Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Google hit with $3.5 billion fine from European Union in ad-tech antitrust case

Summary

  • EU regulators fine $3.5B for antitrust violations
  • Penalty tied to favoritism in services
  • Fourth major antitrust penalty for Google from Brussels
  • Commission orders Google to end self-preferencing practices
  • Google to appeal, slams EU over tech regulations

European Union regulators on Friday hit Google with a 2.95 billion euro ($3.5 billion) fine for breaching the bloc’s competition rules by favoring its own digital advertising services, but the bloc’s latest move to crack down on Big Tech companies drew outrage from President Donald Trump.

The , the 27-nation bloc’s executive branch and top antitrust enforcer, also ordered the U.S. tech giant to end its “self-preferencing practices” and stop “conflicts of interest” along the advertising technology supply chain.

It’s the fourth time Brussels has sanctioned Google with a multibillion-euro fine in an antitrust case, in a wider battle with regulators that dates back to 2017.

Trump, whose administration has lashed out at the bloc over digital regulations and taxes imposed on U.S. tech companies, said the EU fine was “effectively taking money that would otherwise go to American Investments and Jobs.”

“Very unfair, and the American Taxpayer will not stand for it!” he said in a post on Truth Social. “As I have said before, my Administration will NOT allow these discriminatory actions to stand.”

The Commission said its investigation found that Google “abused its power” by favoring its own online display advertising technology services to the detriment of competitors, online advertisers and publishers.

The investigation focused on Google’s AdX exchange and DFP ad platform, tools that bring together advertisers, who want to market their products, with online publishers, who want to sell commercial space on their websites.

The company has 60 days to come up with proposed remedies.

If it doesn’t come up with “a viable plan, the Commission will not hesitate to impose an appropriate remedy,” Teresa Ribera, the European Commission’s executive vice-president overseeing competition affairs, said in a statement posted online.

“At this stage, it appears that the only way for Google to end its conflict of interest effectively is with a structural remedy, such as selling some part of its Adtech business,” Ribera said.

But the Commission said it first wants to “hear and assess” the company’s proposal.

Google said the decision was “wrong” and vowed to appeal.

“It imposes an unjustified fine and requires changes that will hurt thousands of European businesses by making it harder for them to make money,” Lee-Anne Mulholland, the company’s global head of regulatory affairs, said in a statement.

Ribera said that Google’s “illegal practices” resulted in advertisers facing higher marketing costs that they likely passed on to European consumers through higher prices for products and services. At the same time, it also meant lower revenue for publishers, like news sites, which might have resulted in lower quality and higher subscription costs for consumers.

The decision was overdue, coming more than two years after the European Commission announced antitrust charges against Google. It also comes amid renewed tensions between Brussels and Washington over trade, tariffs and technology regulation.

The commission had said in 2023 that the only way to satisfy antitrust concerns about Google’s lucrative digital ad business was to sell off parts of its business.

Top EU officials have previously said that they were seeking a forced sale because past cases that ended with fines and requirements for Google to stop anti-competitive practices have not worked, allowing the company to continue its behavior in a different form.

The commission’s penalty follows a formal investigation into online display advertising that it opened in June 2021, which found that since 2014, Google “abused” its dominant position in the ad-technology ecosystem.

Online display ads are banners and text that appear on websites and are personalized based on an internet user’s browsing history.

Mulholland said, “There’s nothing anticompetitive in providing services for ad buyers and sellers, and there are more alternatives to our services than ever before.”

Cori Crider, a senior fellow at the Future of Technology Institute think tank, said, “Europe made an important stand for the rule of today by pressing ahead with this first-step fine in the face of Trump and Big Tech’s bullying.”

But “only a break-up will fix Google’s monopoly,” said Crider, who’s also an honorary professor at UCL Laws. “If Europe’s enforcers flinch on a break-up in the end, Google will rightly chalk a fine up as a win.”

While the EU’s fine is a huge sum, it’s pocket change for Google, which earned $28.2 billion in revenue in the second quarter.

Google is also facing pressure on the other side of the Atlantic over its ad-tech business.

In a separate U.S. case, the Justice Department asked a federal judge in May to force the company to sell off its AdX and DFP services. The case is scheduled to move to the penalty phase, known as remedy hearings, later this month.

The Commission said its finding that Google abused its dominance will be important for the remedy hearings because it’s the same conduct that the Justice Department was investigating.

Authorities in Canada and Britain have also targeted Google over its conduct in the digital ad industry.

Google has already avoided a breakup earlier this week in the U.S., where it’s under fire on a separate front after a U.S. federal judge found it had an illegal monopoly in online search. On Tuesday, the judge ordered a shake-up of its search engine but rebuffed the government’s attempt to force a sale of its Chrome browser.

Stocks wobble as Wall Street questions whether the US job market has slowed by enough or too much

Summary

  • falls 0.5% after hitting record high Thursday
  • Dow drops 245 points, slips 0.2%
  • Weak raises concerns about slowdown risk
  • Treasury yields tumble on softer signals
  • Investors weigh Fed rate cuts vs. downturn fears

NEW YORK (AP) — is drifting higher on Thursday as the countdown ticks to an update on the U.S. job market coming Friday, one that could clear the way for the cuts to interest rates that investors love.

The S&P 500 rose 0.4% as it clawed back more of its losses since setting an all-time high last week. The Industrial Average was up 180 points, or 0.4%, as of 11:30 a.m. Eastern time, and the Nasdaq composite was 0.4% higher.

Stocks got some lift from easing pressure from the bond market, where Treasury yields fell following the latest reports on the U.S. job market to come in worse than economists expected. One report suggested employers, not including the government, nearly halved their hiring last month. Another said that more workers applied for benefits last week in an indication of rising layoffs.

Neither number is flashing a recession, and a third report on activity for businesses in the information and other services industries showed a stronger-than-expected acceleration of growth.

The upside for investors of a slowdown in the job market is that it could push the to consider cutting its main interest rate for the first time this year at its next meeting in a couple weeks. Such cuts can give the economy and job market a kickstart, though they can also push inflation higher.

So far this year, the Fed has been keeping its main interest rate on hold because it’s been more worried about inflation potentially worsening because of President Donald Trump’s tariffs than about the job market.

“The year started with strong job growth, but that momentum has been whipsawed by uncertainty,” according to Nela Richardson, chief economist at ADP. She said several things could be behind the slowdown, including ”labor shortages, skittish consumers, and disruptions.”

A more comprehensive report on the job market’s health during August will arrive on Friday from the U.S. , and it will likely carry much weight with the Fed. Ahead of it, the yield on the 10-year Treasury fell to 4.19% from 4.22% late Wednesday.

Last month’s grim jobs report, which included massive downward revisions for June and May, sent financial markets spiraling and prompted Trump to fire the head of the agency that compiles the monthly data.

On Wall Street, American Eagle Outfitters jumped 32.3% after the teen fashion retailer reported more than double the profit that analysts had expected for its latest quarter. It benefited from a frenzy of media attention in late July over a provocative advertising campaign featuring actor Sydney Sweeney.

The ads — which featured the tagline “Sydney Sweeney has great jeans” — sparked a debate about race, Western beauty standards, and the backlash to “woke” American politics and culture.

Hewlett Packard Enterprise added 5.2% following its own better-than-expected profit report.

T. Rowe Price climbed 6% after announcing a deal where Goldman Sachs plans to buy up to $3.5 billion of its stock, or up to 3.5% of all its shares. They’re teaming up to offer access to some of the private markets where Goldman Sachs is an expert to the retirement savers and other investors that T. Rowe Price serves. Goldman Sachs added 1.3%.

On the losing side of Wall Street was Salesforce, which was one of the heaviest weights on the market despite reporting a better profit than analysts expected. Analysts called the performance solid but suggested some of it may have come from one-time factors. Salesforce, which helps businesses manage their customers, slumped 5.8%.

C3.ai fell 3.2% after reporting a larger loss for the latest quarter than analysts expected. Chairman Thomas Siebel called the results “completely unacceptable,” while announcing a new chief executive for the company, Stephen Ehikian. He was most recently acting administrator of the U.S. General Services Administration.

Figma tumbled 17.9% even though the company, which offers a design and product development platform, reported results for the latest quarter that roughly matched analysts’ expectations. Its forecasts for upcoming revenue also came close to analysts’, but expectations may have been even higher given that its stock came into the day at more than double its $33 IPO price from July.

In stock markets abroad, indexes were mixed across Europe and Asia.

Indexes dropped 1.3% in Shanghai and 1.1% in Hong Kong but jumped 1.5% in Tokyo.

475 detained in record immigration raid at Hyundai site

Summary

  • 475 detained in
  • Raid targeted electric vehicle plant site
  • Largest single-site enforcement in HSI’s 20-year history
  • Probe focused on alleged illegal hiring practices
  • South Korea says many of its citizens were detained

SAVANNAH, Ga. (AP) — Immigration authorities said Friday they detained 475 people, most of them South Korean nationals, when hundreds of federal agents raided the sprawling manufacturing site in Georgia where Korean automaker Hyundai makes .

Steven Schrank, the lead Georgia agent of Investigations, said during a news conference Friday that the raid resulted from a monthslong investigation into allegations of illegal hiring at the site and was the “largest single site enforcement operation” in the agency’s two-decade history.

The Thursday raid targeted one of Georgia’s largest and most high-profile manufacturing sites, where Hyundai Motor Group a year ago began manufacturing electric vehicles at a $7.6 billion plant west of Savannah that employs about 1,200 people. Gov. Brian Kemp and other officials have touted it as the state’s largest-ever largest economic development project.

Agents focused their operation on an adjacent plant that’s still under construction at which Hyundai has partnered with LG Energy Solution to produce batteries batteries that power EVs.

South Korean government expresses ‘concern’

The South Korean government expressed “concern and regret” over the operation targeting its citizens.

“The business activities of our investors and the rights of our nationals must not be unjustly infringed in the process of U.S. enforcement,” South Korean Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lee Jaewoong said in a televised statement from Seoul.

Lee said the ministry is dispatching diplomats from its embassy in Washington and consulate in Atlanta to the site, and planning to form an on-site response team.

Immigration attorney Charles Kuck said two of his clients who were detained had arrived from South Korea under a visa waiver program that enables them to travel for tourism or business for stays of 90 days or less without obtaining a visa.

“They were both engaging in normal visa waiver activities, still lawfully here doing the activities that are lawful for a visa waiver to do,” Kuck said.

One of his clients, he said, has been in the U.S. for a couple of weeks, while the other has been in the country for about 45 days. He did not provide details about the kind of work they were doing but said they had been planning to go home soon.

Schrank told reporters in Savannah that while some of the detained workers illegally crossed the U.S. border, others had entered the country legally but had expired visas or had entered on a visa waiver that prohibited them from working. He said some of those detained worked for the battery manufacturer, while others were employed by contractors and subcontractors at the construction site.

Schrank said he didn’t know precisely how many of the 475 detained were Korean nationals, but that they made up a majority. No one has yet been charged with any crimes, he said, but the investigation is ongoing.

“This was not a immigration operation where agents went into the premises, rounded up folks, and put them on buses,” Schrank said. “This has been a multi-month criminal investigation where we have developed evidence and conducted interviews, gathered documents and presented that evidence to the court in order to obtain a judicial search warrant.”

He said most of the detainees were taken to an immigration detention center in Folkston, Georgia, near the Florida state line.

administration has undertaken sweeping ICE operations

President Donald Trump’s administration has undertaken sweeping ICE operations as part of a mass deportation agenda. Immigration officers have raided farms, construction sites, restaurants and auto repair shops.

The Pew Research Center, citing preliminary Census Bureau data, says the U.S. labor force lost more than 1.2 million immigrants from January through July. That includes people who are in the country illegally as well as residents.

The Democratic Party of Georgia on Friday condemned the raid, with its chair, Charlie Bailey, calling the raids, “politically-motivated fear tactics designed to terrorize people who work hard for a living, power our economy and contribute to the communities across Georgia that they have made their homes.”

The Hyundai site sits on 3,000 acres (1,214 hectares) in a largely rural area of Bryan County, drawing in workers from several surrounding counties and communities including the city of Savannah, located about 25 miles (40 kilometers) away.

Hyundai began producing electric vehicles at the site last September. A few months later, Hyundai Motor Group Executive Chairman Euisun Chung during a appearance with Trump credited the president with the company’s decision to create more American jobs by building an EV factory in Georgia.

“Our decision to invest in Savannah, Georgia, creating more than 8,500 American jobs, was initiated during my meeting with President Trump in Seoul in 2019,” Chung said at the March event.

Battery plant slated to open next year

The battery plant operated by HL-GA Battery Co., a joint venture by Hyundai and LG Energy Solution, is slated to open next year.

In a statement to The Associated Press, LG said it was “closely monitoring the situation and gathering all relevant details.” It said it couldn’t immediately confirm how many of its employees or Hyundai workers had been detained.

“Our top priority is always ensuring the safety and well-being of our employees and partners. We will fully cooperate with the relevant authorities,” the company said.

Operations at Hyundai’s EV manufacturing plant weren’t interrupted by the raid, said plant spokesperson Bianca Johnson. Hyundai Motor Company said in a statement Friday it was “working to understand the specific circumstances” of the raid and detentions.

“As of today, it is our understanding that none of those detained is directly employed by Hyundai Motor Company,” the company’s statement said. “We prioritize the safety and well-being of everyone working at the site and comply with all laws and regulations wherever we operate.”

HL-GA Battery Co. did not immediately respond to a request for comment Friday. In a statement Thursday, the company said it’s “cooperating fully with the appropriate authorities.”

Koreans are rarely caught up in immigration enforcement compared to other nationalities. Only 46 Koreans were deported during the 12-month period ended Sept. 30 out of more than 270,000 removals for all nationalities, according to ICE.

Those arrested Thursday who fight deportation may be detained as their cases wind through immigration court. The number of people in ICE custody topped 60,000 in August, an all-time high.

Amazon to build $16M+ distribution center in Amherst

Amazon.com Services has selected for the site of a $16 million-plus, 78,000-square-foot distribution center, which county officials say will bring dozens of local jobs to the region.

The county’s economic development authority announced this week that has purchased the largest lot in the Amelon Commerce Center — a 120-acre industrial park mostly owned by the . The EDA sold the 26-acre site to Amazon in late August.

“We are excited to welcome this internationally recognized company to the Amelon Commerce Center,” said Victoria Hanson, executive director of the EDA, in a statement. “Amazon’s decision to invest in Amherst County and the region highlights the strength of our economy and the advantages of our transportation network.”

The EDA graded the site in 2023 using local funds in combination with a grant from the state’s GO Virginia economic development program. In addition to creating jobs, the EDA says the site will support efforts to “provide fast delivery and great service to the region.”

Amazon declined to provide project specifics or an estimated timeline, with a spokesperson saying more details will be shared at a later time.

Since 2010, Amazon has invested more than $135 billion in Virginia, including infrastructure and compensation to employees, and has created more than 42,000 full and part-time jobs.

In other news regarding the Amelon Commerce Center, Hanson says the EDA is still looking for tenants or purchasers for a 45,000-square-foot spec shell building the county finished building in December 2024. The building, which is still vacant, could be occupied by up to four tenants and rests on an 11.5-acre site within the industrial park.

Hiring stalls with US companies reluctant to expand in an uncertain economic landscape

Summary

  • U.S. economy added just 22,000 jobs last month
  • Hiring slowed from 79,000 jobs added in July
  • rate rose to 4.3%, Labor Dept. reports
  • Signs cooling amid economic uncertainty
  • policies weigh on hiring outlook

WASHINGTON (AP) — U.S. employers added just 22,000 jobs last month as the labor market continued to cool amid uncertainty over President Donald ‘s economic policies.

Hiring decelerated from 79,000 in July, the said Friday, and came in below the roughly 80,000 economists had expected for August. The unemployment rate ticked up to 4.3%, also worse than expected and the highest level since 2021.

When the Labor Department put out a disappointing a month ago, an enraged President Donald Trump responded by firing the economist in charge of compiling the numbers and nominating a loyalist to replace her.

Talking to reporters Thursday night at a dinner with wealthy tech executives, Trump had seemed to shrug off whatever hiring numbers would come out Friday. “The real numbers that I’m talking about are going to be whatever it is, but will be in a year from now,” the president said.

Factories shed 12,000 jobs in August, the fourth straight month that manufacturers have cut payrolls. Construction companies cut 7,000 jobs, and the federal government 15,000.

and social assistance companies – a category that spans hospital to daycare centers – added nearly 47,000 jobs last month and now account for 87% of the private-sector jobs created in 2025.

Labor Department revisions lopped 21,000 jobs off June and July payrolls and revealed that employers had actually cut 13,000 jobs in June, the first monthly job losses since December 2020 when the job market was disrupted by the COVID-19 pandemic.

So far this year the economy is generating fewer than 75,000 new jobs a month, less than half the 168,000 jobs per month added last year and not even a quarter of the 400,000 jobs added monthly in the hiring boom of 2021-2023.

The U.S. job market has lost momentum this year, partly because of the lingering effects of 11 interest rate hikes by the Fed’s inflation fighters in 2022 and 2023 and partly because Trump’s policies, including his sweeping tariffs on imports from almost every country on earth, have created uncertainty that leaves managers reluctant to make hiring decisions.

“The warning bell that rang in the labor market a month ago just got louder,’ Olu Sonola, head of U.S economic research at Fitch Rates, wrote in a commentary. “It’s hard to argue that tariff uncertainty isn’t a key driver of this weakness.”

Democrats were quick to pounce on the report as evidence that Trump’s policies were damaging the economy and hurting Americans.

“Americans cannot afford any more of Trump’s disastrous economy. Hiring is frozen, jobless claims are rising, and the unemployment rate is now higher than it has been in years,” said Rep. Richard Neal of Massachusetts, the ranking Democrat on the House Ways and Means Committee. “The president is squeezing every wallet as he chases an illegal tariff agenda that is hiking costs, spooking investment, and stunting domestic manufacturing.”

Workers’ average hourly earnings rose 0.3% from July and 3.7% from August 2024, exactly what forecasters expected. The year-over-year figure is nearing the 3.5% that many economists see as consistent with the ‘s 2% inflation target.

The weak numbers make it all but certain that Federal Reserve will cut its benchmark interest rate at its next meeting, Sept. 16-17. Under chair Jerome Powell, the Fed has been reluctant to cut rates until it sees what impact Trump’s import taxes have on inflation.

Trump has repeatedly pressured Powell to lower rates, and has sought to fire one Fed governor, , over allegations of in what Cook claims is a pretext to gain control over the central bank.

The Labor Department reported Thursday that the number of Americans applying for unemployment benefits — a proxy for layoffs — rose last week to the highest level since June, though the number of claims remained within a healthy range.

The outplacement firm Challenger, Gray & Christmas said Wednesday that U.S.-based employers have announced more than 892,000 jobs cuts this year through August, more than the 761,000 reported for all 12 months of 2024.

After seeing the weak July jobs numbers, Trump fired Erika McEntarfer, head of the Bureau of Labor Statistics, baselessly claiming the hiring report had been rigged to hurt him politically.

He has nominated a partisan idealogue, E.J. Antoni, to replace her. But for now, pending Antoni’s confirmation by the Senate, the jobs report is in the hands of the acting BLS commissioner, William Wiatrowski, a career Labor Department official.

Economists and others familiar with how the jobs numbers are collected have expressed confidence that Labor Department procedures will keep the data are safe from political interference.

The revisions are standard practice, and necessary because many companies surveyed by the government submit their responses late or correct what they’ve already sent in.

Government economists are also contending with a big drop in the share of companies that respond to the surveys. A decade ago, about 60% of companies surveyed responded. Now only about 40% do.

And it’s an international problem for data collectors, especially since COVID-19. The United Kingdom even suspended publication of an official unemployment rate because of inadequate responses.

“I remember being at an international conference where the chief statistician of the Russian Republic was complaining about how the Russians don’t want to complete their surveys,” William Beach, BLS commissioner from 2019 to 2023, said in an interview last month. “What could he do? If you can’t compel completion in Russia, you can’t compel it anywhere.”

Elon Musk in line for $1 trillion pay package if Tesla hits aggressive goals over next 10 years

Summary

  • proposes nearly $1 trillion pay package for
  • Plan spans 10 years with 12 share tranches tied to milestones
  • Targets include $2 trillion market cap and 20M vehicle output
  • Musk’s compensation linked to production and delivery goals
  • Tesla also expanding into and innovation

Tesla CEO Elon Musk could be in line for a payout of $1 trillion if his electric car company meets a series of extremely aggressive targets over the next 10 years, according to documents released by the company.

Tesla, which is leaning heavily into robotics and AI, said in a regulatory filing on Friday that the package has a dozen share tranches that include awards for Musk if targets, ranging from car production to the total value of the company, are met over that time period.

Very early in the plan, Tesla would have to reach a market valuation of $2 trillion and achieve 20 million vehicles deliveries. Tesla delivered less than 2 million vehicles in 2024.

That milestone would also required a million robotaxis in commercial operation and the delivery of 1 million artificial intelligence bots.

Musk needs to remain with Tesla for at least seven and a half years to cash out on any stock, and 10 years to earn the full amount.

Musk has been one of the richest  in the world for several years.

Musk would also receive more voting power over Tesla under the proposed plan. The EV company is set to hold its annual meeting on Nov. 6. Tesla’s last shareholders meeting was on June 13 of last year, where investors voted to restore Musk’s record $44.9 billion pay package that was thrown out by a Delaware judge earlier that year.

A condition of the 11th and 12th tranches of the plan includes Musk coming up with a framework for someone to succeed him as CEO.

The goals set out for Musk and Tesla are extremely ambitious given recent tumult at the Texas company.

Tesla shares have plunged 25% this year largely due to blowback over Musk’s affiliation with President Donald . But Tesla also faces intensifying competition from the big Detroit automakers and particularly from China.

Telsa sales have fallen precipitously in Europe after Musk aligned with a far-right political party in German.

Sales plunged 40% in July in the 27 European Union countries compared with the year earlier even as sales overall of electric vehicle soared, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association. Meanwhile sales of Chinese rival BYD continued to climb fast, grabbing 1.1% market share of all car sales in the month versus Tesla’s 0.7%.

In its most recent quarter, Tesla reported that quarterly profits plunged from $1.39 billion to $409 million. Revenue also fell and the company fell short of even the lowered expectations on .

Investors have grown increasingly worried about the trajectory of the company after Musk had spent so much time in Washington this year, becoming one of the most prominent officials in the in its bid to slash the size of the U.S. government.

Last month Tesla said that it gave Musk a stock grant of $29 billion as a reward for years of “transformative and unprecedented” growth despite a recent foray into right-wing politics that has hurt its sales, profits and its stock price.

The award arrived eight months after a judge revoked Musk’s 2018 pay package for a second time, something the company noted in August. Tesla has appealed the ruling.

Tesla said at the time that the grant was a “first step, good faith” way of retaining Musk and keeping him focused, citing his of SpaceX, xAI and other companies. Musk said recently that he needed more shares and control so he couldn’t be ousted by shareholder activists.

Tesla’s stock rose nearly 2% in premarket trading.

Tesla CEO Elon Musk could be in line for a payout of $1 trillion if his electric car company meets a series of extremely aggressive targets over the next 10 years, according to documents released by the company.

Tesla, which is leaning heavily into robotics and AI, said in a regulatory filing on Friday that the package has a dozen share tranches that include awards for Musk if targets, ranging from car production to the total value of the company, are met over that time period.

Very early in the plan, Tesla would have to reach a market valuation of $2 trillion and achieve 20 million vehicles deliveries. Tesla delivered less than 2 million vehicles in 2024.

That milestone would also required a million robotaxis in commercial operation and the delivery of 1 million artificial intelligence bots.

Musk needs to remain with Tesla for at least seven and a half years to cash out on any stock, and 10 years to earn the full amount.

Musk has been one of the richest people in the world for several years.

Musk would also receive more voting power over Tesla under the proposed plan. The EV company is set to hold its annual shareholders meeting on Nov. 6. Tesla’s last shareholders meeting was on June 13 of last year, where investors voted to restore Musk’s record $44.9 billion pay package that was thrown out by a Delaware judge earlier that year.

A condition of the 11th and 12th tranches of the plan includes Musk coming up with a framework for someone to succeed him as CEO.

The goals set out for Musk and Tesla are extremely ambitious given recent tumult at the Texas company.

Tesla shares have plunged 25% this year largely due to blowback over Musk’s affiliation with President Donald Trump. But Tesla also faces intensifying competition from the big Detroit automakers and particularly from China.

Telsa sales have fallen precipitously in Europe after Musk aligned with a far-right political party in German.

Sales plunged 40% in July in the 27 European Union countries compared with the year earlier even as sales overall of electric vehicle soared, according to the European Automobile Manufacturers’ Association. Meanwhile sales of Chinese rival BYD continued to climb fast, grabbing 1.1% market share of all car sales in the month versus Tesla’s 0.7%.

In its most recent quarter, Tesla reported that quarterly profits plunged from $1.39 billion to $409 million. Revenue also fell and the company fell short of even the lowered expectations on Wall Street.

Investors have grown increasingly worried about the trajectory of the company after Musk had spent so much time in Washington this year, becoming one of the most prominent officials in the Trump administration in its bid to slash the size of the U.S. government.

Last month Tesla said that it gave Musk a stock grant of $29 billion as a reward for years of “transformative and unprecedented” growth despite a recent foray into right-wing politics that has hurt its sales, profits and its stock price.

The award arrived eight months after a judge revoked Musk’s 2018 pay package for a second time, something the company noted in August. Tesla has appealed the ruling.

Tesla said at the time that the grant was a “first step, good faith” way of retaining Musk and keeping him focused, citing his leadership of SpaceX, xAI and other companies. Musk said recently that he needed more shares and control so he couldn’t be ousted by shareholder activists.

Tesla’s stock rose nearly 2% in premarket trading.

Justice Department probes mortgage fraud claims against Lisa Cook of Federal Reserve, AP source says

Summary

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Justice Department has begun examining mortgage fraud allegations against Lisa Cook, the Federal Reserve governor who is challenging a effort to remove her from her job in a move she says is designed to erode the central bank’s independence.

Investigators have issued subpoenas as part of an inquiry into Cook that was spawned by a criminal referral from the country’s top housing regulator, according to a person familiar with the matter who was not authorized to discuss the probe and spoke on condition of anonymity to The Associated Press.

A Justice Department spokesperson declined to comment on the inquiry, which was earlier reported by The Wall Street Journal.

“Predictably and recognizing the flaws in challenging their illegal firing of Governor Cook, the administration is scrambling to invent new justifications for its overreach. This Justice Department — perhaps the most politicized in American history — will do whatever President Trump demands,” Cook’s lawyer, Abbe David Lowell, said in a statement.

News of the investigation comes amid a high-stakes fight over President Donald Trump’s announcement last month that he was ousting Cook, an action she says is being undertaken so that he can seize control over a central bank typically shielded from political pressure and tasked with making decisions about whether to raise or lower interest rates.

Trump moved to fire Cook on Aug. 25 after one of his appointees alleged that she committed mortgage fraud related to two properties she purchased in 2021, before she joined the Fed.

Bill Pulte, who made the criminal referral in his capacity as director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, has asserted that Cook, had claimed two primary residences, in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Atlanta, in 2021 to get better mortgage terms. Mortgage rates are often higher on second homes or those purchased to rent.

The Justice Department inquiry is centered on those two properties, according to the person familiar with the matter, and is being coordinated with U.S. Attorney offices by Ed Martin, the director of the Justice Department’s Weaponization Working Group, who is also pursuing mortgage fraud investigations into perceived Trump adversaries, including Sen. Adam Schiff of California and New York Attorney General Letitia James, both Democrats. Both have vigorously denied any wrongdoing.

Cook’s lawyers have also insisted that she did not engage in fraud.

“The questions over how Governor Cook described her properties from time to time, which we have started to address in the pending case and will continue to do so, are not fraud, but it takes nothing for this DOJ to undertake a new politicized investigation, and they appear to have just done it again,” Lowell said.

Separately, on Thursday, the Justice Department urged a federal judge in Washington to allow for Cook’s immediate removal while she fights to keep her job, dismissing as “baseless” Cook’s claim that the president is attempting to fire her so that he can seize control of the Federal Reserve.

Cook’s lawyers have argued that the firing was unlawful because presidents can only fire Fed governors “for cause,” which has typically meant inefficiency, neglect of duty, or malfeasance while in office. They also said she was entitled to a hearing and a chance to respond to the charges before being fired, but was not provided either. Attorneys said in the court filing that Cook never committed mortgage fraud.

The Justice Department says the president has the discretion to fire Cook for cause and that his decisions cannot be reviewed by the courts.

The case could become a turning point for the nearly 112-year-old Federal Reserve, which was designed by Congress to be insulated from day-to-day political influence. Economists prefer independent central banks because they can do unpopular things, such as lifting interest rates to combat inflation more easily than elected officials.

Trump has repeatedly attacked Fed Chair Jerome Powell and the other members of the Fed’s interest-rate setting committee for not cutting the short-term interest rate they control more quickly.

Many economists worry that if the Fed falls under the control of the , it will keep its key interest rate lower than justified by economic fundamentals to satisfy Trump’s demands for cheaper borrowing.

Trump Fed pick Stephen Miran plans to keep White House job

Summary

  • nominated by for Board
  • Told Senate he’d remain a economic adviser
  • Plans “unpaid leave of absence” while serving at the Fed
  • Says he’d resign only if confirmed for a longer Fed term
  • Democrats criticize potential conflict of interest

WASHINGTON (AP) — Stephen Miran, President Donald Trump’s pick to join the Federal Reserve Board, said Thursday that he would remain a White House employee even if the Senate confirms him to fill an unexpired term at the central bank.

Miran, who was nominated to fill a gubernatorial term set to expire in January, made the disclosure at a hearing before the Senate Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs Committee.

He said that on the advice of his lawyers he would take an “unpaid leave of absence” as chair of the White House Council of Economic Advisers. Miran later said he would only resign from the Republican administration if he were nominated for a longer term at the Fed.

His answer instantly triggered alarm bells about the Fed’s independence, suggesting that the central bank could ultimately become subservient to Trump’s whims instead of its congressional mandates to keep prices stable and maximize employment. Political control of the Fed could erode the faith that the American population and investors worldwide place in the U.S. economy, which could threaten global markets and national prosperity.

Democrats blasted Miran’s plan to keep his day job at the White House.

“Your independence has already been seriously compromised,” Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., said. “You are going to be technically an employee of the president of the United States but an independent member of the board of the Federal Reserve. That’s ridiculous.”

Miran’s hearing reflected the broader battle over Trump’s efforts to gain control of the Fed. Because of the possible negative impacts on the economy, the Fed has tried to act based on the economic data rather than electoral considerations.

Trump, however, has engaged in a prolonged campaign of pressuring and mocking Fed Chair Jerome Powell for not cutting the benchmark interest rate to Trump’s liking, a move that could end up pumping more money into the economy and creating greater inflationary risks. The Fed has yet to reach its 2% inflation target and has held its rates steady in part because of the uncertainties created by Trump’s import taxes.

The president has also sought to apply pressure on the Fed over its renovation of its headquarters and other buildings and has tried to fire as a Fed governor over allegations that she committed . Cook has said she will not resign and has sued to overturn Trump’s move, but on Thursday the Justice Department had started examining the allegations against her.

Miran, in his answers to senators, played down the controversy over Trump’s desire to control the Fed. Miran said that if he were confirmed to fill the rest of Adriana Kugler’s term, he would act based on his own judgments about inflation and employment.

“Look, the president nominated me because I have policy views, that, I suppose that he liked,” he said told the committee chairman, Sen. Tim Scott, R-S.C. “If I’m confirmed to this role, I will act independently, as the Federal Reserve always does, based on my own personal analysis of economic data.”

Even Republicans saw the risks to the loss of Fed independence. Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., asked Miran to commit to “ignore all the rhetoric from all politicians” and make his own choices.

But Miran arrives with the baggage of having worked for a president who has expressed disdain for the Fed’s tradition of independence. Trump has argued that he knows more about monetary policy as he has called for the Fed’s benchmark rate to be cut by a full 3 percentage points.

In June, a Fed forecast of future rates showed emerging divisions among the policymakers. Seven projected no rate cuts at all this year, two indicated one cut and 10 forecast at least two reductions.

“This is a crisis moment for the Federal Reserve, for the financial system and for the economic stability of families all across this country,” Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., told reporters before the start of the hearing.

Warren added that the Fed board’s “independence and their efforts to make decisions based on what’s really happening in the economy — not what the politics are — is something that benefits every single American. Donald Trump wants to burn that to the ground.”

Under questioning by Warren, Miran declined to say whether Trump lost the 2020 presidential election to Democrat Joe Biden, saying only that Congress certified Biden as president. Miran declined under questioning to contradict Trump’s unfounded claim that the Bureau of Labor Statistics had faked jobs numbers for political reasons.

Trump fired the bureau’s head after severe revisions to the July employment report showed the economy was potentially weaker than Trump’s claims of a “golden age.”

There are also questions about how Miran interprets the Fed’s independence. He said that the president is entitled to express his opinion on monetary policy and that consideration of climate change as an economic force by Fed officials would be a politicization of the central bank.

In a 2024 paper he co-wrote for the Manhattan Institute, Miran argued that the Fed was already politicized by “highly political, personnel who move freely between the White House” and the central bank’s headquarters.

In that same paper, Miran wanted to heighten presidential control, saying that having Fed board members serve at the will of the president would confer “greater democratic legitimacy” on the Fed.

By indicating that he could return to the White House, Miran seemed to undermine one of his own recommendations in his paper.

“To further insulate board members from the day-to-day political process, they should be prohibited from serving in the executive branch for four years following the end of their term,” the paper said.

Retired Coast Guard captain is new Christopher Newport biz school dean

Anna W. Hickey, a retired U.S. captain, will become of ‘s .

The -based university announced Hickey’s appointment Wednesday, saying her selection followed a national search. She succeeds Alan Witt, the former PBMares CEO who served as the business school’s dean from 2021 until his retirement in July.

Hickey retired from the Coast Guard this year after a career that dates back to 1997. She was most recently vice provost for academic administration at the U.S. Coast Guard Academy, where she also served as dean of the academy’s School of and Management.

“Dr. Hickey has a long and distinguished career of service to our country through military and leadership positions,” President William G. Kelly said in a statement. “She will be an exceptional addition to our Christopher Newport campus and an exceptional leader, teacher and scholar.”

Hickey has previously taught extensively about accounting and budgeting, with specific interests in governmental financial reporting and accounting education. She is affiliated with the Association of Government Accountants and has served as a reviewer for the Journal of Accounting Education. She has a bachelor’s degree in management from the U.S. Coast Guard Academy, an MBA in finance from Florida Atlantic University and a doctorate in accounting from West Virginia University.

“I am deeply honored to serve as the dean of the Luter School and eager to meet its outstanding students, faculty and staff,” Hickey said in a statement.

CNU established the business school in 2008 in honor of former Smithfield Foods Chairman and CEO Joseph W. Luter III, whose company had helped finance the school through a $5 million gift. Luter passed away last week at the age of 86.

The Luter School of Business currently has 323 juniors and seniors enrolled. The school is accredited by the Association to Advance Collegiate Schools of Business and offers a curriculum in business administration with concentrations in accounting, finance, management and marketing.

Virginia nursing homes sue state over Youngkin budget veto

SUMMARY:

  • 181 Virginia are suing the state over funding
  • Lawmakers approved a methodology change that would have provided additional $21.65 million in Medicaid funding for nursing facilities
  • The suit argues that ‘s veto is unconstitutional and Department of Medical Assistance Services has not applied rate methodology change

More than 180 Virginia nursing homes are suing the state after Gov. Glenn Youngkin vetoed a budget provision that would have increased Medicaid funding for their facilities. The homes argue the governor’s move is unconstitutional and has left them short on money needed to hire staff and care for residents.

The (VHCA-VCAL) says its 181 members have filed before the Supreme Court of Virginia against the (). The industry association claims DMAS is refusing to apply a rate methodology change lawmakers approved earlier this year.

“We had hoped it would not come to this, but VHCA-VCAL members have an obligation to exhaust every opportunity, including action, to ensure the care Virginia’s nursing home residents rely on for 24/7 support is funded appropriately,” VHCA-VCAL President Keith Hare said in a statement. “This legal action is really about patient care for some of our most vulnerable fellow citizens. It is imperative that nursing homes have the resources they need to appropriately staff facilities and provide their residents with the high-quality care they deserve.”

Earlier this year, the General Assembly approved a state budget that directed DMAS to raise Medicaid reimbursement rates for nursing homes, a move that would have resulted in an extra $21.65 million in federal and state funding being distributed to the state’s nursing facilities.

VHCA-VCAL stated that too many nursing homes are currently facing a funding gap between the cost of care and what Medicaid pays, because the Medicaid base rate remains too low. The association said it “successfully advocated” for a rate methodology change during the 2025 General Assembly session.

On May 2, Gov. Glenn Youngkin vetoed the provision (after previously recommending its removal), saying the two-year budget already included $40 million each year for nursing homes that met or exceeded performance thresholds.

“The amendment added this year by the General Assembly would add nearly $22 million in additional annual costs,” Youngkin wrote. “Given my fiduciary responsibility to Virginia’s taxpayers, it would not be fiscally prudent for me to expand ongoing programmatic expenditures at this time.”

However, Paul Nardo, clerk of Virginia’s House of Delegates, rejected the veto, arguing that Youngkin’s veto of that provision — among others — was not constitutional. According to a letter from Nardo, Youngkin only vetoed the provisions but failed to veto the budget appropriation that contained them. Based on previous Supreme Court rulings, Nardo said, Youngkin needed to veto the entire budget item, not just a provision.

The Virginia Mercury reported in May that Youngkin disagrees with Nardo’s stance and said he intended for the executive branch to operate as if the vetoes were in effect.

The petition says that DMAS ignored the law and failed to modify its rates using the methodology the General Assembly commanded. The asks the court to compel DMAS to increase the nursing facility reimbursement rates using the methodology required by the state legislature and accuses DMAS of “illegally” relying on an attempted veto by Youngkin.

“The governor’s unconstitutional veto is having a serious impact on the ability of nursing homes to hire and retain staff,” Hare said in a statement. “This is especially distressing as we know robust Medicaid funding is critical for continued quality care for Virginia’s seniors. Virginia must continue to invest in Medicaid nursing home care, not undermine efforts intended to boost the nursing workforce.”

DMAS did not immediately return requests for comment.

Youngkin’s press secretary, Peter Finocchio, issued the following statement in response: “Nursing homes have received significant Medicaid rate increases in recent budgets, resulting in total payments rising $842 million since 2020. In the current biennial budget, nursing homes received $163 million in increased payments. The new rate increase of $22 million annually passed by the General Assembly in 2025 — and vetoed by Gov. Youngkin — did not link these new funds to increases in quality. Virginians deserve better. And as the governor has previously stated, he believes this veto is wholly consistent with his powers under the Virginia Constitution.”

In its lawsuit, VHCA-VCAL alleges DMAS has taken no steps to modify its calculations using the updated methodology, and that, as a result, nursing homes are receiving less in reimbursements than they should. The association says the lack of funding is harming nursing homes in the state by making it difficult to maintain staffing levels.

Like Nardo, the association argues that while the governor can veto an item within a budget bill, a governor cannot veto a condition of an appropriation without also vetoing the money appropriated.

The association says the Supreme Court of Virginia has jurisdiction to issue a writ of mandamus to compel a government official to comply with a mandatory, nondiscretionary duty.

VHCA-VCAL’s member businesses operate more than 96% of Virginia’s Medicaid nursing facility beds. According to the association, nearly seven in 10 individuals in nursing facilities rely on Medicaid for their care.

Governor launches nursing home oversight board

On Thursday, Youngkin announced a newly established Nursing Home Oversight and Accountability Advisory Board, created by executive order, with an aim of strengthening oversight of nursing homes.

The governor’s office states that the board’s goal is to advise on initiatives to raise standards across nursing homes and recommend policies and practices that improve residents’ well-being and overall quality of care. The advisory board is expected to send the governor an annual report, which includes recommendations on budgetary, legislative and administrative measures.

“Supporting the needs of our older adults remains a top priority for my administration,” Youngkin said in a statement. “This initiative will carefully evaluate the full spectrum of aging and caregiving challenges, focusing on creating well-rounded solutions that address care deficiencies and improve access for our seniors.”

The 20-member board includes professionals with expertise in , direct care, advocacy, law and community service.

In addition to the advisory board, Youngkin’s August executive order directs the state’s health department to develop and maintain a publicly accessible nursing home information portal by Nov. 15, which will display inspection and survey results, disciplinary actions and key facility performance metrics. Youngkin says the aim of the portal is “to provide Virginians with clear and transparent insight into nursing home quality and compliance.”