Three Inova Health entities have agreed to pay more than $2.37 million to settle claims that Inova submitted Medicaid claims containing falsified information.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia announced on Friday the agreement with Inova Health System Foundation, Inova Health Care Services and Inova Physician Partners, settling the False Claims Act allegations.
The Falls Church-based Northern Virginia regional health care system submitted written disclosures to the U.S. Attorney’s Office and the Virginia Attorney General’s Office stating that between Jan. 1, 2020, and Aug. 31, 2020, it submitted claims to Medicaid for reimbursement — including resubmitted claims — for sterilization and hysterectomy procedures containing improperly modified documentation. One or more Inova employees improperly modified the documentation or requested the modifications, according to the disclosure, resulting in falsified information in the claims.
After an internal investigation, Inova “took remedial actions” and agreed that more than $1.58 million it’d received from Medicaid was improper, according to a news release from the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia.
In a statement, Inova said: “Inova identified an error in how certain Medicaid claims were submitted for reimbursement and we promptly self-reported and took corrective action to resolve the matter. As noted in the [Department of Justice] press release, ‘Inova received full credit under the Justice Department’s guidelines for taking disclosure, cooperation and remediation into account in False Claims cases.’”
The civil claims settled are allegations only, according to the U.S. Attorney’s Office, and no determination of civil liability has been made.
The U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of Virginia, the Department of Health and Human Services’ Office of Inspector General and the Medicaid Fraud Control Unit in the Virginia Office of the Attorney General coordinated on the case, according to a news release.
Inova Health has more than 24,000 employees across its five hospital campuses and multiple other care facilities, including Northern Virginia’s only Level 1 trauma center. The system treats more than 1 million patients a year, with more than 4 million patient visits annually.
Herndon-based federal contractor Paragon Systems agreed Tuesday to pay $52 million to resolve allegations by the U.S. Department of Justice that Paragon used its own subsidiaries to fraudulently win small business set-aside contracts, violating the federal False Claims and Anti-Kickback acts.
The company is one of the federal government’s largest providers of security, fire and emergency response and mission support services, according to the U.S. Department of Justice’s news release, and former top officials at Paragon allegedly directed female relatives and friends to “serve as figurehead owners of purported small businesses” to win set-aside contracts from the Department of Homeland Security that were meant to go to woman-owned small businesses and service-disabled veteran-owned small businesses, as well as other types of small businesses.
In 2020, Securitas Critical Infrastructure Services (SCIS) rebranded under its subsidiary Paragon Systems’ name. Paragon is a subsidiary of the Swedish security giant Securitas, which announced in September it had set a provision of $53 million to pay the settlement costs.
“The investigation relates to alleged misconduct by certain former employees and to Paragon’s relationship with various small business entities which were a direct or indirect party to contracts with the U.S. government starting around 2012,” Securitas said in a statement then. “Paragon is cooperating fully with the investigation.” According to a news release Thursday, the settlement will be paid throughout 2025.
In the alleged scheme, Paragon executives controlled Maryland-based limited liability companies Athena Services International and Athena Joint Venture Services, and these purported small businesses “surreptitiously paid substantial sums of money” — more than 300 payments totaling more than $11 million — as “consulting payments” to the former Paragon executives.
According to the DOJ, Paragon’s president, vice president of business development, vice president of operations, compliance manager and contracts manager were allegedly involved.
“Those who fraudulently procure, or assist others to fraudulently procure, small business set-aside contracts will be held accountable,” Principal Deputy Assistant Attorney General Brian M. Boynton, head of the Justice Department’s Civil Division, said in a statement. “When ineligible companies obtain contracts reserved for veteran owned or socially or economically disadvantaged businesses, they prevent the small business community from receiving the contracting opportunities that Congress intended.”
Athena Services International and Athena Joint Venture Services and their owner, Alisa Silverman, along with Paragon, agreed to pay more than $1.6 million to resolve their liability, as well as the allegations that ASI improperly received a Paycheck Protection Program loan that was forgiven in full. The DOJ filed a complaint against another purported small business, Patronus Systems, and its owner, Mabel O’Quinn, the news release said.
“This settlement is the largest civil recovery in over a decade by the Department of Homeland Security Office of Inspector General (DHS-OIG),” DHS Inspector General Joseph V. Cuffari said. “The settlement sends a clear message that the federal government will continue to investigate and prosecute fraud, waste and abuse to protect small businesses owned by service-disabled veterans and other socially and economically disadvantaged individuals. I am grateful for the continued partnership with the Department of Justice and for the whistleblower who initiated the complaint.”
Whistleblower Todd Pattison is set to receive more than $9 million as part of the settlement, the DOJ said.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau is ordering Navy Federal Credit Union to refund more than $80 million to customers and pay a $15 million civil penalty for allegedly charging illegal overdraft fees.
CFPB announced the actions against the nation’s largest credit union on Thursday. CFPB alleges that from 2017 to 2022, Vienna-based Navy Federal charged customers surprise overdraft fees on certain ATM withdrawals and debit card purchases, despite their accounts showing sufficient funds at the transaction times.
The $15 million civil penalty will go to CFPB’s victims relief fund, called the Civil Penalty Fund. According to a CFPB news release, the penalty is the largest that CFPB has levied against a credit union for illegal overdraft fees.
“Navy Federal fully cooperated with the CFPB’s investigation and we will continue to comply with all applicable laws and regulations, just as we always have and as we believe we did here,” The credit union said in a statement. “Nevertheless, this settlement enables us to focus on serving our members and their families. As a member-owned, not-for-profit credit union, we are focused on putting our members first.”
Additionally, the credit union stated, “over the past several years, Navy Federal has continued to comply with evolving expectations — including by automatically refunding certain overdraft fees since January 2023.” It will also eliminate “nonsufficient fund fees” for personal checking accounts in the first quarter of 2025, a reform it announced in October.
As of Sept. 30, Navy Federal had $180 billion in assets. The credit union has 360 branches, more than 14 million members and about 24,000 employees.
“Navy Federal illegally harvested tens of millions of dollars in junk fees, including from active-duty service members and veterans,” CFPB Director Rohit Chopra said in a statement. “The CFPB’s work to rid the market of illegal junk fees has saved American families billions of dollars.”
The CFPB said in a news release it found that Navy Federal violated the Consumer Financial Protection Act through charging surprise overdraft fees on purchases made with sufficient funds in consumers’ accounts at the transaction times and by charging overdraft fees resulting from delayed peer-to-peer payments that had undisclosed processing times.
Through its Optional Overdraft Protection Service, Navy Federal charged consumers $20 for most overdraft transactions and collected nearly $1 billion in overdraft fees from 2017 to 2021, according to the CFPB.
According to the CFPB, Navy Federal charged customers overdraft fees if a customer’s account had a negative balance once a transaction posted, although the account had had enough money to cover the transaction when the consumer made it. The credit union collected an average of $44 million annually in these fees, the CFPB alleges.
Navy Federal, the CFPB alleges, also charged overdraft fees when customers tried to use funds from payment services like Zelle, PayPal and Cash App that showed in Navy Federal systems as immediately available to spend but were still processing. The credit union did not disclose that payments received after 10 a.m. Eastern time initially, and later after 8 p.m. EST, wouldn’t post until the next business day. Navy Federal collected at least $4 million from these fines, according to the CFPB.
“We will continue to support and invest in our members — including the military, veterans and their families — to help them meet their financial goals,” Navy Federal said in a statement.
The past four years have been rough on Liberty University’s reputation, judging by the sheer tonnage of negative press that the Lynchburg-based evangelical education powerhouse has received.
But with a $2 billion-plus endowment and one of the nation’s largest private, nonprofit college enrollments, Liberty appears to be not only surviving but thriving, even amid embarrassing media stories about its former president and chancellor, Jerry Falwell Jr., as well as far more serious allegations brought by 22 former students and employees who claimed in the 2021 “Jane Does” lawsuit that Liberty officials discouraged them from reporting sexual assaults to authorities.
In 2022, the university settled with all but two of the Jane Doe plaintiffs for an undisclosed amount, but there’s been further turmoil branching from the class-action suit and a 2021 ProPublica exposé in which some plaintiffs went public with their names and stories.
In March, the U.S. Department of Education settled with Liberty, imposing a record-shattering $14 million fine against the university and issuing a 108-page report detailing thousands of violations of the federal Clery Act, which governs the public reporting of criminal incidents on university campuses accepting federal financial assistance funding.
According to the investigation, Liberty either omitted or incorrectly reported 93% of all 3,673 criminal incidents that allegedly took place on university-owned property from 2016 to 2023. More than 1,400 reports of rape, aggravated assault, stalking, domestic violence, hate crimes and other, less serious crimes like liquor law arrests and burglaries were kept off police incident logs and away from the public eye. Liberty’s fine is nearly $10 million more than the DOE’s second-highest penalty, $4.5 million, assessed against Michigan State University in 2019 following its gymnastics sexual abuse scandal.
Financially speaking, $14 million is hardly a crippling blow to the well-resourced Liberty, but what about its reputation among evangelical Christians, including prospective students and faculty members?
Consistent growth
It’s still too soon to know what, if any, impact the U.S. Department of Education’s record penalty will have on Liberty’s application and enrollment numbers, but Provost Scott Hicks says the Jane Doe class-action lawsuit and Falwell Jr. scandals have not had a significant negative impact on Liberty’s growth.
By any business measure, the university remains a booming success, with the state’s largest enrollment this academic year — approximately 98,000 undergraduate and graduate students, including about 83,000 online enrollees, according to the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia (SCHEV). In fall 2023, Virginia’s headcount of all college students grew by 15,273, and Liberty alone was responsible for 5,255 of those students, or nearly 35% of that growth, according to Tod Massa, SCHEV’s policy analytics director.
In the 2022-23 academic year, Liberty accepted $879 million in federal student aid funds, a revenue stream that could be in jeopardy if the DOE determines Liberty hasn’t ceased violating the Clery Act.
But in terms of growth, “we’ve been pretty resilient,” Hicks says. “We either get it right or wrong, and just like any other company … we try to get it right and improve upon it.”
The word “company” is not a slip of the tongue, notes the provost, who was director of retail operations for Mansfield Oil Co. before joining Liberty as a professor in 2007, later becoming dean of its business school. With more than 8,000 local employees, Liberty is Lynchburg’s largest employer.
“We operate more like a business that you would see around the city or throughout the country, versus academia,” Hicks says. “Residentially, we do have chairs, and we have deans and things like that. We have subject-matter experts, we have program directors. …The professors are coming together to not only add value to the learning experience, but also they hold it accountable. So, when you look at the way that we’re structured operationally, it enables us to deliver the value that people would expect from the [Liberty] brand.”
Meanwhile, residential enrollment at Liberty remains steady at about 15,000 students, Hicks says, and he estimates the school’s total 2024 enrollment — including part-time, nondegree remote students — will reach between 138,000 to 140,000 by the end of the year. To teach those students and “train champions for Christ,” as its mission says, Liberty employs more than 4,500 faculty members, many of whom are based outside of Lynchburg and teach online classes.
By August or September, Hicks anticipates rolling out a strategic plan for online and residential education, in which he expects Liberty “to continue to grow and continue to build.” Two major areas of focus are cybersecurity and health care courses, which are in high demand.
Hicks says that although Liberty’s remote work is attractive to prospective educators, the school has to compete for professors who teach in-demand subjects — as well as making sure they’re on board with Liberty’s Christian ethos.
“Liberty is a very unusual academic institution, compared to most. We’re Christian,” he says. “And we’re predominantly conservative in our thinking. That doesn’t mean that every person here is a conservative thinker, and that’s OK. But they believe in a moral absolute, and for the most part, that’s what drives them.”
‘A giant facelift’
Dustin Wahl, too, thinks Liberty will continue growing, although he has a different take on that than university officials.
A 2018 Liberty graduate, Wahl co-founded alumni group Save71 in 2020 to advocate for reforms at his alma mater, including pushing for Falwell’s resignation and an overhaul of the university’s board of trustees.
“There’s a lot of people in Liberty’s administration that breathed a sigh of relief when [Dondi Costin] became president, because it’s like, ‘OK, we can kind of become normal,’” Wahl says.
A retired Air Force major general who was the branch’s chief of chaplains, Costin earned two degrees at Liberty and was most recently president of Charleston Southern University in South Carolina. In July 2023, he started as Liberty’s president.
Costin succeeds Jerry Prevo, Liberty’s former longtime board chairman, who stepped in as interim president after Falwell’s departure in August 2020 amid revelations of a sex scandal involving his wife, Becki Falwell, and an erstwhile Miami pool boy. Falwell has since sued Liberty twice in federal court, seeking $8.5 million in retirement compensation and to bar the university from using the name and likeness of his father, Liberty’s founder, the late Rev. Jerry Falwell Sr., for a new campus center. Liberty is suing the younger Falwell for $10 million in a breach of contract suit in Lynchburg Circuit Court.
“Liberty essentially got a giant facelift” with Costin’s appointment, Wahl says. “As a leader, Dondi Costin is dramatically different from Falwell and Prevo. He’s qualified to oversee a large academic institution. He has experience working within institutions. He’s way less prone to scandal.”
Also, the school’s increased prominence in Republican national politics and partisan culture wars, especially since Falwell’s January 2016 surprise endorsement of Donald Trump, has changed the character of the student body, making it less vulnerable to external slings and arrows, Wahl asserts.
“Christians who … aren’t really into politics and just kind of want to go to a Christian school, that group has shrunk, and more and more of them are not enrolling [at Liberty],” he says. “On the other side, you have more people from Trump country, and Liberty puts its ads on Fox News. That’s who they’re going for, so you have more of those people. They don’t care about what the Department of Education says. In terms of overall enrollment, I don’t think [the fine is] going to make a real impact.”
Although Falwell was careful to make the Trump endorsement on his own behalf and not the university’s, his post as president of Liberty caused some conflation between the two, Liberty General Counsel David Corry says. “I don’t think we stepped over a legal line [as a nonprofit, 501(c)(3) entity] … but there’s a heavy price to be paid for being so closely identified with a polarizing political figure like that.”
Prevo did not endorse a candidate in the 2020 presidential election, and Corry expects Costin to maintain the same course in 2024.
Nonetheless, Liberty still plays an outsize role in conservative political discourse. U.S. Sen. Marco Rubio spoke at a Liberty convocation last October, and Costin has made several statements in support of Israel following Hamas’ Oct. 7, 2023, surprise attack on Israeli civilians near the Gaza border.
After The Washington Post’s October 2023 story based on a leaked, preliminary version of the Clery Act report about Liberty, Costin chose to respond on Fox News.
DOE investigators, Costin said then, are “claiming that we acted in bad faith. I think there are a number of factual errors in the report … and [Liberty hasn’t] had the opportunity to respond in a way that would allow us, at least in a public setting, to counter these assertions that have been made with factual errors.”
Corry, Liberty’s general legal counsel since 2011, takes a similar rhetorical approach, highlighting the $10 million Liberty has spent on improved campus lighting and hiring more Title IX and Clery Act staff since 2022 — while also implying that politics may have played a role in the DOE investigation of the university.
U.S. Sens. Tim Kaine and Mark Warner, “bless their hearts, asked the Department of Ed. to come after us, and so the department started that Clery review,” Corry says.
Warner and Kaine, both Democrats, did in fact call for the DOE to investigate Liberty’s handling of sexual misconduct claims in November 2021 after ProPublica’s report came out, according to the senators’ offices.
In a statement following Liberty’s $14 million fine, Kaine and Warner called their investigation request “a reasonable step to ensure student safety. Liberty has entered into a voluntary settlement of the claims, and the senators expect that the terms will be honored by all parties.”
Liberty’s public statement in March also included some defiant words, alleging that the university “repeatedly endured selective and unfair treatment by the Department [of Education].”
But it also had notes of humility, as the university acknowledged “numerous deficiencies that existed in the past. We acknowledge and sincerely regret past program deficiencies and have since corrected these errors with great care and concern.” The statement concluded with a declaration: “It is a new day at Liberty University.”
Costin twice canceled scheduled interviews with Virginia Business for this article, and Liberty’s spokesman said he would not be available for an interview before the April 2024 issue’s print deadline.
Moving forward
S. Daniel Carter, a Tennessee-based campus safety expert who helped craft the current version of the Clery Act established in 2015, says Liberty was not singled out over its evangelical Christian prominence or its conservative Republican Party affiliations.
“The people who conducted this [DOE] review are people I’ve worked with for decades,” he says. “They are not political appointees. They have, year in [and] year out, taken methodical steps to enforce the Clery Act at all kinds of institutions, including many smaller religious institutions, over the years.”
The DOE’s 2010 finding that Liberty was not reporting crime statistics appropriately — as cited in the 2024 report — and Liberty’s failure to implement a reporting system in the intervening years were much more relevant factors, Carter says.
If there is a religious influence on the Clery Act, he adds, it has to do with the school’s strict code of conduct, known as the Liberty Way, which forbids use of alcohol, requires modest dress and prohibits “sexual activity, inappropriate personal contact, any state of undress in inappropriate circumstances, or spending the night with a member of the opposite sex.”
Carter, who advised one of the Jane Doe plaintiffs, says he views the school’s code of conduct as “inextricably linked” with the sexual assault allegations made against former Liberty students and a senior administrator in the Jane Doe lawsuit and referred to in the DOE report. Some plaintiffs claimed that the school rules were “weaponized” against students who wished to report sexual assaults by leading them to believe they would get in trouble for violating the code of conduct.
“The Liberty Way,” Carter says, “was simply at odds with the Clery Act’s requirements. To the extent that there is any religious nexus, that’s it. The law is clear. The law does not allow a federally funded institution of higher education to … afford students and employees who report sexual misconduct any less protection than any other institution. And that’s what this report finds happened, and Liberty, as part of their settlement, does not contest that.”
Corry disputes the argument that the Liberty Way was used to discourage students from reporting sexual assaults, although he acknowledges that the school could have done more to educate students on the issue.
“People just weren’t getting the message that that isn’t the way we do business,” Corry says. “A lot of old rumors and old wives’ tales and old, ‘Hey, be careful, word to the wise’ stuff … gets passed down and accepted as truth. Lore can undermine your desire to have an open [sexual assault reporting] process, where people feel like they will be respected. It is trauma-informed. It is open, and we’re not going to play ‘gotcha’ with curfew violations and alcohol and drug violations when there’s much bigger, more serious things to be ferreted out, like rape and sexual assault, and people feeling unsafe.”
Wahl says that although he thinks Costin and other university officials have continued to deflect blame from Liberty, he’s still hopeful about Costin’s leadership. “I believe that Liberty is trending in a very positive direction, when it comes to policies and procedures and keeping students safe, and I think Costin is a part of that.”
And while the Falwell lawsuits linger, and Liberty must report to the DOE through April 2026 under the settlement, the school will keep focusing on expanding its degree offerings and creating Christian leaders, including in the secular world.
“We want leaders,” Hicks says. “We want you to be the best employee, then we want you to be the best leader, even to being the best … attorney or judge or politician or CEO. Whatever your role is, we just want you to do it in a way that honors God.”
At a glance
Founded The private, nondenominational, conservative Christian Liberty University was started by Jerry Falwell Sr. and Elmer Towns as Lynchburg Baptist College in 1971, later named Liberty Baptist College and, finally, Liberty University in 1984.
Campus Liberty sits on a 7,000-acre campus in Lynchburg with more than 180 buildings and structures, including the 25,000-seat Williams Stadium and the 275-foot-high Freedom Tower. The Vines Center hosts twice-weekly convocations featuring national speakers that have included former President Donald Trump; former first lady Melania Trump; former U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo; presidential candidates Ted Cruz, Ron DeSantis and Bernie Sanders; former National Rifle Association head Wayne LaPierre; and comedian Jeff Foxworthy.
Enrollment 101,554 (Fall 2023)*
Student profile
Residential: 47% male, 53% female
Online: 41% male, 59% female
Academic programs
Liberty offers more than 700 total programs of study, with more than 600 available online and 350 on the Lynchburg campus. It has 15 colleges and schools, including the College of Osteopathic Medicine and the School of Law.
Faculty
Approximately 4,500 full- and part-time faculty, according to Provost Scott Hicks
Tuition, fees, housing and dining
Residential undergraduate tuition and fees: $23,800
Room and board: $12,920
Online undergraduate tuition: approximately $9,360 per year
*According to the State Council of Higher Education for Virginia, this number includes all residential and enrolled undergraduate, graduate and professional degree students. According to Liberty, total enrollment exceeds 135,000.
The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau fined Richmond-based Atlantic Union Bank on Thursday for illegally enrolling thousands of customers in checking account overdraft programs, according to a news release.
The enrollments took place between 2017 and 2020, according to the bank. The bureau found that Atlantic Union, a subsidiary of Atlantic Union Bankshares, misled consumers who enrolled in the overdraft service by phone and failed to provide proper disclosures.
The CFPB is ordering Atlantic Union to refund at least $5 million in illegal overdraft fees and pay a $1.2 million penalty to the CFPB’s victims relief fund.
“Atlantic Union Bank harvested millions of dollars in overdraft fees through a host of illegal practices,” CFPB Director Rohit Chopra said in a statement Thursday. “Americans are fed up with junk fee scams, and the CFPB will continue its work to ensure families are treated fairly.”
The bureau outlined two ways it says the bank violated federal law: charging fees without proper consent and misleading customers about the terms and costs of overdraft coverage.
The bank does not admit any wrongdoing under the settlement.
“We respectfully disagree with the CFPB’s conclusions about these historical practices and take very seriously our obligation to comply with applicable law,” Atlantic Union CEO John Asbury said in a statement. “We are, and have always been, committed to treating our customers fairly and providing them with the information they need to help them make financial decisions that work for their lives. Nonetheless, we believe it is in Atlantic Union’s best interest to settle this matter so we can continue focusing on providing the products, services and support our customers want.”
Atlantic Union said, in its own release, that before Thursday’s settlement, it proactively made improvements to its overdraft program.
“In 2022, Atlantic Union also reduced or eliminated certain overdraft-related fees to help reduce the burden of such fees on customers. Among other changes, it eliminated fees on consumer accounts for items returned unpaid due to insufficient funds; reduced the number of overdraft fees that can be charged per day to a single account; and introduced a ‘no-overdraft’ checking product,” the bank said in a news release.
Atlantic Union Bank had 109 branches in Virginia, Maryland and North Carolina as of the end of September, and it had more than $20 billion in total assets as of March 31.
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept All”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies. However, you may visit "Cookie Settings" to provide a controlled consent.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.