Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

MicroStrategy expects Q1 loss as bitcoin value falls

MicroStrategy appears to have lost the coin toss — the toss, that is.

The world’s largest corporate bitcoin investor, -based reported an expected first quarter loss in a Securities and Exchange Commission filing on Monday due to the falling value of its  holdings in the .

After cresting at an all-time high of $100,000 in December 2024, bitcoin values fell below the $75,000 mark briefly on Monday.

MicroStrategy, which rebranded as Strategy in February, said in the SEC filing its unrealized loss on digital assets for the quarter ending March 31 was $5.91 billion. The company expects a resulting net loss for the quarter, although it will be “partially offset” by a related $1.69 billion income tax benefit.

Under the direction of bitcoin whale and company founder , MicroStrategy announced its first bitcoin purchase in August 2020, making it one of the first public companies to convert its cash treasury reserves into cryptocurrency as a store of value. The company now has the largest bitcoin trove of any public company.

At the end of the quarter, the company held approximately 528,185 bitcoins, purchased for about $35.63 billion, averaging approximately $67,458 a coin. On March 31, the total value of its holdings was about $43.55 billion. MicroStrategy reported it did not purchase any additional bitcoin between March 31 and April 6.

According to Coinbase, the nation’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, as of 12:20 p.m. on Tuesday, bitcoin was selling for $78,000.26 — making MicroStrategy’s holdings worth about $41.2 billion.

MicroStrategy said it “may not be able to regain profitability in future periods,” particularly if it incurs “significant unrealized losses related to [its] digital assets.”

Additionally, MicroStrategy said in the filing, “A significant decrease in the market value of our bitcoin holdings could adversely affect our ability to satisfy our financial obligations.”

The company could have to sell some of its bitcoin holdings to meet financial obligations, according to the SEC filing.

“As bitcoin constitutes the vast bulk of assets on our balance sheet, if we are unable to secure equity or debt financing in a timely manner, on favorable terms, or at all, we may be required to sell bitcoin to satisfy our financial obligations, and we may be required to make such sales at prices below our cost basis or that are otherwise unfavorable,” MicroStrategy said in the filing.

Despite the expected Q1 loss, Saylor, now MicroStrategy’s executive chairman, said Tuesday in a post on social media platform X: “Bitcoin is Digital Gold,” accompanied by a photo of himself sitting on blocks of gold with engraved bitcoin logos in front of a vault door.

MicroStrategy shares were trading for $268.74 as of 12:15 p.m. Tuesday, although at open, its shares were trading for $278.51.

Bitcoin was trading in the $80,000 range last week, even hitting $88,500 briefly on April 2 before dropping later in the day, and began a steep descent Sunday evening. On Monday, it dropped below $79,000.

Bitcoin’s drop comes amid worldwide volatility. Global markets plunged for several days after President Donald announced sweeping new tariffs on April 2, although markets opened higher on Tuesday.

Saylor has made bold pronouncements and statements about bitcoin in the past. In September 2024, he told CNBC that he thought the cryptocurrency could rise as high as $13 million per bitcoin by 2045, a prediction he repeated on Fox Business in December 2024, hours before bitcoin breached the $100,000 mark.

Saylor’s and MicroStrategy’s fortunes have turned before. He stepped down as CEO after MicroStrategy’s August 2022 earnings report, when the company disclosed that it had paid a total of $3.977 billion for its bitcoin, which at that time had fallen to a market value of about $2.451 billion. At that point, MicroStrategy also had taken on about $2.4 billion in loans and debt to acquire bitcoin. At points in 2022, the currency fell below $20,000 to prices it had not seen since 2020.

CoStar shakes up board of directors

Arlington County-based data and company is making major changes to its and launching a to scrutinize its finances as part of an agreement it entered with New York hedge funds D. E. Shaw group and Third Point.

As part of the terms of the agreement, which will be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, says its stockholders have agreed to customary standstill, voting and other provisions.

Widely known for its and brands, CoStar announced Monday that it appointed former S&P Global Ratings President John Berisford, former Etsy Chief Financial Officer Rachel Glaser and former Walt Disney Company CFO Christine McCarthy to the board. The company also revealed that “as part of its ongoing refreshment efforts,” CoStar Board Chairman Michael Klein would retire from the board, as would Hilton Worldwide CEO Christopher Nassetta and Laura Cox Kaplan, a communications executive and wife of Meta Platforms/Facebook executive Joel Kaplan.

Former Turner Broadcasting System executive Louise S. Sams succeeds Klein as board chairman, CoStar’s new board will comprise eight directors, seven of whom are independent.

“I am honored to take on this role as chair and excited for the tremendous value creation opportunity ahead,” said Sams, who was executive vice president and general counsel of Turner Broadcasting for nearly two decades, in a statement.

CoStar also announced that the board established a capital allocation committee to review the company’s capital structure, capital allocation priorities and financial targets. CoStar says the committee will review the company’s ongoing investment in Homes.com and ensure an appropriate timeline for profitability.

The committee includes Berisford, McCarthy, OptumInsight CEO Robert Musslewhite and CoStar founder and CEO Andy Florance, who will serve as the committee’s chair.

The company said board will also review the company’s executive compensation programs “to ensure management’s incentives remain aligned with stockholder value creation.”

In a statement, Florance said the changes to the board allow the company to “extend its long track record of creating stockholder value.”

CoStar plans to announces its quarter 1 earnings for 2025 on April 29.

“The changes announced today, coupled with CoStar’s leading franchises, position the company to create sustainable value for stockholders,” said Michael O’Mary, managing director at the D. E. Shaw group, in a statement.

In February, CoStar announced plans to fill more than 1,000 new positions, including hiring 500 new Homes.com sales professionals. However, the company also said it planned to eliminate roles from efficiencies gained by using AI and anticipates reducing some roles during normal annual performance management. The company did not say how many would be laid off. In March, CoStar announced that it had completed the $1.6 billion acquisition of Sunnyvale, California-based 3D digital twin technology company Matterport.

CoStar established a global operations center in Richmond in 2016 and has since grown that office to over 2,350 employees, becoming one of the Central Virginia region’s larger employers. CoStar announced it will complete a 1-million-square-foot campus along the James River in May 2026 and that the campus will house 3,500 employees.

Fitness center, library planned for former Military Circle Mall in Norfolk

Norfolk Mayor last week updated his city on plans to redevelop mall and the former Mall site.

During his State of the City address on Friday, Alexander announced that is planning a “state-of-the-art” fitness and wellness center and library for the east side of the city at the former site.

“The new facility will feature a cutting-edge library that incorporates the latest technologies, innovative design and services, focused on user needs to support learning, research and community involvement,” Alexander said.

He said the facility will serve an anchor for a planned mixed-use at the site of the former mall. Norfolk has partnered with Nashville, Tennessee-based Lose Design, which has an office in Fairfax, to begin planning for this development, the mayor added.

City spokesperson Kelly Straub said in an email that the scope of Lose Design’s work focuses on a feasibility analysis that identifies the essential programming needs for the community, which will lead to a conceptual design.

Demolition at the site could potentially begin late this year, Straub said, and the schedule for full design and construction will be finalized as part of the planning effort.

The city bought the 54-year-old, long-declining Military Circle Mall building and the surrounding 73 acres in 2020 for $11 million.

Sean Washington, Norfolk’s economic development director, previously told Virginia Business that plans would center on a tournament-caliber ice rink complex, plus residential, retail and hotel space. Asked if those elements are still being planned for development at the site, Straub replied that the fitness, wellness and library facility will be “a component” of the overall mixed-use development and that all other asset classes are still being evaluated.

Straub noted the redevelopment plans announced by the mayor are an early concept and that the city will solicit input from the community. Stakeholder input will begin immediately and will include focus groups and community meetings.

MacArthur Center finds a developer

Also on Friday, Alexander announced Hg80 as the master developer for plans to redevelop MacArthur Center mall in downtown Norfolk. He said the company has more than two decades of experience transforming retail and mixed-use spaces, such as Bethesda Row in Bethesda, Maryland, and Pike and Rose in North Bethesda, Maryland. Alexander said Hg80 brings “the expertise and innovation” needed to unlock the MacArthur site’s full potential.

Norfolk purchased the 23-acre struggling MacArthur Center mall for $18 million in 2023, including consulting and fees. At the time, Alexander said that buying the mall would enable the city to “play an active and strategic role” in the property’s future.

In 2024, Norfolk hired architectural consulting firm Gensler to conduct a study on the mall and what action the city should take with it. During his 2024 State of the City address, Alexander said the MacArthur Center is expected to be replaced by a major mixed-use development, which could be called “The Anchorage,” featuring a 400-room, military-themed hotel and 518,000 square feet of high-rise residential space.

Last year, Alexander said the development would have a 518,000-square-foot high-rise residential tower — with possibly 400 to 600 units — with rental and ownership options, plus 47,000 square feet of “luxury amenities” and active ground-floor leases. He said there would also be a 2-acre pedestrian-oriented promenade with more than 170,000 square feet of retail space. The plan is for the new development to completely replace the existing mall, except for the parking garages.

Straub said in a Tuesday email all of the proposed uses announced last year are “being formally evaluated.”

“Part of the scope of work with Hg80 is evaluating the current marketability and feasibility of the project as announced last year,” she said.

Supreme Court blocks order requiring Trump administration to reinstate thousands of federal workers

WASHINGTON (AP) — The Supreme Court on Tuesday blocked an order for the administration to return to work thousands of federal employees who were let go in mass firings aimed at dramatically downsizing the .

The justices acted in the administration’s emergency appeal of a ruling by a federal judge in California ordering that 16,000 probationary employees be reinstated while a plays out because their firings didn’t follow federal .

The effect of the high court’s order will keep employees in six federal agencies on paid administrative leave for now.

A second lawsuit, filed in Maryland, also resulted in an order blocking the firings at those same six agencies, plus roughly a dozen more. But that order only applies in the 19 states and the District of Columbia that sued the administration.

The Justice Department is separately appealing the Maryland order.

Will the tariffs lead to a recession? Here’s how to know if we’re in one

WASHINGTON (AP) — President Donald ‘s sharp tariff hikes last week have sent the stock market into a tailspin, raised alarm bells among executives, and heightened many economists’ worries that the U.S. could tip into .

The tariffs, set to take effect Wednesday, include a 10% blanket duty on nearly all countries and additional import taxes on 60 nations. The increases are so large and are taking effect so rapidly that they are likely to be disruptive to the , economists say, even if they are partially rolled back through negotiations in the coming weeks or months.

Economists at Goldman Sachs have raised their assessment of the odds the U.S. will experience a recession — where the economy shrinks and unemployment rises — to 45%, from 35% last week. And even that forecast assumes many of the duties are negotiated away or reduced. If not, “we expect to change our forecast to a recession,” Jan Hatzius, Goldman’s chief economist, and his colleagues said in an analyst note.

Other economists are raising similar alarms, with JPMorgan putting the odds of a recession at 60% and projecting will reach 4.4% by the end of this year, up from 2.8% currently.

Should the tariffs remain in place for an extended period, they will likely raise costs and uncertainty for businesses, which could reduce their willingness to hire, invest in new equipment or software, or expand into new markets. Americans could cut back on their spending in the face of higher prices. The economy could start to shrink, after expanding 2.8% in 2024.

So far, most measures of the economy, such as job gains, remain solid. Employers added more jobs than expected in March, the government reported last week, and remain historically low.

Still, surveys show consumers and businesses are increasingly worried about the economic outlook. What everyone from Wall Street investors to economists to officials at the will be watching closely is whether those concerns lead to a downturn.

Here are some questions and answers about recessions:

Are there any signs a recession is imminent?

Not yet. But one that has sparked widespread fear is a real-time economy tracker maintained by the Federal Reserve’s Atlanta branch. It now indicates that the economy could shrink by 0.8% at an annual rate in the first three months of this year, down from 2.4% in last year’s final quarter.

The Atlanta Fed’s tracker is not technically a forecast but instead a running tally that is updated as economic data is released.

Typically, a recession occurs when some short of shock hits the economy, such as the pandemic in 2020, or the bursting of the housing bubble in 2007. It’s not yet clear that tariffs will have a large enough impact to knock the economy into reverse.

But economists at Wells Fargo, in a note on Friday, calculated that the average U.S. tariff would jump tenfold to about 23% when all the duties are in place, the highest since 1908.

Such a shift “practically overnight will throw sand in the gears of global supply chains in ways that we have not seen since the pandemic and perhaps since World War II,” Shannon Grein, an economist at Wells Fargo, wrote.

What are Trump and his officials saying?

On Sunday, Trump told reporters that “sometimes you have to take medicine to fix something.” Yet Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on the same day said “there doesn’t have to be a recession” and that the administration is focused on “building the long-term economic fundamentals for prosperity.”

What signals would suggest that a recession has begun?

The clearest signal would be a steady rise in job losses and a surge in unemployment. The government’s weekly report on the number of people seeking unemployment benefits, which is released every Thursday, is being closely watched for signs of rising layoffs. So far, applications for aid remain quite low by historical standards.

Torsten Slok, chief economist for Apollo, an asset management firm, is watching a range of real-time data and sees some signs the economy is weakening. The number of people filing for bankruptcy has risen, while visits to Las Vegas have declined a bit. Weekly visits to movie theaters this year are below their levels in recent years, he said.

What other factors besides tariffs could slow the economy?

The Trump administration is plowing ahead with widespread job cuts in federal agencies, such as the Department of Health and Human Services, and says it will cut government spending. Both could weigh on the economy, at least in the short run.

And even if some of the tariffs imposed April 2 are pulled back or reduced, the uncertainty surrounding the Trump administration’s policies are likely to discourage spending by businesses or consumers. It’s unclear, for example, whether companies will build more factories in the U.S. — as the tariffs are intended to encourage — if they don’t know how long the tariffs will last.

Another factor could be overseas boycotts of U.S. goods and travel. Slok has noted that airline bookings data point to a 70% drop in trips from Canada to the U.S. in the next six months. While the effect on the overall economy is likely to be minor, Goldman Sachs estimates such changes could shave 0.2 percentage points off growth this year.

How might the Federal Reserve respond?

Many economists now expect the Fed will cut their key interest rate at their meeting in June and implement at least three reductions this year.

But the Fed is in a difficult position: With inflation seemingly stuck above its target of 2%, even before the tariffs take effect, the central bank would typically want to keep borrowing costs high to slow spending and cool inflation.

Yet if tariffs weaken the economy and lead to job losses, the Fed would normally slash its key rate to stimulate borrowing and spending. Since tariffs could worsen inflation, however, it is unlikely to do so until there are clear signs of a sharp economic slowdown.

“They can’t really be proactive here because they do have inflation to worry about,” said Gennadiy Goldberg, head of U.S. rates strategy at TD Securities. “What we’re looking at is a Fed that is going to be stuck between a rock and a hard place.”

On Friday, Chair Jerome Powell said the tariffs could worsen inflation and added that the Fed’s main obligation was to keep prices in check. His comments suggested the Fed will likely stay on the sidelines at its next meeting in May.

Who decides when a recession has started?

Recessions are officially declared by the obscure-sounding National Bureau of Economic Research, a group of economists whose Business Cycle Dating defines a recession as “a significant decline in economic activity that is spread across the economy and lasts more than a few months.”

The committee considers trends in hiring. It also assesses many other data points, including gauges of income, employment, inflation-adjusted spending, retail sales and factory output. It assigns heavy weight to a measure of inflation-adjusted income that excludes government support payments like Social Security.

Yet the organization typically doesn’t declare a recession until well after one has begun, sometimes as long as a year afterward.

Wall Street could be headed for a bear market. Here’s what that means

NEW YORK (AP) — Wall Street could soon be in the claws of another as the Trump administration’s tariff blitz fuels fears that the added taxes on imported goods from around the world will sink the global .

The last bear market happened in 2022, but this decline feels more like the sudden, turbulent bear market of 2020, when the benchmark index tumbled 34% in a one-month period, the shortest bear market ever.

Here are some common questions about bear markets:

Why is it called a bear market?

A bear market is a term used by Wall Street when an index such as the S&P 500 or the Dow Jones Industrial Average has fallen 20% or more from a recent high for a sustained period of time.

Why use a bear to refer to a market slump? Bears hibernate, so they represent a market that’s retreating. In contrast, Wall Street’s nickname for a surging market is a bull market, because bulls charge.

The S&P 500, Wall Street’s main barometer of health, closed 0.2% lower Monday after having been down by as much as 4.7%. It’s now 17.6% below the all-time high it set on Feb. 19.

The Dow industrials fell 0.9%, and the tech-heavy Nasdaq composite, which already was in a bear market, bounced back from an early slide to eke out a 0.1% gain.

The most recent bear market for the S&P 500 ran from Jan. 3 to Oct. 12 in 2022.

What’s bothering investors?

The  has ratcheted up fear and uncertainty on Wall Street over how businesses and consumers will respond.

followed through on tariff threats last week by declaring a 10% baseline tax on from all countries and higher tariff rates on dozens of nations that run surpluses with the United States.

Global markets cratered the next day, and the sell-off deepened after China announced it would retaliate with tariffs equal to the ones from the U.S.

Tariffs cause economic pain in part because they’re a tax paid by importers that often gets passed along to consumers, adding to inflationary pressure. They also provoke trading partners into retaliating, which can hurt all economies involved.

Import taxes can also cause economic damage by complicating the decisions businesses have to make, including which suppliers to use, where to locate factories and what prices to charge. And that uncertainty can cause them to delay or cancel investments that help drive economic growth.

The tariffs come at a time when the U.S. economy is already showing signs of slowing. Markets are also worried that tariffs could fuel inflation, which recently ticked higher.

How long do bear markets last and how deep do they go?

On average, bear markets have taken 13 months to go from peak to trough and 27 months to get back to breakeven since World War II. The S&P 500 index has fallen an average of 33% during bear markets in that time. The biggest decline since 1945 occurred in the 2007-2009 bear market, when the S&P 500 fell 57%.

shows that the faster an index enters into a bear market, the shallower they tend to be. Historically, stocks have taken 251 days (8.3 months) to fall into a bear market. When the S&P 500 has fallen 20% at a faster clip, the index has averaged a loss of 28%.

The longest bear market lasted 61 months and ended in March 1942. It cut the index by 60%.

When is a bear market over?

Generally, investors look for a 20% gain from a low point as well as sustained gains over at least a six-month period. It took less than three weeks for stocks to rise 20% from their low in March 2020.

Should investors sell now?

If you need the money now or want to lock in the losses, yes. Otherwise, many advisers suggest riding through the ups and downs while remembering the swings are the price of admission for the stronger returns that stocks have provided over the long term.

While dumping stocks would stop the bleeding, it would also prevent any potential gains. Many of the best days for Wall Street have occurred either during a bear market or just after one ended. That includes two separate days in the middle of the 2007-2009 bear market when the S&P 500 surged roughly 11%, as well as leaps of better than 9% during and shortly after the monthlong 2020 bear market.

Advisers suggest putting money into stocks only if it will not be needed for several years. The S&P 500 has come back from every one of its prior bear markets to eventually rise to another all-time high.

The down decade for the following the 2000 bursting of the dot-com bubble was a notoriously brutal stretch, but stocks have often been able to regain their highs within a few years.

Trump says high tariffs may have prevented the Great Depression. History says different

WASHINGTON (AP) — In the early days of the , Rep. Willis Hawley, a Republican from Oregon, and Utah Republican Sen. Reed Smoot thought they had landed on a way to protect American farmers and manufacturers from foreign competition: tariffs.

President Herbert Hoover signed the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act in 1930, even as many economists warned that the levies would prompt retaliatory tariffs from other countries, which is precisely what happened. The U.S. plunged deeper into a devastating financial crisis that it would not pull out of until World War II.

Most historians look back on Smoot-Hawley as a mistake that made a bad economic climate much worse. But tariffs have a new champion in President Donald Trump.

Like , Hoover was elected largely because of his business acumen. An international mining engineer, financier and humanitarian, he took office in 1929 like an energetic CEO, eager to promote public-private partnerships and use the levers of government to promote economic growth.

“Anyone not only can be rich, but ought to be rich,” he declared in his inaugural address before convening a special session of Congress to better protect U.S. farmers with “limited changes of the tariff.”

Instead, the 31st president got the Great Depression.

Trump, now championing his own sweeping tariffs that have sent global markets into a tailspin, argues that the U.S. was founded on steep import taxes on goods from abroad.

But the country began abandoning them when it created a federal income tax in 1913, the president says. Then, “in 1929, it all came to a very abrupt end with the Great Depression. And it would have never happened if they had stayed with the tariff policy,” Trump said in announcing his tariff plan last week.

Referring to Smoot-Hawley, he added, “They tried to bring back tariffs to save our country, but it was gone. It was gone. It was too late. Nothing could have been done — took years and years to get out of that depression.”

America’s of high tariffs actually continued well after 1913, however, and Trump’s take on what sparked the Great Depression — and Hoover-era Washington’s response to it — don’t reflect what actually happened.

Gary Richardson, an economics professor at the University of California, Irvine, said the U.S. long maintaining high tariffs “helped to shift industry here. But we’ve gotten rid of them because, as the country at the cutting edge of technology, we didn’t think they were useful.”

“When we were at our most powerful, right after World War II, we forced a low tariff regime on most of the world because we thought it was to our benefit,” said Richardson, also a former System historian. “Now, we’re going back to something else.”

Tariffs date to 1789

George Washington signed the Tariff Act of 1789, the first major legislation approved by Congress, which imposed a 5% tax on many goods imported into the U.S. With no federal income tax, the policy was about finding sources of revenue for the government while also protecting American producers from foreign competition.

After the War of 1812 disrupted U.S. with Great Britain, the U.S. approved more tariffs in 1817 meant to shield domestic manufacturing from potentially cheaper imports, especially textiles.

High tariffs remained for decades, particularly as the government looked to increase its revenue and pay down debt incurred during the Civil War.

The Tariff Act of 1890 raised taxes to 49.5% on 1,500-plus items. Championing the move was the “Napoleon of Protectionism,” William McKinley, an Ohio Republican congressman who would be elected president in 1896 and one of Trump’s heroes.

But that move caused prices to rise and the U.S. economy to fall. It worsened after the Panic of 1893, when unemployment reached 25%. Historians referred to the period as the “great depression” until it was superseded by the actual Great Depression.

An income tax replaces tariffs

A national income tax didn’t become permanent until Congress passed the 16th Amendment in 1909, and it was ratified four years later. Despite what Trump suggests, what followed was continued economic growth — fueled by technological advances like the telephone and increased consumer spending after World War I.

A construction boom, and increased manufacturing output — particularly for consumer goods that included the automobile — helped spark the “Roaring 20s.” The Jones Industrial Average increased six-fold — climbing from 63 points in August of 1921 to nearly 400 in September of 1929.

It was the Prohibition era and the jazz age, a period of urbanization even as farming remained a key economic driver. Working conditions were often poor, but the standard of living climbed for the middle class, which enjoyed innovations like broadcast radio and washing machines.

High tariff policy also persisted, with Congress approving the Fordney-McCumber Act of 1922, which raised levies to their highest in U.S. history on many imported goods in an effort to further bolster domestic manufacturing. That prompted retaliatory tariffs from key U.S. trading partners — mirroring the reactions of contemporary China and other countries to Trump’s new levies.

‘Black Tuesday’ and The Great Depression

The economy began slowing when the Fed raised interest rates in 1928 and the following year.

The idea was mostly to ease a market bubble by reducing lending to brokers or firms buying stocks. But that triggered higher interest rates in Britain and Germany, which helped slow global consumer spending and production, and began a U.S. in the summer of 1929.

The Great Depression began with “Black Tuesday” on Oct. 29, 1929, when a panic selloff triggered a stock market collapse, wiping out thousands of investors who had borrowed heavily. As consumer demand declined, manufacturing firms laid off workers and idled factories.

In subsequent years, the U.S. unemployment rate reached 25%, while economic output plunged nearly 30%. There were thousands of bank failures and widespread business closures, while millions of Americans lost their homes.

Smoot-Hawley

With self-made wealth and global sympathies, Hoover cut a very different figure than Trump.

Hoover was orphaned at 9 and led World War I-humanitarian food relief efforts while living in London. He also served as commerce secretary before running for president. He could be dynamic with small groups but reserved in public.

“There’s no theater to Herbert Hoover,” said David Hamilton, a history professor at the University of Kentucky.

Trying to keep his campaign promise to protect farmers, Hoover pushed Congress for higher agricultural tariffs. But a chief goal was encouraging farmers to produce new types of crops, and Hoover didn’t view steeper U.S. tariffs as incompatible with global trade, Hamilton said.

“He’s not weaponizing trade in the way we see today,” said Hamilton, author of “From New Day to New Deal: American Farm Policy from Hoover to Roosevelt, 1928-1933.”

Hawley, chairman of the House Ways and Means Committee, originally sought farming protections. But the finished bill went much farther, using high tariffs to protect manufacturing. It passed the House in May 1929.

Smoot, who chaired the Senate finance committee, helped oversee passage there in March 1930. Reconciled legislation that became the Smoot-Hawley Tariff Act finally cleared Congress that June.

Hoover was conflicted, especially after more than 1,000 U.S. economists signed a letter urging a veto. But he signed the act, saying in a statement, “No tariff bill has ever been enacted, or ever will be enacted, under the present system that will be perfect.”

That’s all a departure from another businessman-turned-president, Trump, who grew up wealthy and was a mogul and reality TV star who had never served in government before first winning the presidency in 2016.

Trump has long championed tariffs as a way to protect the U.S. economy and manufacturing at the expense of its global trading partners. And he bypassed Congress potentially modifying the scope of his policy aims by declaring an “economic emergency” to institute tariffs unilaterally.

Smoot-Hawley raised import tariffs by an average of 20% on thousands of goods, causing many top U.S. trading partners to retaliate. International cooperation on non-trade issues also declined, including on defense matters, helping clear the way for the rise of Hitler, Richardson said.

“There were some industries where they made profits,” Richardson said of Smoot-Hawley. “But overall, people in the U.S. and people around the world were losers.”

U.S. manufacturers saw foreign markets for their goods evaporate and output and consumer spending sank still further. Hawley lost the 1932 Oregon Republican primary in his district, and Smoot was defeated in November, as Democrat Franklin D. Roosevelt trounced Hoover for the presidency.

Smoot, Hawley and Hoover largely kept defending their tariff policies in subsequent years, blaming international trade policies and external monetary forces — as well as Democrats — for America’s economic woes. The economy wouldn’t begin its recovery until the outbreak of World War II increased demand for factory production in 1939.

“Economic depression cannot be cured by legislative action or executive pronouncement,” Hoover said in December 1930. “Economic wounds must be healed by the action of the cells of the economic body — the producers and consumers themselves.

Wall Street points to gains as global markets rebound on tariff roller coaster

World shares and U.S. futures advanced Tuesday, led by gains in Tokyo where the Nikkei 225 shot up just over 6% as markets settled after the shocks from President Donald Trump ‘s tariff hikes.

Japan’s Nikkei newspaper reported Tuesday that U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent would lead negotiations with the country, which as been buffeted by an escalating kicked off by Trump. Such negotiations are typically led by trade representatives, the Nikkei reported citing unnamed sources, hinting that currency imbalances may also be part of the reported talks.

Futures for the gained 1.7% before the bell, while futures for the Jones Industrial Average jumped 2.1%. Nasdaq futures climbed 1.5%.

Tuesday’s rebound followed a wild day on , where stocks careened after Trump threatened to crank his double-digit tariffs higher.

On Tuesday, ‘s Commerce Ministry said it would “fight to the end” and take unspecified countermeasures against the United States after Trump threatened another 50% tariff on Chinese .

Among the early gainers was Levi Strauss, which climbed more than 10% after beating analysts’ profit targets and forecasting a strong 2025, despite the ongoing trade war and tariff threats.

CVS Health climbed more than 8% after the drugstore chain named a new chief financial officer, effective later this month.

Shares of health insurers like Humana, United Health and Elevance rose sharply after the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services announced a 5.06% increase in Medicare payments for next year, which was stronger than expected. Humana, a company with a market capitalization of more than $30 billion, jumped nearly 15%.

Corporate earnings season kicks off this week with Delta Air Lines reporting on Wednesday and major U.S. banks offering up their latest results on Friday. The airline sector. which had been forecasting a strong 2025, has been one of the hardest hit during Trump’s tariff rollout.

Banks report their latest quarterly earnings on Friday, but most of the attention likely will be on their forecasts amid the rising global trade tensions ignited by Trump’s .

On Thursday, the government posts its latest data, which could play into the Federal Reserve’s next interest rate decision. Many economists have raised their odds of a U.S. because of the tariffs and suggest the Fed may have to step in and cut rates to help spur economic growth.

Trump’s trade war is an attack on the globalization that’s shaped today’s world economy and helped bring down prices but also caused manufacturing jobs to leave for other countries.

He has said he wants to bring factory jobs back to the United States, a process that could take years. Trump also says he wants to narrow trade deficits with other countries, but it’s unclear how much room for negotiation there is on the U.S. side or among its trading partners.

Indexes swung between losses and gains Monday, partly because investors are still hoping negotiations may forestall actual implementation of the stiff duties on all imports.

In Europe at midday, Germany’s DAX gained 1.9%, while the CAC 40 in Paris was up 1.7%. Britain’s FTSE 100 shot up 2.5%.

In Tokyo, the Nikkei 225 closed a smidgen over 6% higher, at 33,012.58.

Hong Kong also recovered some lost ground, but nothing close to the 13.2% dive Monday that gave the Hang Seng its worst day since 1997, during the Asian financial crisis.

The Hang Seng gained 1% to 20,036.03. The Shanghai Composite index jumped 1.4% to 3,140.15 after the government investment fund Central Huijin directed state-owned companies to help support the market with share purchases.

South Korea’s Kospi picked up 0.3% to 2,334.23, while the S&P/ASX 200 in Australia climbed 2.3% to 7,510.00.

Markets in Thailand and Indonesia tumbled, however, as they reopened after holidays. Trading was suspended briefly in Jakarta when the JSX index fell more than 9%. It was down 7.6% by midafternoon. Thailand’s SET lost 4.2%.

In Taiwan, the Taiex lost 4%, pulled lower by losses for Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Corp., or TSMC, the world’s largest computer chipmaker. Its shares fell 3.8% on Tuesday.

Hurt by worries that a global economy weakened by trade barriers will burn less fuel, the price of a barrel of benchmark U.S. crude oil dipped below $60 on Monday for the first time since 2021. Early Tuesday, it was up 18 cents at $60.88 per barrel.

Brent crude, the international standard, gained 17 cents to $64.38 per barrel.

In currency trading, the U.S. dollar fell to 146.90 Japanese yen from 147.85 yen. The euro fell to $1.0931 from $1.0905.

The price of gold rose $53 to about $3,027.00 an ounce.

Bitcoin gained about 6% to $79,550. On Monday it sank below $79,000, down from its record above $100,000 set in January.

China says it will ‘fight to the end’ after Trump threatens to impose still more tariffs

BEIJING (AP) — said Tuesday it would “fight to the end” and take countermeasures against the United States to safeguard its own interests after President Donald Trump threatened an additional 50% tariff on Chinese .

The Commerce Ministry said the U.S.‘s imposition of “so-called ‘reciprocal ‘” on China is “completely groundless and is a typical unilateral bullying practice.”

China, the world’s second-largest , has announced retaliatory tariffs and the ministry hinted in its latest statement that more may be coming.

“The countermeasures China has taken are aimed at safeguarding its sovereignty, security and interests, and maintaining the normal international order. They are completely legitimate,” the ministry said.

“The U.S. threat to escalate tariffs on China is a mistake on top of a mistake and once again exposes the blackmailing nature of the U.S. China will never accept this. If the U.S. insists on its own way, China will fight to the end,” it added.

Analysts and traders worry about a global

‘s threat Monday of additional tariffs on China raised fresh concerns that his drive to rebalance the global economy could intensify a financially destructive trade war. markets from Tokyo to New York have become more unstable as the tariff war worsens.

Trump’s threat came after China said it would retaliate against U.S. tariffs he announced last week.

“If China does not withdraw its 34% increase above their already long term trading abuses by tomorrow, April 8th, 2025, the United States will impose ADDITIONAL Tariffs on China of 50%, effective April 9th,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Additionally, all talks with China concerning their requested meetings with us will be terminated!”

If Trump implements his new tariffs on Chinese products, U.S. tariffs on Chinese goods would reach a combined 104%. The new taxes would be on top of the 20% tariffs announced as punishment for fentanyl trafficking and his separate 34% tariffs announced last week. Not only could that increase prices for American consumers, it could also give China an incentive to flood other countries with cheaper goods and seek deeper relationships with other trading partners, particularly the European Union.

Chinese people worry, but keep faith with their country

On the streets of Beijing, people said they found it hard to keep track of all the announcements, but expressed belief in their country’s ability to weather the storm.

“Trump says one thing today and another tomorrow. Anyway, he just wants benefits, so he can say whatever he wants,” said Wu Qi, 37, who works in construction.

Others were less sanguine. Paul Wang, 30, who sells stainless accessories, including necklaces, bracelets, and tongue studs to Europe, said the European market was now more important after the extra U.S. 50% tariffs and he would be watching to see which other firms in his field would be competing in that space.

Jessi Huang and Yang Aijia, whose companies import chemicals from the U.S., said the tariffs, including potential Chinese retribution, could force them to close up shop.

“It would be very hard and very likely to have a layoff, maybe even closing,” Huang said, “I might not be able to find another job if I get laid off.”

China isn’t out of options to retaliate

China still has a range of options to strike back at the Washington, experts said, including suspending cooperation on combating fentanyl, placing higher quotas on agricultural products and going after the U.S. trade in services in China such as finance and firms.

U.S. total goods trade with China was an estimated $582 billion in 2024, making it the top trader in goods with the U.S. The 2024 deficit with China in goods and services trade was between $263 billion and $295 billion.

Foreign Ministry spokesperson Lin Jian appeared to give short shrift to talk of dialogue with the Trump administration.

“I don’t think what the U.S. has done reflects a willingness for sincere dialogue. If the U.S. really wants to engage in dialogue, it should adopt an attitude of equality, mutual respect and mutual benefit,” Lin said.

In Hong Kong, where stocks were slightly higher Tuesday, Chief Executive John Lee blasted the latest U.S. tariffs as “bullying,” saying the “ruthless behavior” has damaged global and multilateral trade and brought great risks and uncertainties to the world.

Lee said the city would link its economy closer to China’s development, sign more free trade agreements, attract more foreign companies and capital to Hong Kong, and support local enterprises in coping with the impact of the tariffs.

___

Associated Press writers Chris Megerian, Josh Boak and Fu Ting in Washington, Christopher Bodeen in Taipei, Taiwan, and Kanis Leung in Hong Kong contributed to this report.

Roanoke ER doc seeks $20M in landmark whistleblower lawsuit

A Valley emergency room doctor’s $20 million goes to jury trial this week, with Dr. Thomas Bolton alleging that he was fired for complaining that HCA ‘s emphasis on shorter ER wait times at and its Cave Spring ER had a negative impact on patient safety.

The case is believed to be the first to be brought to trial under the Virginia Whistleblower Protection Law, which passed the General Assembly in 2020.

Bolton is seeking $20 million in damages in his lawsuit against his former employer, , a Glen Allen staffing and management services company that provides physician staffing for LewisGale Medical Center in Salem and the freestanding LewisGale Cave Spring ER in Roanoke County.

In Bolton’s original complaint, filed in 2023, Lewis-Gale Medical Center, Lewis-Gale Hospital and HCA Management Services were also listed as defendants, but in a January 2024 order, Judge James R. Swanson dismissed parties other than Lake Spring Emergency Group from the lawsuit. One of the nation’s largest for-profit hospital chains, Tennessee-based owns and operates about 2,400 health care sites, including the LewisGale facilities in the Roanoke area.

Bolton is represented by a Roanoke County firm, Virginia . One of his lawyers, Thomas E. Strelka, stated in a December 2024 email to Virginia Business that the case will be the first trial under the Virginia Protection Act, which broadened the protection of employees  speaking out against wrongdoing or abuse by their employers.

Bolton’s attorneys and attorneys representing Lake Spring Emergency Group, as well as an HCA spokesperson, did not immediately respond to interview requests for this story.

Emergency room doctors at the two LewisGale facilities, according to Bolton’s 2023 complaint, receive alerts when management feels ER wait times are too long. Both facilities also have large digital signs that display the average length of time patients can anticipate waiting before being seen by medical staff.

Bolton, who was hired by Lake Spring in 2018 to work at the LewisGale facilities in Salem and Cave Spring, repeatedly complained to management about ER doctors receiving alerts when HCA determined wait times were too long. He also reported other concerns to management, including that patients who needed to be admitted to the hospital were being left in the emergency room and that there were slow responses for transporting critically ill patients in need of “emergent surgical intervention,” as well as inadequate numbers of medical staff.

Lake Spring Emergency Group denies the allegations in court documents.

In 2021, Bolton alleged in his lawsuit, management placed him on a performance improvement plan related to his complaints about wait time alerts, an action Bolton considered retaliatory. However, Lake Spring stated in court documents that the performance plan was implemented due to “among other things, clinical efficiency, timely communication and punctuality.”

In January 2023, Bolton complained to management that an 800-pound man had been at LewisGale Medical Center’s emergency room for 45 hours without any lab work being ordered. Bolton called an administrator at night to stress that the patient needed to be admitted to the hospital.

A month later, Bolton learned his physician agreement was terminated and he would not be scheduled to work at either LewisGale facility beyond May 2, 2023.

“The decision to terminate Bolton was made by defendants in retaliation for his whistleblowing activity of the negative effect of defendants’ management decisions on patient care,” the complaint stated.

However, his former employer, Lake Spring stated in court documents that its actions regarding Bolton’s employment “were based on legitimate business needs and were taken without regard to Dr. Bolton’s rights, entitlements, actions or inactions under law.”

A claim for retaliation under the state Whistleblower Protection Law does not hold up, Lake Spring said in court filings, because Bolton “did not engage in any conduct protected by the statute and did not suffer a retaliatory action that was casually connected to such protected conduct.”