Please ensure Javascript is enabled for purposes of website accessibility

Blue Ridge Bank names CEO

G. William “Billy” Beale became CEO of Blue Ridge Bank National Association on Sunday, giving the bank a leader separate from that of its parent company, Charlottesville-based Blue Ridge Bankshares Inc.

“I am excited to have the opportunity to join this team at a critical time in the banking industry,” Beale said in a statement. “Blue Ridge Bank has a unique community banking model with strong credit quality, diverse revenue streams, robust local market teams and sophisticated and innovative products.”

Brian K. Plum will remain the holding company’s president and CEO, focusing on broader strategy, technology and business line initiatives.

“Billy joining the team to lead Blue Ridge Bank provides the company with an experienced and successful bank executive who will be additive as we work to create shareholder value,” Plum said in a statement. “I have watched and admired Billy’s success during my career and am incredibly pleased to have him join Blue Ridge as a teammate.”

From November 2018 to July 2020, Beale was president and CEO of Midlothian-based Community Bankers’ Bank and he still serves on that bank’s board. Before that, Beale was CEO of Richmond-based Union Bank & Trust, now known as Atlantic Union Bank. During his tenure, from 1991 to March 2017, the bank’s total assets grew from $180 million to $8.5 billion. Beale joined a forerunner of the bank in 1989. From 1971 to 1989, Beale was an executive and commercial lender for Capital Bank and Security Bank, in Texas.

Beale received his bachelor’s degree in business administration from The Citadel, in South Carolina, in 1971, and he graduated from the Southwestern Graduate School of Banking at Southern Methodist University in 1981.

Chartered in 1893, Blue Ridge Bank has 26 locations in Virginia and one in North Carolina. As of March 31, Blue Ridge Bankshares Inc. had $3.33 billion in assets. At 11:10 a.m. on Monday, the company’s share price was $7.96, up 5.71% from its previous close price.

Va. bankers say they’re not worried by SVB collapse

Last weekend was pretty tense for bankers, even for those leading institutions quite distant and different from Silicon Valley Bank, which Friday became the second largest bank to fail in U.S. history. Federal regulators shut down SVB after a run on the bank. By Sunday, regulators also shut down New York’s Signature Bank, which became the third biggest bank ever to fail in the United States.

As word spread about SVB customers pulling out their money due to fears the FDIC would back only $250,000 per account, stocks dropped for banks everywhere, including in Virginia. “Friday, all banks got painted with the brush of fear,” Rex Smith, United Bank’s Central Virginia regional president, said Monday. “It was a lot of fear and misinformation and lack of information.”

United Bank’s stock rebounded a bit on Monday, as people learned more about what happened at SVB, which had $209 billion in total assets in December and was a major backer of venture capital-backed tech startups. According to NPR, 90% of SVB’s deposits were above the federal insurance cap of $250,000, and VC investor Peter Thiel’s Founders Fund members withdrew millions from the bank, leading to what Judy Gavant, chief financial officer of Blue Ridge Bankshares Inc., called “just one of those old-fashioned runs on the bank.” SVB investors and depositors attempted to remove $42 billion from the bank on Thursday alone, said a California state regulator.

On Sunday and Monday, the White House and federal regulators took emergency steps to ensure that SVB and Signature Bank customers will have access to their deposits, which helped calm fears among startup entrepreneurs and their funders. U.S. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and President Joe Biden both emphasized that taxpayers would not be on the hook for reimbursing SVB and Signature account holders, with the money coming from the FDIC’s Deposit Insurance Fund, which banks pay into.

Biden also said that the bank executives responsible would be fired and that the banks’ investors would not be bailed out. “They knowingly took a risk and when the risk didn’t pay off, the investors lose their money. That’s how capitalism works,” Biden said during a Monday morning address from the White House.

Furthermore, in a move designed to prevent more bank runs, the federal government announced it had also initiated backstop measures to protect the entire nation’s banking deposits, safeguarding banks from $300 billion in securities losses.

Banks everywhere still suffered some financial fallout from the banking crisis, however, as investors sold off banking shares and sought safety in gold and Treasurys, kicking off the largest drop in regional bank stocks in three years.

And Virginia was no exception. Blue Ridge Bank, based in Charlottesville, saw its stock drop 8.97% Monday, and Fairfax-based FVCbank’s stock fell 11%. Share prices for Richmond’s Atlantic Union Bank, the largest regional bank headquartered in Virginia, with 2022 deposits of $15.7 billion, fell by 6.69% to $33.74 Monday.

However, the “unique risk factors” that affected SVB are not issues likely to impact the community and midsize banks here in Virginia, said Andy Farmer, spokesman for the Virginia State Corporation Commission, which regulates the commonwealth’s 47 state-chartered banks. “Virginia’s banking industry remains strong and well-capitalized.”

Atlantic Union CEO John Asbury noted the difference between his bank and the two that were shut down last week: “These are nontraditional banks engaged in nontraditional activities that grew rapidly. We are a full-service traditional banking facility.” Silicon Valley Bank, he said, was started to serve tech startups backed by venture capital firms. However, venture capital funding and loans for tech startups started to dry up in the past year, leading the startups to seek more withdrawals from the bank, Asbury said. SVB was invested heavily in long-term securities that weren’t liquid, though, and when the bank couldn’t find a buyer, SVB sold $21 billion in fixed-rate securities last week at a $1.8 billion loss in an unsuccessful attempt to hold off the bank run.

“All of this frightened their customers,” Asbury said. By contrast, his bank and others in Virginia have little to do with the tech startup industry, at least compared to SVB, and Atlantic Union has never had a losing financial quarter since its founding in 1902, Asbury added. Meanwhile, New York-based Signature Bank was a major lender to the cryptocurrency industry, which, Asbury said, is “very unstable” and largely unregulated.

The federal government’s actions are meant to “avoid a crisis in confidence in banks,” Asbury said, but he and others in the industry said Monday they haven’t fielded many calls from customers about the situation.

“The banking system is safe, sound, well-capitalized, so this is very different from the fall of 2008,” when the collapse of Lehman Brothers, the fourth-largest U.S. investment bank, amid the Great Recession kicked off an international banking crisis, Virginia Bankers Association President and CEO Bruce Whitehurst remarked Monday. “That was a very different situation from the one we have today.”

Some Virginia banks have emailed or called their customers to reassure them that their funds are safe, and that the situation at the two shutdown banks was quite different from a typical community bank.

Reston-based John Marshall Bancorp Inc. put out a news release Monday affirming that the bank’s “financial condition remains strong.” The bank issued the release, it said, to “inform our shareholders as well as the customers and employees of the Bank that we are of sound financial condition, [and] our business model differs materially from that of SVB’s.”

For any individual or corporate customer who has less than $250,000 in savings at a bank, Whitehurst said, the current banking situation is not a big deal, but for any company “trying to make payroll, it is. If they have any questions or concerns, they should talk to their banks. It’s always a good idea for business owners to have an ongoing dialogue with their bankers.”

Steve Yeakel, president and CEO of the Virginia Association of Community Banks, dismissed the dips in bank stocks Friday and Monday as “nothing more than noise,” adding that he expects it all to be a footnote “in two or three weeks.”

One longer-lasting outcome of the situation, though, could be more banking regulations, though that could also include raising the federal insurance cap of $250,000 for business banking customers, which would be welcome news, Virginia bankers said. “I think it’s good that regulators are taking a second look at FDIC limits,” Smith said.

Embedded finance

Several years ago, Blue Ridge Bank President and CEO Brian Plum began to notice a movement across the broader economy.

“We live in a world where data has value,” Plum says. “It only made sense that over time, [as] you would see more sellers or other service providers that have built out platforms to try to serve the needs of their consumers, that financial services would become the target of it.”

Banking as a service (BaaS) is a model that lets banks partner with other kinds of businesses — for instance, financial technology startups — to provide banking services such as extending credit and loans through the partner’s brand via vehicles such as websites, apps or credit cards. Examples include buy now, pay later providers like Afterpay and companies like Apple Inc., which offers a branded credit card issued by Goldman Sachs Bank USA.

The arrangement nets banks more customers and deposits and spares partner businesses the expense and obstacles involved with acquiring banking licenses.

Expanding technology

Embedded finance — integrating financial services into nonbanking websites, apps or other platforms — is at the heart of banking as a service. Through application programming interfaces (APIs), banks can allow partner companies to provide payment processing, credit cards, loans and other services.

According to a study by Cornerstone Advisors, embedded finance will cumulatively generate $230 billion in revenue by 2025, and the BaaS market could grow to more than $25 billion in annual revenue for banks in 2026.

Fairfax-based MainStreet Bank subsidiary Avenu is developing its platform, which will move into beta testing later this year, with multiple APIs. A fintech firm or other third-party provider will be able to integrate Avenu into its app, so that customers can open accounts, get debit cards and otherwise treat the partner as a bank.

In 2020, Charlottesville-based Blue Ridge formed its first BaaS provider partnerships with Unit, Increase and jaris.

Burlingame, California-based jaris is one of several fintech partners of Blue Ridge, providing its software company partners embedded finance for lending, particularly to small businesses.

Although several analysts point to the 2006 debut of Walmart’s MoneyCard — a prepaid Visa card issued by Green Dot Bank — as the inception of BaaS, the field has grown as tech companies, including buy now, pay later providers, have proliferated.

“All the products that companies are offering as banking-as-a-service products didn’t exist up till five to six years ago. That’s why we’re really seeing such a surge in it right now,” says Matt Frankel, a certified financial planner and contributor to Alexandria-based The Motley Fool’s subsidiary, The Ascent.

Avenu President Todd Youngren points to the pandemic as a reason for BaaS’ rise, since people were staying away from physical banks. Some banks have closed branches in recent years.

“In banking as a service, the bank is coming to you,” says Blue Ridge Executive Vice President Brett Taxin.

BaaS partnerships allow Blue Ridge Bank to compete with larger banks, says Executive Vice President Brett Taxin. Photo by Will Schermerhorn
BaaS partnerships allow Blue Ridge Bank to compete with larger banks, says Executive Vice President Brett Taxin. Photo by Will Schermerhorn

Why banks participate

What does BaaS offer for banks? The short answer is growth. Virginia banks can tap into new markets through these partnerships, Youngren says, gaining digital customers from across the United States, and achieve growth without adding physical branches. 

BaaS allows “us to amplify our presence and really redefine community banking in the digital age and to serve customers that are beyond our branch footprint,” Taxin says.

Banks also receive low-cost deposits through partnerships in which third-party partners use for-benefit-of accounts, which let them pool their customers’ funds without assuming legal ownership of the account and the regulatory requirements that would come with it. 

Chesterfield County-based payment and invoice automation company Paymerang holds an FBO account with its partner, The Bancorp Bank. To reassure its roughly 500 midsize company clients — largely in private K-12 and higher education, hospitality and health care — that Paymerang is not delaying payments in order to earn interest on their funds, the firm does not earn interest on its deposits, instead allowing the bank to retain it.

Banks earn money from the fees they charge partners for their services, too, although the structures vary by partner agreements. Paymerang’s fee structure is per unit, while MainStreet Bank is planning on using a flat fee but has built models that allow for per-unit or percentage fees.

Banks partner with other businesses instead of offering services themselves because they can’t always get as deep into a skillset as specialized fintech businesses can, says Alison Holt-Fuller, Atlantic Union Bank’s head of product and enterprise first line risk management. Third-party partners provide vehicles for banks to efficiently expand their offerings.

Fintech firms also have better data access. “It’s the holy grail of marketing information and knowledge about customer behaviors,” Plum says. “As a financial service provider, it’s right there. You know what people spend money on. You know what they see.”

Banks often trust fintechs to handle lending processes because of their access to consumer data, says Ting Xu, assistant professor at the University of Virginia’s Darden School of Business. Their algorithms can include more factors than banks can.

Who’s in the game?

Although big players are on the scene, small and midsize banks tend to be the main providers in BaaS, says Cornerstone Advisors Chief Research Officer Ron Shevlin. At least partly, the incentive for third-party businesses to partner with smaller banks is that, due to the Durbin amendment, banks with $10 billion or less in revenue can charge higher debit card swipe fees to retailers or other end users. That means that a smaller bank would have more revenue to share in a 50-50 split with a third-party provider — for example, $1 each from a $2 fee — than a larger bank, whose fees are capped.

BaaS partnerships also help level the playing field for small banks who not only compete against bigger banks for BaaS clients but also corporations like Walmart and Amazon.com Inc., which have long aimed to become financial services providers. In January, JPMorgan Chase announced its technology budget was $12 billion, much more than small banks can spend on developing financial service offerings themselves.

“It helps us compete against the largest institutions that are spending a lot more than we are,” Taxin says. “It allows us to survive and, ideally, thrive.”

As bigger banks decide to enter the BaaS market, though, they might compete for third-party partners by taking a lower share of the revenue, Shevlin says.

What those third-party businesses won’t find with a larger bank is the “white glove” treatment that Youngren says MainStreet gives its partners.

“Community banks have that high-touch, high customer service feel that you don’t get with a larger bank,” Youngren says.

Plus, BaaS “allows us, where possible, to try to bank and do some good in the world,” adds Taxin, noting that a growing number of people in disadvantaged communities who struggle to open banking accounts or receive loans can be aided by third-party financial technology companies.

For businesses that wish to incorporate financial services like lending or payment processing into their offerings, BaaS partner-ships with banks let them do so without going through the lengthy, complex and expensive process of getting a bank charter.

“We can bring our knowledge and our experience with compliance and couple it with the banking products that we have and then allow fintechs to take advantage of that,” Youngren says. “It really will allow these fintechs to get to market faster in a compliant manner than if they just came to a bank and said, ‘I want to open up a bank account.’”

With MainStreet Bank assisting with compliance and back-end processes through its Avenu subsidiary, partners can focus on doing what they do best — marketing products that speak to their communities.

Paymerang’s partnership with The Bancorp Bank provides the company with fraud prevention and card management services while making sure that Paymerang adheres to federal regulations. For Paymerang, The Bancorp Bank’s “positive pay” automatic cash management service helps prevent fraud, since the bank compares checks against Paymerang’s list before clearing them.

Banks also provide capital for partner businesses that offer loans, which keeps the businesses asset-light and nimbler, Xu says.

Buy now, pay later

One aspect of BaaS that is more controversial is the “buy now, pay later” (BNPL) model that has begun popping up on online shopping sites at checkout, offered by providers such as Affirm and Afterpay.

According to a report in February by Accenture, Americans spent $20.8 billion last year using BNPL services, which don’t require much approval by banks, compared with credit card approval standards. That’s partly because they’re supposed to be paid back in a set amount of time but also because of the “land grab” taking place in the burgeoning marketplace, Frankel says.

The determining factor for whether a bank decides to enter the BNPL space is the amount of risk it’s willing to take, Frankel says. Consumers could be putting themselves in more debt than they can handle — 36% of BNPL users said they were at least somewhat likely to make a late payment within the next year in a March 2021 study by The Ascent — and if forced to decide between making a rent or mortgage payment versus paying back a BNPL loan, customers are more likely to see the smaller debt as a lower priority. Also, banks would earn revenue only from the fees they charge their third-party business partners or potential late fees, since the loans are often 0% interest.

Because of this risk, smaller banks are more hesitant to join this market. Banks with between $1 billion and $10 billion in assets for the most part are saying no to BNPL, with 71% having “little or no interest” in offering such loans, according to Arlington-based IntraFi Network LLC’s fourth-quarter survey of bank executives from 426 banks. Of those with less than $1 billion in assets, 84% said they had no interest. However, about 20% of midsize banks and 13% of small banks said they would offer BNPL in partnership with a fintech company.

The story is different for McLean-based Capital One Financial Corp., which built its empire on credit cards. Chairman and CEO Richard Fairbank announced during a September 2021 earnings call that Capital One, the nation’s 11th largest bank by assets, would test a buy now, pay later product with select existing business clients. But since then, the company has maintained silence.

Capital One, notes Frankel, is better
suited to offer such loans because it has decades of experience with credit cycles. Even so, Fairbank has been cautious.

In 2020, Capital One banned the use of its credit cards for payments on buy now, pay later loans. In reality, the policy prevents paying off debt while incurring debt, and Frankel says he wouldn’t be surprised to see the bank keep the policy even if Capital One introduces a BNPL product.

Meanwhile, Blue Ridge Bank’s leaders remain interested in new BaaS opportunities, and Taxin and Plum believe the current scope is just the beginning.

“We fundamentally believe in the value of community banking, and this allows us to compete and to survive,” Taxin says. “Ultimately I hope it allows us to thrive and to expand the values of customer service, of responsiveness, to more customers.” 

Blue Ridge Bank, FVCbank merger called off

The merger of the parent companies of Charlottesville-based Blue Ridge Bank and Fairfax-based FVCbank has been called off, the companies announced late Thursday.

Blue Ridge Bankshares Inc. and  FVC Bankcorp Inc. mutually agreed to terminate the agreement, which was first announced in July 2021. The companies delayed the merger, which would have created a  $5 billion combined company, five months later, in November 2021.

“Our boards of directors mutually concluded after careful consideration that it would not be prudent to continue to pursue the proposed merger of our companies, ” Blue Ridge President and CEO Brian K. Plum and FVCB Chairman and CEO David W. Pijor said in a joint statement. “The termination of the merger agreement positions both companies to focus on the consistent growth and value creation they have each delivered through the years.”

In February 2021, Blue Ridge completed a merger with Richmond-based Bay Banks of Virginia Inc., parent holding company of Virginia Commonwealth Bank, creating a bank with nearly $2.8 billion in assets.

Founded in 1893, Blue Ridge Bank has 26 locations, including one in Greensboro, North Carolina. As of July 30, the bank had $2.76 billion in assets.

FVCbank began operating in November 2007. The company has $2 billion in assets and has 10 full-service offices in Arlington, Fairfax, Manassas, Reston and Springfield, as well as in Washington, D.C., Baltimore and Rockville, Maryland.

Blue Ridge Bank, FVCbank merger delayed

The merger of Charlottesville-based Blue Ridge Bankshares Inc., the parent company of Blue Ridge Bank, and Fairfax-based FVC Bankcorp Inc., the parent company of FVCbank, will be delayed, the companies announced this week.

The two regional companies announced the merger, which would create a $5 billion combined company, on July 14. The expected closing at the time was early 2022.

Following the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency’s identification of regulatory concerns, the financial institutions now expect the merger to close in the second or third quarter of 2022, Blue Ridge President and CEO Brian K. Plum said in a statement.

“We strongly believe that this transformational partnership remains strategically and financially attractive,” FVCB Chairman and CEO David W. Pijor said in a statement. “For all of the reasons that we’ve discussed previously, this is a highly compelling transaction for both companies, and we are committed to seeing it through to completion. We also know how committed Blue Ridge Bank’s management team is to resolving any concerns raised by its regulators.”

Blue Ridge has started an initiative to address the OCC’s concerns but did not provide the specific concerns.

“While we have additional work to do, we believe the OCC’s concerns are ones that we can solve in a timely fashion, and do not materially impact the strategic rationale of the Merger,” Plum said in a statement.

In February, Blue Ridge completed its merger with Richmond-based Bay Banks of Virginia Inc., the parent holding company of Virginia Commonwealth Bank, creating a bank with $2.8 billion in assets.

Founded in 1893, Blue Ridge Bank has 26 locations, including one in Greensboro, North Carolina. As of July 30, the bank had $2.76 million in assets.

FVCbank began operating in November 2007. The company has $2 billion in assets and is a Virginia-chartered community bank with 10 full-service offices in Arlington, Fairfax, Manassas, Reston and Springfield, as well as in Washington, D.C., Baltimore and Rockville, Maryland.

Va. bank is first to allow customers to buy, redeem bitcoin at ATMs

With cryptocurrency use on the rise, customers of Charlottesville-based Blue Ridge Bankshares Inc., the parent holding company of Blue Ridge Bank, will now be able to purchase and redeem bitcoin at its ATMs, making them the nation’s first commercial bank to do so, the company announced Wednesday.

Blue Ridge Bank cardholders can purchase and redeem bitcoin at 19 locations across the state, including its branch locations and offsite ATMs. The bank has partnered with Woodstock-based BluePoint ATM Solutions and Boston-based bitcoin ATM software provider LibertyX for the new service. Customers will still have access to traditional ATM services.

Cryptocurrencies such as bitcoin are an alternative to conventional currency, but its value fluctuates. As of Feb. 10, one bitcoin is worth approximately $45,000. At the end of January, one bitcoin was worth about $30,000. Since the pandemic’s effects began being felt in March 2020 (when bitcoin was worth $6,000 apiece), the value of bitcoin has been on a relatively steady incline. Business leaders such as Elon Musk of Tesla and Michael Saylor of Tysons-based MicroStrategy have recently invested billions of dollars in bitcoin. Bitcoin is a “dependable store of value and an attractive investment asset with more long-term appreciation potential than holding cash,” Saylor said in an August 2020 statement.

Bank of New York Mellon Corp., the oldest U.S. bank, also announced Thursday that it soon plans to hold, transfer and issue bitcoin and cryptocurrencies for customers.

Blue Ridge Bankshares also recognizes the new focus on cryptocurrency.

“Blue Ridge Bank is excited to continue its evolution to serve the growing needs of our current and future customers,” Blue Ridge Bankshares Inc. CEO Brian K. Plum said in a statement. 

“We predict that more community banks and credit unions will demand innovative fintech solutions like this at their branches, and we are excited to be a leader in this space,” BluePoint ATM Solutions CEO Wade Zirkle added.

Earlier this month, Blue Ridge Bankshares announced it had completed a merger with Richmond-based Bay Banks of Virginia Inc., the parent holding company of Virginia Commonwealth Bank. The combined bank has approximately $2.8 billion in assets, $2.1 billion in loans and $1.9 billion in deposits, based on Sept. 30, 2020 data. This ranks the bank No. 4 in the state for community bank deposit market share for institutions under $10 billion in assets, according to the bank’s August 2020 announcement.

 

Subscribe to Virginia Business.

Get our daily e-newsletter.