Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Va. Supreme Court denies Kanye West’s appeal

The day before Virginia’s absentee ballots were set to begin being sent out, the Supreme Court of Virginia denied an appeal from Kanye West’s campaign, a last-ditch effort by the rapper, producer and presidential candidate to appear on this year’s general election ballots.

On Thursday, the court dismissed without prejudice West’s appeal to the Richmond Circuit Court’s decision to disqualify him as a presidential candidate after two Suffolk County residents sued the Virginia Board of Elections on Sept. 1. They claimed that they were tricked into signing documents to become Virginia electors for West, an independent candidate who is widely considered a spoiler for President Donald Trump, although West has denied the claim.

The ruling says the Supreme Court of Virginia found it does not have jurisdiction over the case and that it was not “appropriate under the circumstances” to change the lower court’s temporary injunction, which disqualified West as a presidential candidate on this year’s Virginia ballots. The court also denied the appellants’ motion for a stay pending appeal, an administrative stay, a vacating summary or reversal as moot.

Plaintiffs Matthan Wilson and Bryan Wright were granted a temporary injunction by the circuit court Sept. 3, when Richmond Circuit Judge Joi J. Taylor ruled that 11 of 13 elector oaths submitted by West’s campaign in August were “obtained by improper, fraudulent and/or misleading means” or are invalid because of a notary’s “violations and misconduct.” Wilson and Wright said they didn’t know they would be expected to vote for West in the Electoral College and that they did not support his candidacy.

Taylor, in her ruling, also directed the elections board to “take all necessary measures … to provide notice to voters of Kanye West’s disqualification,” in the case of ballots already printed before the ruling. As for ballots that had not been printed, the board was prohibited from including West’s name.

Attorney General Mark Herring filed a brief Wednesday to the Supreme Court of Virginia arguing that “appellants are simply too late and the petition for appeal should be denied,” adding that all 133 localities have started producing ballots and are expected to begin sending batches by mail Sept. 18. Earlier in the week, Gov. Ralph Northam said there was a record-breaking number of requests for mailed absentee ballots — 790,000 statewide, as of Tuesday — due to the pandemic.

“I’m pleased the Supreme Court of Virginia agreed with me today and denied Kanye West’s appeal,” Herring said in a statement. “This case could have thrown the election into chaos, drastically changing the ballot and potentially disenfranchising tens of thousands of Virginians during an election that has brought challenges like none we have ever dealt with before. Today’s ruling will keep things on track and help to ensure that every single vote is counted in November.”

 

Subscribe to Virginia Business.

Get our daily e-newsletter.

Kanye West does not qualify as a candidate in Va., court rules

A Richmond Circuit Court judge ruled Thursday afternoon that Kanye West is not a viable presidential candidate on Virginia’s ballots — although his name is on some that have already been printed.

Judge Joi J. Taylor granted the injunction motion filed by two plaintiffs, Suffolk residents who said they were tricked into signing a form requiring them to support the hip-hop superstar and fashion designer as Virginia electors. Taylor ruled that 11 of 13 elector oaths submitted by West to appear on the November ballot were “obtained by improper, fraudulent and/or misleading means” or are invalid because of a notary’s “violations and misconduct.”

The suit was filed against the Virginia Board of Elections, which approved West’s appearance on the ballot Aug. 28, after the independent candidate’s campaign turned in paperwork on the Aug. 21 deadline. Some ballots already have been printed ahead of the state’s Sept. 4 printing deadline, the court acknowledged, so West’s name will appear on them, but the order directs the Board of Elections to “take all necessary measures … to provide notice to voters of Kanye West’s disqualification.” As for ballots that have not been printed, the board is prohibited from including West’s name.

The ruling comes after a wild scramble to stop West from appearing on the state’s ballots prompted by the two electors, who filed suit Sept. 1 and said they didn’t know they were expected to vote in the Electoral College for West when they were approached by campaign workers who asked them to sign a petition. Neither said they support his candidacy.

Attorney General Mark Herring’s office got involved Wednesday, filing a motion for an emergency hearing to prevent the inclusion of West’s name on ballots. West’s attorneys requested that Taylor remove Herring from the case, but the judge did not take up the matter Thursday.

The state was under serious deadline pressure because of the Sept. 4 printing deadline, so absentee ballots could be sent out by Sept. 19.

West is widely viewed as a spoiler candidate to benefit President Donald Trump, although West says they are not in cahoots.

 

Subscribe to Virginia Business.

Get our daily e-newsletter.

Emergency hearing on Kanye’s ballot quest set for Thursday

Updated 4:30 p.m.

Claiming that Virginia electors for Kanye West — hip-hop superstar, presidential hopeful and husband of Kim Kardashian — were obtained fraudulently, Attorney General Mark Herring requested an emergency hearing in Richmond Circuit Court on Wednesday to stop West’s name from appearing on the state’s ballots.

The hearing has been set for 2:30 p.m. Thursday in Judge Joi Taylor’s courtroom, according to Herring’s spokeswoman.

The state is under pressure, as some ballots have already been printed with West’s name, and the rest are due to be printed by Sept. 4 so they can be mailed to absentee voters, including those overseas or on military missions, by Sept. 19.

West’s application as a presidential candidate on Virginia’s ballot was turned in Aug. 21 to the Virginia Board of Elections. All qualified candidates must have notarized papers with the names of 13 electors who swear an oath that they “will, if elected, cast [their] ballot for the candidates for president and vice president named in the petition,” according to state law. Candidates also must file petitions containing 5,000 signatures of registered voters, 200 from each congressional district. As an independent candidate, West also was required to turn in a notarized “oath” for independent and third-party candidates. His running mate is Michelle Tidball, a spiritual coach who lives in Cody, Wyoming, where West also owns a ranch.

Everything looked fine on the surface, according to Herring’s motion, with verifiable signatures from the 13 electors and the notary’s stamp, but two electors claimed earlier this week they were misled into supporting West, who is widely viewed as a spoiler candidate to benefit President Donald Trump, although West says they are not in cahoots.

Plaintiffs Matthan Wilson and Bryan Wright, both of Suffolk, filed suit Tuesday, saying that they signed electors’ oaths under false pretenses — and that neither support West’s candidacy. In the suit, Wilson said he was riding his bike when he was approached by a representative of the West campaign, who asked him to sign “to be an ‘elector for the state'” but never mentioned that he was committing to vote for West in the Electoral College.

“Kanye West’s name was never mentioned,” Wilson said, according to the motion. He only learned what the document was after he was contacted by a news reporter. Similarly, Wright, who calls himself a “committed Republican,” said he did not know he had agreed to be an elector for the West-Tidball ticket.

In total, 11 of the 13 electors could be disqualified because of irregularities with notarization or alleged false pretenses, according to the suit brought by Wilson and Wright, and the attorney general says there may be “deficiencies” in all 13.

“The commonwealth of Virginia, including the state elections officials and entities named as defendants, does not tolerate any type of election fraud,” Herring said in a statement.

Subscribe to Virginia Business.

Get our daily e-newsletter.