasing oil, gas and coal production.

The Republican president has been hostile to , particularly offshore wind. One early executive order temporarily halted offshore wind lease sales in federal waters and paused the issuance of approvals, permits and loans for all wind projects. In trying to make a case against wind energy, he has relied on false and misleading claims about the use of wind power in the U.S. and around the world.

The bureau said it was acting in accordance with Trump’s action and an order by his interior secretary this week to end any preferential treatment toward wind and solar facilities, which were described as unreliable, foreign-controlled energy sources.

Robin Shaffer, president of Protect Our Coast New Jersey, applauded the administration for its actions and said they were long overdue. Opponents of offshore wind projects are particularly vocal and well-organized in New Jersey.

“It’s hard to believe these projects ever got this far because of the immensity, scale, scope and expense, compared to relatively cheap and reliable forms of onshore power,” he said Thursday. “We’re nearly there, but we haven’t reached the finish line yet.”

Attorneys general from 17 states and the District of Columbia are suing in federal court to challenge Trump’s executive order halting leasing and permitting for wind energy projects. His administration had also halted work on a major offshore wind project for New York, but allowed it to resume in May.

The nation’s first commercial-scale offshore wind farm, a 12-turbine wind farm called South Fork, opened last year east of Montauk Point, New York.

Microsoft’s annual cloud revenue hits $75B, profit beats expectations

Microsoft said Wednesday that annual revenue for its flagship platform has surpassed $75 billion, up 34% from a year earlier.

The Azure cloud business has been a centerpiece of ‘s efforts to shift its focus to artificial intelligence, but until Wednesday the company hadn’t disclosed how much money it makes.

The revelation came in the software giant’s end-of-year . The company also said its fiscal fourth-quarter profit was $34.3 billion, or $3.65 per share, beating analyst expectations for $3.37 per share.

It posted revenue of $76.4 billion in the April-June period, up 18% from last year. Analysts polled by FactSet Research had been looking for revenue of $73.86 billion.

Microsoft launched Azure more than a decade ago, but the product has increasingly become intertwined with its AI ambitions, as the company looks to sell its AI chatbot and other tools to big business customers that are also reliant on its core online services.

But building the infrastructure to power cloud and AI technology is expensive, and Microsoft has looked for savings elsewhere. It has announced  of about 15,000 workers this year even as its profits have soared.

Microsoft CEO Satya Nadella told employees last week the layoffs were “weighing heavily” on him but also positioned them as an opportunity to reimagine the company’s mission for an AI era.

Promises of a leaner approach have been welcomed on Wall Street, especially as Microsoft and other tech giants are trying to justify huge amounts of capital spending to pay for the data centers, chips and other components required to power AI technology.

Google said after releasing its earnings last week it would raise its budget for capital expenditures by an additional $10 billion to $85 billion. Microsoft is expected to outline similar guidance soon.

NTSB finds Army chopper in fatal midair crash with plane was above altitude limit

 

SUMMARY: 

  • Helicopter in January crash was flying above altitude limits 
  • Altitude-measuring equipment was found to be inaccurate 
  • 67 people were killed in the midair collision over D.C. 
  • hearings focus on , Army roles and safety protocols 

 

Investigators probing the January midair collision of a passenger plane and an Army helicopter over Washington that killed 67 people found the chopper was flying higher than it should have been and its altitude readings were inaccurate.

The details came out of the first day of National Transportation Safety Board hearings in Washington, where investigators aim to uncover insights into what caused the crash between the American Airlines plane from Wichita, Kansas, and the Black Hawk helicopter over Ronald Reagan National Airport.

The board opened the three days of hearings by showing an animation and playing audio and video from the night of the collision, as well as questioning witnesses and investigators about how the Federal Aviation Administration and the Army may have contributed to nation’s deadliest plane crash since November 2001.

The board’s final report won’t be released until sometime next year, but it became clear Wednesday how small a margin of error there was for helicopters flying the route the Black Hawk took the night of the nation’s crash.

The January nighttime incident was the first in a string of crashes and near misses this year that have alarmed officials and the traveling public, despite statistics that still show flying remains the safest form of transportation.

Animation, altimeter discrepancy

The hearing opened Wednesday with a video animation showing where the helicopter and airliner were leading up to the collision. It showed how the helicopter flew above the 200 feet (61 meters) altitude limit on the helicopter route along the Potomac River before colliding with the plane.

Investigators said Wednesday the flight data recorder showed the helicopter was actually 80 feet to 100 feet (24 to 30 meters) higher than the barometric altimeter the pilots relied upon showed they were flying. So the NTSB conducted tests on three other helicopters from the same unit in a flight over the same area and found similar discrepancies in their altimeters.

Dan Cooper with Sikorsky helicopters said that when the Black Hawk helicopter involved in the crash was designed in the 1970s, it used a style of altimeter that was common at the time. Newer helicopters have air data computers that didn’t exist back then that help provide more accurate altitude readings.

Chief Warrant Officer Kylene Lewis told the board that she wouldn’t find an 80 to 100 foot discrepancy between the different altimeters on a helicopter alarming because at lower altitudes she would be relying more on the radar altimeter than the barometric altimeter. Below 500 feet (152 meters), Lewis said she would be checking both instruments and cross referencing them.

She said as long as an altimeter registers an altitude within 70 feet of the published altitude before takeoff the altimeter is considered accurate under the checklists.

Army officials said a discrepancy of 70 to 100 feet (21 to 30 meters) between the Black Hawk’s altimeters is within the acceptable range because pilots are expected to maintain their altitude plus or minus 100 feet.

The greater concern is that the FAA approved routes around Reagan airport that included such small separation distances between helicopters and planes when planes are landing.

“The fact that we have less than 500 foot separation is a concern for me,” said Scott Rosengren, chief engineer in the office that manages the Army’s utility helicopters.

But Rosengren said that “if he was king for a day” he would immediately retire all the older Black Hawk models like the one involved in this crash and replace them with newer versions of the helicopters.

Questions over the route

Army officials and the head of a local medevac helicopter company that flies around Washington told the board they believed air traffic controllers would never let them fly the helicopter route involved in the crash anytime a plane was approaching the runway.

Chief Warrant Officer David Van Vetchen said after the crash he talked to many of his fellow pilots and everyone had the same assumption that controllers would never allow them to fly across the path of the runway the American plane was approaching before the crash.

Citing the numbers for runways, Van Vetchen said that “100% of the time when I was on route four and 33/15 was active” he would be instructed to hold until after the plane landed or took off from that runway.

‘Stepped on transmission’

During the two minutes before the crash, one air traffic controller was directing airport traffic and helicopters in the area, a task that involved speaking to or receiving communications from several different aircraft, according to the NTSB’s History of Flight Performance Study.

The air traffic controller had spoken to or received communications from the Black Hawk helicopter, an airplane that was taking off, an Air Force helicopter, an airplane on the ground, a medical helicopter and an inbound flight that was not the American Airlines plane that would crash.

“All aircraft could hear the controller, but helicopters could only hear other helicopters on their frequency and airplanes only other airplanes,” the report stated. “This resulted in a number of stepped on transmissions as helicopters and airplanes were not aware when the other was communicating.”

Stepped on transmissions are those that are unheard or blocked because of other transmissions. The NTSB report provides a list of 29 separate communications between the airport tower and other aircraft during approximately the 1 minute and 57 seconds before the collision.

Previously disclosed air traffic control audio had the helicopter pilot telling the controller twice that they saw the airplane and would avoid it. Officials on Wednesday also raised the use of night vision goggles, which limit the wearer’s field of view, on the helicopter as a factor.

The animation ended with surveillance video showing the helicopter colliding with the plane in a fiery crash.

Investigations have already shown the FAA failed to recognize a troubling history of 85 near misses around Ronald Reagan National Airport in the years before the collision, and that the Army’s helicopters routinely flew around the nation’s capital with a key piece of locating equipment, known as ADS-B Out, turned off.

Proposed changes

U.S. Sen. Ted Cruz, a Republican, introduced legislation Tuesday to require all aircraft operators to use both forms of ADS-B, or Automatic Dependent Surveillance Broadcast, the technology to broadcast aircraft location data to other planes and air traffic controllers. Most aircraft today are equipped with ADS-B Out equipment but the airlines would have to add the more comprehensive ADS-B In technology to their planes.

The legislation would revoke an exemption on ADS-B transmission requests for Department of Defense aircrafts.

Homendy said her agency has been recommending that move for decades after several other crashes.

Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said that while he’d like to discuss “a few tweaks,” the legislation is “the right approach.” He also suggested that the previous administration “was asleep at the wheel” amid dozens of near-misses in the airspace around Washington’s airspace.

Trump announces 25% tariff on India and unspecified penalties for buying Russian oil

 

SUMMARY: 

  • Trump to impose 25% on Indian goods starting Friday 
  • Additional duties tied to ‘s purchases of  
  • India says it’s reviewing the economic impact of the tariffs 
  • between U.S. and India remain ongoing 

 

 WASHINGTON (AP) — The United States will impose a 25% tariff on goods from India, plus an additional import tax because of India’s purchasing of Russian oil, President said Wednesday.

India “is our friend,” Trump said on his Truth Social platform, but its tariffs on U.S. products “are far too high.”

The Republican president added India buys military equipment and oil from Russia, enabling Moscow’s war in Ukraine. As a result, he intends to charge an additional “penalty” starting on Friday as part of the launch of his administration’s revised tariffs on multiple countries.

Trump told reporters on Wednesday the two countries were still in the middle of negotiations on trade despite the tariffs slated to begin in a few days.

“We’re talking to India now,” the president said. “We’ll see what happens.”

The Indian government said Wednesday it’s studying the implications of Trump’s tariffs announcement.

India and the U.S. have been engaged in negotiations on concluding a “fair, balanced and mutually beneficial” bilateral trade agreement over the last few months, and New Delhi remains committed to that objective, India’s Trade Ministry said in a statement.

Trump on Wednesday signed separate orders to tax imports of copper at 50% and justify his 50% tariffs on Brazil due to their criminal prosecution of former President Jair and treatment of U.S. social media companies. Trump also signed an order saying that government now had the systems in place to close the tariff loophole on “de minimis” shipments, which had enabled goods priced under $800 to enter America duty-free, largely from China.

Trump also said on Truth Social that he was meeting Wednesday with a trade delegation from South Korea, which currently faces 25% tariffs starting on Friday. He also said the U.S. has reached a deal with Pakistan that includes the development of its oil reserves. Meanwhile, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent was briefing him on trade talks with China.

Trump’s view on tariffs

Trump’s announcement comes after a slew of negotiated trade frameworks with the European Union, Japan, the Philippines and Indonesia — all of which he said would open markets for American goods while enabling the U.S. to raise tax rates on imports. The president views tariff revenues as a way to help offset the budget deficit increases tied to his recent income tax cuts and generate more domestic factory jobs.

While Trump has effectively wielded tariffs as a cudgel to reset the terms of trade, the economic impact is uncertain as most economists expect a slowdown in U.S. growth and greater inflationary pressures as some of the costs of the taxes are passed along to domestic businesses and consumers.

There’s also the possibility of more tariffs coming on trade partners with Russia as well as on pharmaceutical drugs and computer chips.

Kevin Hassett, director of the White House National Economic Council, said Trump and U.S. Trade Representative Jamieson Greer would announce the Russia-related tariff rates on India at a later date.

Tariffs face European pushback

Trump’s approach of putting a 15% tariff on America’s long-standing allies in the EU is also generating pushback, possibly causing European partners as well as Canada to seek alternatives to U.S. leadership on the world stage.

French President Emmanuel Macron said Wednesday in the aftermath of the trade framework that Europe “does not see itself sufficiently” as a global power, saying in a cabinet meeting that negotiations with the U.S. will continue as the agreement gets formalized.

“To be free, you have to be feared,” Macron said. “We have not been feared enough. There is a greater urgency than ever to accelerate the European agenda for sovereignty and competitiveness.”

Seeking a deeper partnership with India

Washington has long sought to develop a deeper partnership with New Delhi, which is seen as a bulwark against China.

Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi has established a good working relationship with Trump, and the two leaders are likely to further boost cooperation between their countries. When Trump in February met with Modi, the U.S. president said that India would start buying American oil and natural gas.

The new tariffs on India could complicate its goal of doubling bilateral trade with the U.S. to $500 billion by 2030. The two countries have had five rounds of negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement. While U.S. has been seeking greater market access and zero tariff on almost all its exports, India has expressed reservations on throwing open sectors such as agriculture and dairy, which employ a bulk of the country’s population for livelihood, Indian officials said.

The Census Bureau reported that the U.S. ran a $45.8 billion trade imbalance in goods with India last year, meaning it imported more than it exported.

At a population exceeding 1.4 billion people, India is the world’s largest country and a possible geopolitical counterbalance to China. India and Russia have close relations, and New Delhi has not supported Western sanctions on Moscow over its war in Ukraine.

The new tariffs could put India at a disadvantage in the U.S. market relative to Vietnam, Bangladesh and, possibly, China, said Ajay Sahai, director general of the Federation of Indian Export Organisations.

“We are back to square one as Trump hasn’t spelled out what the penalties would be in addition to the tariff,” Sahai said. “The demand for Indian goods is bound to be hit.”

Trump imposes 50% tariffs on Brazil over Bolsonaro case

 

SUMMARY: 

  • Trump signs to impose 50% on  
  • Cites prosecution as economic emergency under 1977  
  • Legal rationale shifts from trade imbalance to political instability 
  • U.S. had a $6.8B trade surplus with Brazil last year 

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — President signed an executive order Wednesday to impose his threatened 50% tariffs on Brazil, setting a legal rationale that Brazil’s policies and criminal prosecution of former President Jair Bolsonaro constitute an economic emergency under a 1977 law.

Trump had threatened the tariffs July 9 in a letter to President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. But the legal basis of that threat was an earlier executive order premised on trade imbalances being a threat to the . But America ran a $6.8 billion trade surplus last year with Brazil, according to the U.S. Census Bureau.

A statement by the White House said Brazil’s judiciary had tried to coerce social media companies and block their users, though it did not name the companies involved, X and Rumble.

Trump appears to identify with Bolsonaro, who attempted to overturn the results of his 2022 loss to Lula. Similarly, Trump was indicted in 2023 for his efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 U.S. presidential election.

The order would apply an additional 40% tariff on the baseline 10% tariff already being levied by Trump. But not all goods imported from Brazil would face the 40% tariff: Civil aircraft and parts, aluminum, tin, wood pulp, energy products and fertilizers are among the products being excluded.

The order said the tariffs would go into effect seven days after its signing on Wednesday.

Also Wednesday, Trump’s Treasury Department announced sanctions on Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes over alleged suppression of freedom of expression and Bolsonaro’s ongoing trial.

De Moraes oversees the criminal case against Bolsonaro, who is accused of masterminding a plot to stay in power despite his 2022 defeat.

On July 18, the State Department announced visa restrictions on Brazilian judicial officials, including de Moraes.

Federal Reserve leaves interest rates unchanged even as Trump demands cuts

 

SUMMARY: 

  • Fed leaves short-term interest rate unchanged at 4.3% 
  • Decision marks fifth hold this year amid economic uncertainty 
  • Trump urged rate cuts; Fed cites impact of trade  
  • Two Fed governors dissented, pushing for a rate reduction 

 

WASHINGTON (AP) — The left its key short-term interest rate unchanged for the fifth time this year, brushing off repeated calls from President for a cut.

The Fed’s decision Wednesday leaves its key short-term rate at about 4.3%, where it has stood after the central bank made three cuts last year. During a news conference, Chair said that Trump’s sweeping tariffs are starting to push up inflation and it will take time for the Fed to determine whether the uptick in prices will be a one-time effect or something more persistent.

“That is a risk to be assessed and managed,” he told reporters.

There were some signs of splits in the Fed’s ranks: Governors Christopher Waller and Michelle Bowman voted to reduce borrowing costs, while nine officials, including Powell, favored standing pat. It is the first time in more than three decades that two of the seven Washington-based governors have dissented. One official, Governor Adriana Kugler, was absent and didn’t vote.

The choice to hold off on a rate cut will almost certainly result in further conflict between the Fed and White House, as Trump has repeatedly demanded that the central bank reduce borrowing costs as part of his effort to assert control over one of the few remaining independent federal agencies.

Powell said that while tariffs are starting to push up the cost of goods — and he expects more of that to happen in the coming months — the price of services — rents, insurance, and hotel rooms — has continued to cool.

He suggested it could take some time to determine whether the impact of the tariffs will be short-lived or more persistent.

“We think we have a long way to go to really understand exactly how” the tariffs and prices will play out, Powell said.

Many economists and Wall Street investors have expected the Fed to cut its rate at its next meeting in September, but Powell’s remarks suggest there may not be enough data before September to support a cut.

“We have made no decisions about September,” Powell said. The chair acknowledged that if the Fed cut its rate too soon, inflation could move higher, and if it cut too late, then the job market could suffer.

Major U.S. indexes, which had been trading slightly higher Wednesday, went negative after Powell’s comments.

“The markets seem to think that Powell pushed back on a September rate cut,” said Lauren Goodwin, chief market strategist at New York Life Investments.

Powell also underscored that the vast majority of the committee agreed with a basic framework: Infation is still above the Fed’s target of 2%, while the job market is still mostly healthy, so the Fed should keep rates elevated. On Thursday, the government will release the latest reading of the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge, and it is expected to show that core prices, excluding energy and food, rose 2.7% from a year earlier.

Gus Faucher, chief economist at PNC Financial, says he expects the tariffs will only temporarily raise inflation, but that it will take most of the rest of this year for that to become apparent. He doesn’t expect the Fed to cut till December.

Trump argues that because the is doing well, rates should be lowered. But unlike a blue-chip company that usually pays lower rates than a troubled startup, the Fed adjusts rates to either slow or speed growth, and would be more likely to keep them high if the economy is strong to prevent an inflationary outbreak.

Earlier Wednesday, the government said the economy expanded at a healthy 3% annual rate in the second quarter, though that figure followed a negative reading for the first three months of the year, when the economy shrank 0.5% at an annual rate. Most economists averaged the two figures to get a growth rate of about 1.2% for the first half of this year.

Some of the disagreement likely reflects jockeying to replace Powell, whose term ends in May 2026. Waller in particular has been mentioned as a potential future Fed chair.

Bowman, meanwhile, last dissented in September 2024, when the Fed cut its key rate by a half-point. She said she preferred a quarter point cut instead, and cited the fact that inflation was still above 2.5% as a reason for caution.

Waller also said earlier this month that he favored cutting rates, but for very different reasons than Trump has cited: Waller thinks that growth and hiring are slowing, and that the Fed should reduce borrowing costs to forestall a weaker economy and a rise in unemployment.

There are other camps on the Fed’s 19-member rate-setting committee (only 12 of the 19 actually vote on rate decisions). In June, seven members signaled that they supported leaving rates unchanged through the end of this year, while two suggested they preferred a single rate cut this year. The other half supported more reductions, with eight officials backing two cuts, and two — widely thought to be Waller and Bowman — supporting three reductions.

The dissents could be a preview of what might happen after Powell steps down, if President Donald Trump appoints a replacement who pushes for the much lower the White House desires. Other Fed officials could push back if a future chair sought to cut rates by more than economic conditions would otherwise support.

Overall, the committee’s quarterly forecasts in June suggested the Fed would cut twice this year. There are only three more Fed policy meetings — in September, October, and December.

When the Fed cuts its rate, it often — but not always — results in lower borrowing costs for mortgages, auto loans and credit cards.

Some economists agree with Waller’s concerns about the job market. Excluding government hiring, the economy added just 74,000 jobs in June, with most of those gains occurring in health care.

“We are in a much slower job hiring backdrop than most people appreciate,” said Tom Porcelli, chief U.S. economist at PGIM Fixed Income.

Michael Feroli, an economist at JPMorgan Chase, said in a note to clients this week if the pair were to dissent, “it would say more about auditioning for the Fed chair appointment than about economic conditions.”

CoStar sues Zillow for alleged copyright infringement

SUMMARY:

  • Arlington-based has sued for allegedly using CoStar’s copyrighted photos on its site
  • Nearly 47,000 infringed photos appear on Zillow.com and partner sites, complaint says
  • CoStar CEO Andy Florance calls for removal of images on Zillow partner sites and as well

-based CoStar Group and one of its subsidiaries have sued Zillow, claiming that the website is using nearly 47,000 CoStar-copyrighted images illegally.

The was filed Wednesday by CoStar Group and subsidiary CoStar Realty Information in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. It claims that Zillow Group and subsidiary Zillow Inc. have published CoStar’s real estate photos on Zillow.com and other Zillow sites, as well as distributing CoStar’s copyrighted photos to Zillow’s partnership network of listing sites, including Realtor.com and Redfin.

The outcome, the lawsuit says, is that the images are displayed more than 250,000 times online illegally.

“Zillow’s willful, mass infringement warrants the imposition of permanent injunctive relief as well as a substantial award of damages,” says the complaint, which requests that the court require the “purging and destruction of all CoStar copyrighted photographs” from Zillow’s databases and systems by a third-party source that will monitor Zillow’s future compliance. CoStar also requests an award of its costs, including attorneys’ fees, and exemplary and punitive damages.

Andy Florance, CoStar’s CEO and founder, issued a statement in a news release Wednesday: “Zillow’s theft of tens of thousands of CoStar Group’s copyrighted photographs is nothing short of outrageous. Zillow is profiting from decades of CoStar Group work and the billions of dollars we have invested. Even worse, Zillow is magnifying its infringement on Redfin and Realtor.com. If these other sites do not immediately remove our images, we will have no choice but to sue them as well. We are committed to stopping this systematic infringement and holding the wrongdoers to account.”

The lawsuit provides screenshot images of photos on Zillow’s website that it alleges are CoStar’s images, as well as examples on Redfin and Realtor.com. According to the complaint, “about half of the infringing photographs located on Zillow include CoStar’s watermark. In many instances, Zillow’s listing pages obscure the watermark until a user clicks on and enlarges the actual photograph.”

What’s more, the lawsuit alleges, “Despite having the technical capability to screen out CoStar-watermarked photographs, however, [Zillow] has failed to do so.” The complaint says that Zillow announced in May 2024 it would “dramatically expand its presence in the rental listing market,” and by May 2025, the number of multifamily had risen 50% to 60,000. Zillow also reportedly had 1.9 million active rental listings at the end of 2024, which had risen to 2.2 million in May, the lawsuit says.

CoStar alleges in the suit that Zillow was able to grow its rental listings by “infringing CoStar’s copyrighted images on a staggering scale,” which allegedly allows Zillow to “enhance its products, gain customers and earn revenue.”

Zillow did not immediately respond to a request for comment on the lawsuit Wednesday.

Leidos secures $128M FBI contract

Reston-based has been awarded a $128 million task order to modernize the FNI’s Next Generation Identification (NGI) system, the bureau’s biometric and criminal history repository, the company announced Tuesday.

The NGI repository of biometric and criminal history information enhances the investigative capabilities of the and other enforcement and intelligence agencies. Leidos stated that it has collaborated with the FBI to improve the system’s accuracy to over 99.6% for fingerprint identification.

Under the task order, Leidos will provide more capabilities, including mobile apps, biometric algorithms, automated testing and the integration of other emerging technologies.

“Leidos has long partnered with the FBI to deliver mission-critical biometric systems, including NGI — the largest, most efficient electronic repository of biometric and criminal history data,” Leidos National Security Sector President Roy Stevens said in a statement. “Leidos’ work with the FBI to improve the system’s accuracy facilitates many more criminal identifications, helping to keep America safe.”

The task order covers a one-year base period of performance, with four one-year options.

In May, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security terminated a $2.4 billion IT and cybersecurity contract awarded in 2024 to Leidos, the Agile Cybersecurity Technical Security (ACTS) contract. That same month, Leidos announced it had acquired Kudu Dynamics, a Chantilly-based tech company that builds AI-powered cybersecurity tools for defense customers, for $300 million.

With 47,000 employees worldwide, Leidos reported $16.7 billion in revenue for the fiscal year that ended Jan. 3.

Mars to pump $2B into U.S. manufacturing

SUMMARY:

  • plans to invest $2 billion in U.S. by end of 2026
  • Candymaker has already committed $6 billion to U.S. manufacturing since 2020
  • Mars also launched $250 million innovation fund

-based candymaker and pet care giant Mars announced on Tuesday that it plans to infuse $2 billion into its U.S. manufacturing operations by the end of 2026.

The maker of Snickers, M&M’s, and Twix says the investment will support a new, $240 million facility for Nature’s Bakery in Salt Lake City, slated to open on Wednesday. The 339,000-plus-square-foot site will create over 230 jobs and expand the brand’s capacity.

“This investment is about building a stronger, more resilient business in the U.S. — one that can grow with our consumers, deliver for our partners and create lasting economic impact in the communities where we operate,” Mars Chief Financial Officer Claus Aagaard said in a statement.

Mars says 94% of its products sold in the U.S. are produced in the country.

“The U.S. is our biggest and most important market, and a key engine of growth for the long term — not only through our legacy manufacturing footprint but also through the expansion of strategic acquisitions like Nature’s Bakery, which is already scaling quickly,” Aagaard said. “That’s why we’ve committed $6 billion to U.S. manufacturing in the last five years, with another $2 billion planned by the end of next year.”

The $2 billion investment isn’t the only major new initiative to come from Mars. Earlier this month, the company announced the launch of a $250 million investment fund dedicated to fostering business innovation and growth. The innovation fund aims to provide capital to companies developing solutions to address sustainability challenges in the food industry.

Mars says it plans to deploy the fund as direct investments. It will focus on supporting technologies that reduce the emissions associated with agricultural inputs in its products, developing lower emission alternatives to current ingredients and creating a new type of packaging designed for circularity, with a focus on recyclable, compostable or otherwise bio-benign replacements for flexible plastics.

The fund was announced on July 1, the day Mars released its most recent sustainability report. In that report, Mars said that by the end of 2024, it had achieved another 1.9% reduction in absolute greenhouse gas emissions compared with its 2015 baseline while growing the business by over 69% to approximately $55 billion in annual sales during the same period.

Last month, the European Union’s watchdog organization announced that it has opened an investigation into Mars’ proposed $35.9 billion acquisition of , the producer of Cheez-It, Pop-Tarts, Pringles and Eggo. Although the deal could still go through, it will be delayed at least through Oct. 31, possibly until the end of the year. However, the U.S. Federal Trade Commission cleared the deal following an antitrust review.

Mars is Virginia’s largest privately held company and the fourth largest in the United States. In recent years, it has made acquisitions in the pet care and candy sectors in an effort to double its sales by 2033. The company employs more than 70,000 people globally.